Saturday, February 5, 2011

Evil America, or Victim America?

By Tom Kando

Johnny,

Thank you for taking the trouble to react in such detail. Because you raise many familiar issues, this warrants a separate post:

I have riled you up, because I have disturbed some long-established assumptions, namely that American foreign policies are (1) uniquely immoral and (2) beneficial to America.

Many people have a deeply ingrained need to believe this, as evidenced by your comments (and Tomi’s). Anti-Americanism is understandable, because for a century, the US presence in the world has been irritatingly large. The big guy is never popular.

I agree that US foreign policy has sometimes been destructive, and self-serving, although no more so than that of other countries. No sane country acts consistently against its self-interest. It has not been more self-serving than that of the Netherlands or other European countries, and much less so than many others.

I didn’t say that American foreign policy was particularly philanthropic. I believe that it has at times been stupid, but at other times enlightened.

You are too young to remember what America did for Europe and the world 60 years ago: World War Two, the Marshall Plan, the creation of the UN, these are all enormous deeds, they are primarily American deeds, and they made the world infinitely better than it would be otherwise.

The US rebuilt the world and created a global economy which is now so competitive that it threatens America’s own economy. If this is not altruistic, I don’t know what is.

I know the worn-out argument - that America did this out of self-interest. Even so, it surely beats the plundering of the defeated by the victors, as has been the rule from ancient Rome to the Versailles Treaties after World War One, and the USSR’s behavior after World War Two.

Your problem is that you cannot disagree with me: Here is what I said:

1) America should pull back, get out of other countries. You disagree?
2) America should stop squandering billions to support other regimes - dictatorial or otherwise. You disagree?
3) America should never have invaded Iraq. You disagree?
4) America should get out of Iraq and Afghanistan now. You disagree?

5) Oil? The Dutch don’t use oil? I experience your traffic “files” every year. Is Shell not a Dutch company? Do AMRO, RABO and the other giants of Dutch Capitalism - and indirectly you - not benefit from the existing “Pax Americana”?

6) One difference is that America pays more of the bills, and American soldiers die by the thousands, so that the Dutch can continue to drive their spic-and-span cars on their super-modern turnpikes, while our infrastructure here crumbles.

7) Israel? Way too complicated of an issue. I do know this: Israel is the only Middle Eastern country without oil, so it is difficult to argue that we are there for $$$. Europe is more critical of Israel than America is. America is more involved in the Middle Eastern Peace Process. It is not clear who is more right, and where anti-Zionism ebbs over into anti-Semitism. In light of 20th century history, Europe should not be too vocally anti-Israel.

8) Revolutions? Some are good, some are bad: Yes, the Easter European “velvet revolution” was a good revolution, and so was the non-violent downfall of Apartheid. Other good revolutions were the American Revolution in 1776, and the counterculture of the 1960s. But some revolutions lead to terror, the dictatorship of the proletariat, theocracy, genocide and bloody “Cultural Revolutions.”

9) So far, I support the Egyptian revolution. I hope that it does not turn into another fundamentalist, Iranian-style, revolution.

But my focus was on America’s role. I see, again, an immediate worldwide perception that the US has a special responsibility in this crisis. Yet as Madeleine explains in her post, one thing we know for sure: “The problems of the Middle East cannot be solved from the outside.” Do you disagree?

And to this I add that reducing US involvement in the Middle East is not only to Egypt’s advantage, but also to America’s.

You want to disagree.

Unlike you, I am sympathetic to the current plight of the American people. I happen to live here. Have you seen our slums, our poverty, our 14% unemployment, the countless homeless on street corners, the millions who have lost their homes, the cutbacks in education and social services, the violence which takes thousands of lives every year, and which has everything to do with poverty, not gun laws, as is easily proven by the fact that 90% of the violence occurs in the lower class?

10) The transfer of wealth from the US is real: Our dual deficit dwarfs that of any other country. We owe ten trillion dollars to the rest of the world. In one generation, we have morphed from the world’s greatest creditor to its greatest debtor.

