By Tom Kando
On August 18, 2011, Matt Patterson published a vicious hit piece against President Obama in the Washington Post. It continues to be widely circulated on the Internet, often misleading the readers that it’s the Washington Post which feels this way about Obama. In fact, the paper only printed this in an attempt to be fair to “the other side.”
Patterson’s thesis, based on what Norman Podhoretz had written earlier, is that Obama is an incompetent nincompoop, our first affirmative action President, voted into office solely because of his race. The claim is that Obama may be our worst President ever, and that his election was the result of misguided liberal white guilt and mass hysteria among the electorate.
Patterson not only claims that Obama is a disastrously incompetent President, but that he also failed to achieve anything of value during his earlier academic and political careers.
My purpose here is hardly to rebut Patterson’s absurd statement, but to playfully suggest a ranking of US Presidents:
As to the hit piece, just this: it is a furious rant, utterly lacking any facts or evidence, and often describing Obama in a manner precisely the opposite of reality: Patterson says that without a Teleprompter the President is speechless, can’t think clearly, is devoid of ideas, speaks in clichés, is narcissistic!
Is Patterson confusing Obama with George W. Bush, or what? Isn’t the opposite obvious - that Obama is a Spock-like man who possesses superior rationality, cool detachment and problem-solving capabilities?
Patterson
accuses Obama of blaming his predecessor for the country’s problems. To the
contrary, the President has so much
class that he does not do this enough, despite inheriting the worst mess in 70
years.
As to the
most obscene accusation - Obama is an affirmative action president:
Patterson and Podhoretz reiterate the oft-heard cliché that affirmative action is racist.
One thing is
a lot clearer: The true racists are
those who cannot conceive of a person of color
achieving something without the help of affirmative action! If a black man reaches a high position, it
must be due to affirmative action, right?
What utter hogwash.
Actually, the
shoe is entirely on the other foot: It is the
George W. Bushes and the Mitt
Romneys of the world who are utterly unqualified, yet are admitted to Yale,
Stanford and Harvard solely because of their family’s blue blood and despite the fact that they
couldn’t have passed my Sociology One class.
Space does
not allow me to list Obama’s achievements, but any semi-informed person
knows that they are considerable, despite inheriting the George W. Bush
disaster and the worst Republican obstructionism in history. While it’s too early to tell, I
predict that Obama will go down as one of our country’s top 10 Presidents.
And now, I
offer you my ranking of our country’s 43
Presidents:
Such rankings
are usually done by “experts” such as
History and Political Science professors, and journalists. My rankings are based on my own very limited knowledge plus rankings by
the eminent historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr., and articles such as
a Spring 2007 Newsweek cover story. Obviously I had to deal with Obama without the
help of Schlesinger or Newsweek:
Criteria
include such things as the conduct of
war (e.g. Washington, Lincoln, FDR),
major social legislation (e.g. Lyndon Johnson), peace and prosperity (e.g.
Eisenhower), making a mess of things (e.g. George W. Bush, Jimmy Carter).
Bias and
subjectivity are unavoidable. For
example, no one can disagree with Arthur Schlesinger that George Washington
was better than Richard Nixon. But how
bad was Richard Nixon? Apart from
the Watergate scandal, Nixon made
some positive contributions, for example
the opening to China.
In the table
below, Presidents receive a score ranging from 0 to 10, and I then group them
into four categories: the 14 best, the 10
middle, the 10 worst, and 9 whom
I was not able to rank.
Table
I: U.S. Presidents, Grouped and Ranked from Best to Worst
Best Fourteen
|
1
|
Franklin Roosevelt
|
10
|
2
|
Abraham Lincoln
|
10
|
|
3
|
James Madison
|
9
|
|
4
|
Thomas Jefferson
|
9
|
|
5
|
George Washington
|
9
|
|
6
|
Barack Obama
|
8
|
|
7
|
William Clinton
|
8
|
|
8
|
John Adams
|
8
|
|
9
|
James Monroe
|
8
|
|
10
|
Theodore Roosevelt
|
8
|
|
11
|
Harry Truman
|
8
|
|
12
|
John Q. Adams
|
7
|
|
13
|
Dwight Eisenhower
|
7
|
|
14
|
Woodrow Wilson
|
7
|
|
Middle Ten
|
15
|
Andrew Jackson
|
6
|
16
|
John Kennedy
|
6
|
|
17
|
George Walker Bush
|
6
|
|
18
|
Lyndon Johnson
|
6
|
|
19
|
Ronald Reagan
|
6
|
|
20
|
John Tyler
|
5
|
|
21
|
Grover Cleveland
|
5
|
|
22
|
James Carter
|
4
|
|
23
|
Richard Nixon
|
4
|
|
24
|
Gerald Ford
|
4
|
|
Worst Ten
|
25
|
Ulysses Grant
|
3
|
26
|
James Garfield
|
3
|
|
27
|
Calvin Coolidge
|
3
|
|
28
|
Zachary Taylor
|
2
|
|
29
|
Andrew Johnson
|
2
|
|
30
|
Herbert Hoover
|
2
|
|
31
|
Warren Harding
|
1
|
|
32
|
James Buchanan
|
1
|
|
33
|
George W. Bush
|
1
|
|
34
|
William Harrison
|
0
|
|
Don’t know(Nine)
|
35
|
Martin Van Buren
|
|
36
|
James Polk
|
||
37
|
Millard Fillmore
|
||
38
|
Franklin Pierce
|
||
39
|
Rutherford Hayes
|
||
40
|
Chester Arthur
|
||
41
|
Benjamin Harrison
|
||
42
|
William McKinley
|
||
43
|
William Taft
|
leave comment here
23 comments:
I think you are right!!
