Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Is Obama One of the Worst or Best Presidents?


By Tom Kando
 
On August 18, 2011, Matt Patterson published a vicious  hit piece against President Obama in the Washington Post.  It continues to be widely circulated on the  Internet, often  misleading the readers  that it’s the Washington Post  which feels this way about Obama. In fact, the paper only printed this  in an attempt to be fair to “the other side.” 

Patterson’s  thesis, based on what Norman Podhoretz had written  earlier, is that  Obama is an incompetent nincompoop, our first affirmative action President, voted into office solely because of his race. The claim is that  Obama may be our  worst President ever,  and that his election was the result of misguided liberal white guilt and  mass hysteria among the electorate.
Patterson  not only claims that Obama is a disastrously incompetent President, but that he also failed to achieve anything  of value during his earlier academic and political careers.

My purpose here is hardly to rebut Patterson’s absurd statement, but to playfully suggest a ranking of US Presidents:

As to the hit piece, just this: it is a furious  rant, utterly lacking  any facts or evidence, and often describing  Obama in a manner  precisely the   opposite of reality: Patterson says that without a Teleprompter the President  is speechless, can’t think clearly, is devoid of ideas, speaks in clichés, is narcissistic!

Is Patterson confusing Obama with George W. Bush, or what? Isn’t the opposite obvious - that Obama is a  Spock-like man who possesses superior rationality, cool detachment and problem-solving capabilities? 

Patterson accuses Obama of blaming his predecessor for the country’s problems. To the contrary, the President  has so much class that he does not do this enough, despite inheriting the worst mess in 70 years.

As to the most obscene accusation - Obama is an affirmative action president:

Patterson and Podhoretz reiterate the oft-heard cliché that affirmative action is racist. 

One thing is a lot clearer: The true racists are  those who cannot conceive of a person of color achieving something without the help of affirmative action!  If a black man reaches a high position, it must be due to affirmative action, right?  What utter hogwash.

Actually, the shoe is entirely on the other foot: It is the  George W. Bushes and the  Mitt Romneys of the world who are utterly unqualified, yet are admitted to Yale, Stanford and Harvard solely because of their family’s  blue blood and despite the fact that they couldn’t have passed my Sociology One class.

Space does not allow  me to list Obama’s  achievements, but any semi-informed person knows that they are considerable, despite inheriting the George W. Bush disaster and the worst Republican obstructionism in  history. While it’s too early to tell, I predict that Obama will go down as one of our country’s top 10 Presidents.

And now, I offer you my ranking of  our country’s 43 Presidents:

Such rankings are usually done  by “experts” such as History and Political Science  professors,  and journalists.  My rankings are based  on my own very limited knowledge plus   rankings by  the eminent historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr., and articles such as a   Spring  2007 Newsweek cover story.  Obviously I had to deal with Obama without the help of Schlesinger or Newsweek:

Criteria include  such things as the conduct of war  (e.g. Washington, Lincoln, FDR), major social legislation (e.g. Lyndon Johnson), peace and prosperity (e.g. Eisenhower), making a mess of things (e.g. George W. Bush, Jimmy Carter).

Bias and subjectivity are unavoidable.  For example, no one can disagree with Arthur Schlesinger that George Washington was  better than Richard Nixon. But how bad was  Richard Nixon?  Apart from  the Watergate scandal,  Nixon made some  positive contributions, for example the opening to China.

In the table below, Presidents receive a score ranging from 0 to 10, and I then group them into four categories: the 14 best, the 10  middle, the 10 worst, and  9 whom I was not able to rank. 