So I say, let’s stop the insanity, let’s stop spending ourselves into oblivion by trying to police the world. You disagree?

It’s time to cultivate our own garden, as Holland and other shrewder countries have done for many years.

I don’t understand what this has to do with being “proud of my dear USA.” I happen to live here, and I don’t want my country to collapse. Don’t you feel the same about “your beloved Holland”?

I’m sorry if you have a general dislike for America. You cannot imagine that America does things which do not benefit her. You have to believe that somehow our misguided foreign policies are rational and beneficial to us. They are not.

Our goals are the same: America must stop trying to run the world. Our analyses and sympathies differ.leave comment here

8 comments:

johnny said...

Dear Tom,

Thanks for your extended reaction. I will respond to the issues you numbered, but first a general reaction.
I don't regard myself particularly anti-American, I regard the current Obama administration far wiser than our current Rutte administration depending on far-right PVV support.
I read your comment on transfer of wealth not as case of budget deficit. But rather on what country is profiting most from bilateral dependencies. I do not claim the US profits most, but I do claim that it is to complex to know what direction wealth travels. It should even be irrelevant, the goal should be 1+1=3, while not watering down local cultures.
There were some more remarks which gave the impression you were explicitly pro American, which I wanted to balance in my sometimes one-sided reactions.

Even though it is long before my birth I do know about the Marshall help, which indeed was absolutely great. It gave the USA lots and lots of goodwill and you deserved it big time. 60 years after it is still not forgotten I can promise you. My favourite act of the USA is that you kicked us out of Indonesia on moral grounds. Right after WWII the Dutch started two brutal wars on Indonesia to reconquer our former colony that gained independency after the Japanese were defeated. I was startled to learn about the atrocities the Dutch were able to commit right after WWII. The powerplay you showed back than was as great as a nation can be. Personally to me this is more valuable than the Marshall help.

To keep on criticising the Dutch. Once, long before the Marshall help, we were the most powerful nation in the world. Ethics in general were somewhat more backward in these days. But we policed much worse than you, I'm sorry to say, our ancestors have acted like devils. The way we abducted people, raped them systematically and sold them as slaves around the world was the worst. But the way we transformed Indonesian society while robbing it from its coffee and gold was at best stupid. And the despicable apartheid regime is full of Dutch heritage as well.
I guess we do better today, but in a way we still have to make up to the world.

Now, to get to the points:
1. agree
2. agree
3. strongly agree (it was just a weird invasion)
4. agree, although it is a bit more complex. Leaving Afghanistan from one day to the next will lead to many many liberal people, who put there trust on the USA, to be killed or silenced. I talk about people who worked very hard to promote democracy and human rights as well as simple female primary school teachers, they took the US invasion as an opportunity to act and I don't think you can shame there trust by leaving them unsupported. The example will also be very damaging for the US reputation.
The right way to go in the short term is very difficult for that reason.
5. As explained above, the Dutch are assholes in many ways as well. Shell in Nigeria is a good example. The Pax Americana started to crumble in Vietnam and might have ended with the axis of evil speach and the rise of the BRIC nations. Peace is good, but I don't think the underpricing of oil by keeping corrupt regimes up is helping that.
6. Don't blame us for the money the Iraq war costs. You started them and choose to ignore the UN. Neither the money spent on Bin Laden to fight the Soviets was a prime investment. There might be some truth as well.
7. Way to complicated, to speak about so shortly, I agree. Europeans indeed have a lot of guilt for the genocide and atrocities practised by the Germans in WWII. However, I believe that you don't gain a right to practice atrocities by receiving them. Even atrocities on a different scale and certainly not against people who did not have anything to do with it.
8. agree

to be continued... (post to long)

johnny said...

continuation:

9. agree about egyptian revolution.
About the middle east. I agree somewhat, the solution should arise from within. But you are involved financially and militarily, especially by your relation with Israel. Europe is in many ways tied historically, former colonies and the Jews who migrated there after Europeans slaughtered most of them. Also there is the threat of a nuclear war, which makes it more of an international issue. As well as the interests of all monotheistic religions which are so widely spread in the non-asian world.
The world became a smaller place and it not yet clear how we should deal with it, but I believe the UN is the road ahead.
10. I agree you should annihilate your budget deficit urgently, because of domestic problems I heard and saw about, but also because it makes China's power grow to fast. I prefer slow growth there.

