Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Intercultural Understanding is better than Ethnocentrism


By Tom Kando

This piece will please “conservatives,” or at least those who are sometimes fed up with too much political correctness. It is a spoof on the familiar cliché that we, in the West, must try to understand the “other”’s legitimate grievances, and not be always so ethnocentric.
The leaders of the Islamic struggle against American imperialism are facing increasing internal criticism. Osama Bin Laden, Iranian President Ahmadinejad and Hetzbollah leader Nasrallah, among others, have to deal with a growing segment of their own people who feel that they are acting too aggressively against the American imperialists.
While agreeing that the struggle against America and the Western world will be long and cannot be shirked, these voices fear that the extreme and violent response to American hegemonism is likely to stoke the flames of anti-Arabism, and to create more hatred and resentment towards Muslims among millions of Americans and Christians in the Western world.

These dissenters argue that, instead of responding to American grievances through violence, Muslims should make an effort to understand the root causes of that resentment. They should study American and Christian culture and values, and develop an understanding of the sociological and historical causes behind the West’s and the Christian world’s deep seeded mistrust of Muslims and Arabs, including centuries of oppression of millions of Europeans and Christians by Moors, Turks and other Muslims, and centuries of economic dominance by Muslims, who for long enjoyed technological and military supremacy in the Middle East, in the Mediterranean Basin and in much of Europe. They should also understand that it is a misreading of the Bible to assume that it preaches violence against non-Christians, and that a majority of Christians do not advocate violence.

This group of critics points out that, by reacting to American resentment violently and by failing to understand the American mind and the reasons behind American grievances, Muslims exacerbate the conflict and create additional millions of American militants every day.

They note that, in the end, the conflict can only be resolved through mutual understanding, for as long the Muslim leadership insists on dealing with America with an iron fist, this will merely drive more and more Americans towards hatred, prejudice and violence. leave comment here

9 comments:

Steve said...

You are brave to presume your readership can fathom irony.

Anonymous said...

Steve
Since Tom's readers are mainly libs, I agree.

Steve said...

Tom, IMHO you may want to be more slective wrt publishing bigoted and insulting anonymous comments.

It's not a long throw to get from "liberals (or conservatives, for that matter) are too stupid to understand irony to the more classic European prejuduces.

You two post a lot of thoughtful stuff. It's only fair to demand a minimal level of thoughtfulness from your posters.

Jan Q said...

I agree with Steve. In fact, after seeing too many insulting, counter-productive and even obscene comments from "Anonymous," I was thinking of quitting this blog altogether. Instead, I asked Tom if it could be moderated. I also would much prefer if each of us is required to identify ourselves, even by a chosen pseudonym if one prefers anonymity. But "anonymous" should not be a name choice because it could be several people on a single thread. And then our replies risk being misdirected to the wrong "anonymous."

I hope we can at least be civil. It's one thing to disagree respectfully, which challenges our opinions and widens our vision. It's quite another to taunt readers by hurling personal insults, or persist in one false assertion after another without providing any citations.

The moderator should also reject long articles that are cut and pasted, and ask the writer simply to provide a link to the article instead.

My 2 cents.

Tom said...

To Steve and Jan:
1. Thank you both for your support.
2. We ARE moderating comments now, as per Jan's request. Most of anonymous' offensive pot shots are being rejected. I permitted his one comment about "libs" because I interpreted it primarily as a (mild) insult of ME, and it didn't cause me that much pain.
3. I AM rejecting cut and paste stuff, agreeing with Jan.
4. So once in a blue moon I still let some (mildly) hostile anonymous stuff pass, but I hope that you don't give up on this blog. There is a lot more support than insult.
5. Some participation by others than an inner circle of friends is desirable, and sometimes that brings in weird stuff...
6. This reminds me of my 40 years of teaching. How permissive should the teacher be? I hear you, and I am always ready to change my policies...

Jan Q said...

Tom,
As a community organizer and lifelong activist, I realize that democracy is inherently messy. I've also learned that community conversations require some basic ground rules, like respect, consideration and sincerity, or else they degenerate and self-destruct.

It's like capitalism, which will implode without some regulation.

I'm sure your moderation efforts will protect the blog's integrity and longevity. Thank you for taking the time to carry it out, and for being receptive to our suggestions.

Steve said...

I'm with Jan Q here.

ALmost no one wants to contribute to a forum where we are subject to troll responses.

Some times it is necesssary to take one's duty as moderator into hand and follow the time honored paridigm: "Don't Feed The Troll".

Your troll won't stop being a troll until the blog stops feeding him. Don't worry about Anonymous, he'll (or she'll) find somewhere else to spout irrelevant comments.

A troll does nothing to enhance a blog (see Jan Q's comment). It just makes it unpleasent for

Note the response from Anonymous to this thread was completely off topic. That is evidence you are dealing with a troll.

Anonymous said...

Do you think that intercultural understanding is possible with Muslims? They are just as religious and stubborn as Americans. I think that you are right by insisting that Muslims try to learn about Western culture and appreciate the differences we have instead of fighting against the differences that seem to be inherent.

tom kando said...

To the latest anonymous comment:
That's sort of my point: everyone always insists that we - enlightened and politically correct westerners - should bend over backwards to
"understand" the "other," not stereotype, not profile, etc. So I tried a little satire, saying, in effect: How about putting the shoe on the other foot for a change? Let THEM try to understand US and the AMERICAN "inscrutable mind," for a change. Or something like that...

Post a Comment

Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!