Table I: U.S. Presidents, Grouped and Ranked from Best to Worst

Best Fourteen
1
Franklin Roosevelt
10

2
Abraham Lincoln
10

3
James Madison
9

4
Thomas Jefferson
9

5
George Washington
9

6
Barack Obama
8

7
William Clinton
8

8
John Adams
8

9
James Monroe
8

10
Theodore Roosevelt
8

11
Harry Truman
8

12
John Q. Adams
7

13
Dwight Eisenhower
7

14
Woodrow Wilson
7
Middle Ten
15
Andrew Jackson
6

16
John Kennedy
6

17
George Walker Bush
6

18
Lyndon Johnson
6

19
Ronald Reagan  
6

20
John Tyler       
5

21
Grover Cleveland
5

22
James Carter
4

23
Richard Nixon
4

24
Gerald Ford
4
Worst Ten
25
Ulysses Grant
3

26
James Garfield
3

27
Calvin Coolidge
3

28
Zachary Taylor
2

29
Andrew Johnson
2

30
Herbert Hoover
2

31
Warren Harding  
1

32
James Buchanan
1

33
George W. Bush
1

34
William Harrison
0
Don’t know(Nine)
35
Martin Van Buren


36
James Polk


37
Millard Fillmore


38
Franklin Pierce


39
Rutherford Hayes


40
Chester Arthur


41
Benjamin Harrison


42
William McKinley


43
William Taft


leave comment here

23 comments:

Joost van der Lee said...

I think you are right!!

drtaxsacto said...

For your reference here is a picture of George W. Bush speaking in a similar classroom. (http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/watercooler/2010/jan/24/compare-obamas-teleprompters-classroom-moment-2006/) - How do those images fit with your impressions? Obama is using a teleprompter - Bush is not.

Anonymous said...

Ah, Tom's top 10 award, right up there with that well earned Nobel Peace Prize...but the emperor has no clothes.

michael said...

Hi Tom, I always enjoy your blog, but your rankordering is most enjoyable so far!

Tom Kando said...

Thanks for your comments, folks.
I looked up that video of Obama and the photo of Bush in classrooms.

Until now, even Obama's most severe detractors have grudgingly conceded that he is - if nothing else, even if you totally disagree with his policies - at least a powerful orator (that's what propelled him on his political career from the 1990s onward).

But this, too, is incorrect? And George W. is a better public speaker? Hmmm...I don't quite see this....

Anonymous said...

I am impressed with the ranking system. I actually learned something and was pleased that President Obama received a good ranking. I think that we need to look at the problems that each president inherited coming into office and their overal job. You do a good job at ranking these. I also find it interesting that President Obama has been criticized so harshly. Perhaps, I am biased because he is African American and I want my race to do well. I am happy that he is still alive and I really want him to win a second term. I do agree that he has some weaknessed but I believe that deep down inside he has a good heart and spirit that is for all people. I like the fact that he tries to bridge various countries and improve the image of America in the minds of those who think very little of us. I think that your ranking has merit and you would create a positive uproar if you could show this off to CNN. What a commentary/debated topic this could be. Great Job!

Gail Wallace

Terry said...

Not being a student of history, I dare not expose my ignorance too much. However, I will say that I think, first, that Obama is one of the most deliberative presidents in recent years and one who has tried to work with the most obstructive opponents in congress that I have ever heard of in our country. I support Obama in almost every thing I know about his decisions. This immigration policy shows us first, that Obama understands the problem and has a humane and reasonable solution for now; and second, that the power of the President is indeed limited and that the many lies opponents put out are garbage. Only history will tell, but we will never know if Obama might even rise higher in the list, if we don't give him first another term and second a congress he can work with....moderates or his party.

Henry said...

Tom
I would put Nixon further down the list and elevate Ike and Jackson . Remember Vietnam ?

Tom Kando said...

I like the comments by Gail and Terry (since they agree with me).

Henry is probably right. As a history prof, he knows a hell of a lot more than I do.

But this ranking was mostly a playful thing, not a scientific thing.

Still,Terry makes a very serious and valid point, when he hopes that Obama gets a second term. It would be tragic if the Republicans succeeded in achieving their single-minded goal of the past 3 years: To make Obama fail, no matter at what cost to the country.

Anonymous said...

Obama declares Executive Privilege! Uh oh! Sounds like a cover up! Uh oh! Sounds very Nixonian! Uh oh! And right in the middle of an election year too! Goody, time for a show trial. What did the president know and when did he know it? Goody, Goody

Tom Kando said...

I always appreciate comments such as those by anonymous on June 20. They lend diversity to our blog, which is better than if we were just preaching to the choir.

That said, here is my take on “Fast and Furious”:

Since 2006, the ATF has engaged in sting operations which let “guns walk” across the Mexican border, in an effort to track down murderous Mexican drug lords. This policy, initiated by the Bush Administration, malfunctioned, leading among other things to the death of a US border patrol.