I applaud less money to policing the world. But I applaud even lauder if you manage to shift this task you share with NATO to the UN. If you manage it will prevent China to be the next candidate and by definition the UN has more authority than local organisations.

I hope the US and Europe will bundle there anti-corruption knowledge and use it to help propel the UN to what it should become.

A tad boring, but I think our sympathies differ less than you assumed.

tom said...

Hi Johnny,

Thank you again for your comments. You are an excellent and well-informed writer. We are doing all this in English. No matter how smart and well-educated you are (and of course, Montessorinanen are the best, right? haha), I have lived and worked with the English language for half a century, so it is inevitable that you would be at a slight disadvantage. If you were shrewd, you’d force me to do this in Dutch. It would be embarrassing!

As to the substantive issues, what can I say? The points you make are very reasonable.

Pro-American, anti-American, American schmamerican. I’ll admit, this is a tired old horse which I shouldn’t ride any more. Better to be pro-humanity. It’s just that I sometimes become emotional when I see the growing poverty and suffering here, combined with the continuing waste of our resources on military adventures and other bs.
Just this morning I came across data which show that there is more income inequality in the US than in any Arab country. True, this is America’s internal problem. We have a wicked plutocracy. But at the same time, I look at the vast majority of the people here, and they are the victims of this growing dysfunction, not its perpetrators.

As to the Netherlands, well, it had its day. The Golden Century was also a two-edged sword - ripping off Indonesia, etc., but also Rembrandt, Vermeer and fabulous Amsterdam. So it’s hard to say. America, Holland, New York - fascinating places which one loves and sometimes hates...

I look forward to having several borrels with you when I come to Holland in a few weeks.

johnny said...

I'm looking forward to these borrels as well.

And even agony has another side, as a quote from the third man goes:
"Like the fella says, in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love - they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock."

Anonymous said...

I think it is good that someone thinks the USA has done much good. My German relatives in Germany have forgotten that where they live,near Strasund in what was East Germany, would be speaking Russian if we had not liberated them. We rebuilt Germany and Japan. No thanks there. They only like american guns when they want us to protect them.

tom said...

thank you, anonymous,
I feel the same way as you do.

Gail said...

This is an interesting discussion and it leaves me a little angry for several reasons:

1. I too feel like America has been proactive about helping other countries but I am equally as concerned about our motives. Okay, we see the crisis in Egypt-And yes, America is helping-But the American government also needs to look at its own problems as a country-I mean to say that our governement needs to make the connection between rising inequality and economic problems that are going to cause our very infrastructure to collapse one day.

2. Yes, we do help many underdeveloped and problematic countries in a pursuit to try to get closer to democratic goals and ideas but we also need to keep reforming our own democracy in America as well.

3. Also, what is the underlying cause of this mess? Historically America has exploited the very countries that it has supported. This this human evil is cantagious and pulls at all of us.
I think that we each in own way want the world to be a kinder and gentler place.

4. Also, can we talk more about which direction the problem originates from-I mean to say that we have to acknowledge that all societies to some extent are motivated by greed-Is this just my naive perception? I dont think so.

5. Finally, thank you for this blog. I look forward to reading this and it keeps me looking forward to more discussion. Thanks for providing our community with this free space of expression as well as debate.

Gail

tom said...

Gail,
thanks for your comment. I share your frustration and your ambivalence.

Post a Comment

Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!