Obama’s attorney general Eric Holder put a stop to “Fast and Furious.”

Republican Congressman Darrell Issa’s committee has been investigating this matter. Although Holder has appeared before the committee many times and handed over thousands of pages of documents, the committee has voted to hold him in contempt of congress, for failing to hand over some additional materials. The fight has now escalated to where the President has declared Executive Privilege, i.e. his right to withhold information from Congress in the name of confidentiality. Most US Presidents have invoked executive privilege, ever since George Washington. George W. Bush did it 6 times. This is the first time Obama is doing it.

My take: A Republican partisan stunt, timed to this year’s political campaign.

Anonymous said...

The same Obama regime that has no reservations about divulging top secret information for political purposes, i.e., outing the Pakistani doctor, leaking the fact that a MI6 British citizen had infiltrated al-Qaida in Yemen, claiming credit for the stuxnet attack on Iran, advertising the drone targeting criteria, and providing all kind of classified info to a film crew, now finds it is a vital national interest to prevent the Congress from investigating how a border patrol agent was murdered due to Justice Dept incompetence. Definitely sounds like they’re trying to hide something. Definitely sounds like a COVER UP, and as we know on this the 40th anniversary of Watergate: it’s not the crime, it’s the cover up. Time for a special prosecutor! Let’s cut to the chase: Impeach Tricky Barry Now! Looking forward to seeing the perp walk out of the white house. Looking forward to the “I am not a crook” speech.

Tom Kando said...

Anonymous:

My, my, what venom. A litany of alleged malfeasances by President Obama, the allegation that the administration is trying to cover up how it has handled “Fast and Furious,” President Obama is “Tricky Barry” and a “perp,” etc., etc.

We get it: you don’t like our current President, and you want him out.

Comments such as yours (and the prevailing conservative anti-Obama rhetoric) reveal a rage and hatred of this President that are unparalleled in history, and a willingness to remove him by hook or by crook, whatever it takes.

As a social psychologist, I am puzzled by this. Is it plain old racism? Xenophobia? Fear of new things and a changing world that is terribly threatening to people like you?

The Obama administration has been unexceptional in every conceivable way, whether it is the leaks and public relations steps it has undertaken on its own behalf (your list, above), whether it is its degree of “leftism,” “socialism,” or “un-Americanism.” To the contrary, this President has been cautious and centrist. This is the first time he has invoked executive privilege. George W. Bush did it 6 times.

Your animus is visceral, irrational and personal. I can’t do anything about it.

robby jackson said...

Although i was personally have jack kennedy higher on this list, you have a well spoken blog. I do not see why so many people think he is a terrible president either.

Tom Kando said...

to robby jackson:
thanks for your support. I checked out your blog. Nice.

Anonymous said...

THIS ENTIRE ARTICLE IS A JOKE.



RAY SHARER

Tom Kando said...

That funny, he?
I'm glad you enjoyed it

kboike said...

seriously? who cares about your "rankings" - that space would have been put to better use with the list of obama's accomplishments. since there are VERY few, IF ANY, they would have fit.

Tom Kando said...

thank you for your interest, kboike

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the rebuttal to Matt Patterson's article. He must be an extremist of he first order and spews hatred. I just can't believe the all the lies floating around the internet about our President. It seems completely un-American to me.

J. Gray

Tom Kando said...

Thanks for your agreement.
The Internet is indeed an interesting new medium. Due to its anonimity, it enables people to say much worse and crazier things than before...

Roy Staton said...

Obama is very smart. That is often overrated as a leadership quality. College educated officers leading experienced troops in Vietnam often got fragged. Intellectually solving the problem after considering all the data will come up with correct solution.....long after the problem has since morphed six times into different problems. Like hunting you have to shoot ahead of the problem with institution, instinct and incomplete knowledge. Being able to shoot from the hip accurately so to speak. A quality missing in Obama.

jackmarie said...

Well I would like to add the name of “Obama” as the best of presidents in the list of us presidents. I am very influenced by his charming personality as well his dedication to ‘American Country’. He is a great man in real words.

Post a Comment

Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!