For your reference here is a picture of George W. Bush speaking in a similar classroom. (http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/watercooler/2010/jan/24/compare-obamas-teleprompters-classroom-moment-2006/) - How do those images fit with your impressions? Obama is using a teleprompter - Bush is not.
Ah, Tom's top 10 award, right up there with that well earned Nobel Peace Prize...but the emperor has no clothes.
Hi Tom, I always enjoy your blog, but your rankordering is most enjoyable so far!
Thanks for your comments, folks.
I looked up that video of Obama and the photo of Bush in classrooms.
Until now, even Obama's most severe detractors have grudgingly conceded that he is - if nothing else, even if you totally disagree with his policies - at least a powerful orator (that's what propelled him on his political career from the 1990s onward).
But this, too, is incorrect? And George W. is a better public speaker? Hmmm...I don't quite see this....
I am impressed with the ranking system. I actually learned something and was pleased that President Obama received a good ranking. I think that we need to look at the problems that each president inherited coming into office and their overal job. You do a good job at ranking these. I also find it interesting that President Obama has been criticized so harshly. Perhaps, I am biased because he is African American and I want my race to do well. I am happy that he is still alive and I really want him to win a second term. I do agree that he has some weaknessed but I believe that deep down inside he has a good heart and spirit that is for all people. I like the fact that he tries to bridge various countries and improve the image of America in the minds of those who think very little of us. I think that your ranking has merit and you would create a positive uproar if you could show this off to CNN. What a commentary/debated topic this could be. Great Job!
Gail Wallace
Not being a student of history, I dare not expose my ignorance too much. However, I will say that I think, first, that Obama is one of the most deliberative presidents in recent years and one who has tried to work with the most obstructive opponents in congress that I have ever heard of in our country. I support Obama in almost every thing I know about his decisions. This immigration policy shows us first, that Obama understands the problem and has a humane and reasonable solution for now; and second, that the power of the President is indeed limited and that the many lies opponents put out are garbage. Only history will tell, but we will never know if Obama might even rise higher in the list, if we don't give him first another term and second a congress he can work with....moderates or his party.
Tom
I would put Nixon further down the list and elevate Ike and Jackson . Remember Vietnam ?
I like the comments by Gail and Terry (since they agree with me).
Henry is probably right. As a history prof, he knows a hell of a lot more than I do.
But this ranking was mostly a playful thing, not a scientific thing.
Still,Terry makes a very serious and valid point, when he hopes that Obama gets a second term. It would be tragic if the Republicans succeeded in achieving their single-minded goal of the past 3 years: To make Obama fail, no matter at what cost to the country.
Obama declares Executive Privilege! Uh oh! Sounds like a cover up! Uh oh! Sounds very Nixonian! Uh oh! And right in the middle of an election year too! Goody, time for a show trial. What did the president know and when did he know it? Goody, Goody
I always appreciate comments such as those by anonymous on June 20. They lend diversity to our blog, which is better than if we were just preaching to the choir.
That said, here is my take on “Fast and Furious”:
Since 2006, the ATF has engaged in sting operations which let “guns walk” across the Mexican border, in an effort to track down murderous Mexican drug lords. This policy, initiated by the Bush Administration, malfunctioned, leading among other things to the death of a US border patrol.
Obama’s attorney general Eric Holder put a stop to “Fast and Furious.”
Republican Congressman Darrell Issa’s committee has been investigating this matter. Although Holder has appeared before the committee many times and handed over thousands of pages of documents, the committee has voted to hold him in contempt of congress, for failing to hand over some additional materials. The fight has now escalated to where the President has declared Executive Privilege, i.e. his right to withhold information from Congress in the name of confidentiality. Most US Presidents have invoked executive privilege, ever since George Washington. George W. Bush did it 6 times. This is the first time Obama is doing it.
My take: A Republican partisan stunt, timed to this year’s political campaign.
The same Obama regime that has no reservations about divulging top secret information for political purposes, i.e., outing the Pakistani doctor, leaking the fact that a MI6 British citizen had infiltrated al-Qaida in Yemen, claiming credit for the stuxnet attack on Iran, advertising the drone targeting criteria, and providing all kind of classified info to a film crew, now finds it is a vital national interest to prevent the Congress from investigating how a border patrol agent was murdered due to Justice Dept incompetence. Definitely sounds like they’re trying to hide something. Definitely sounds like a COVER UP, and as we know on this the 40th anniversary of Watergate: it’s not the crime, it’s the cover up. Time for a special prosecutor! Let’s cut to the chase: Impeach Tricky Barry Now! Looking forward to seeing the perp walk out of the white house. Looking forward to the “I am not a crook” speech.
Anonymous:
My, my, what venom. A litany of alleged malfeasances by President Obama, the allegation that the administration is trying to cover up how it has handled “Fast and Furious,” President Obama is “Tricky Barry” and a “perp,” etc., etc.
We get it: you don’t like our current President, and you want him out.
Comments such as yours (and the prevailing conservative anti-Obama rhetoric) reveal a rage and hatred of this President that are unparalleled in history, and a willingness to remove him by hook or by crook, whatever it takes.
As a social psychologist, I am puzzled by this. Is it plain old racism? Xenophobia? Fear of new things and a changing world that is terribly threatening to people like you?
The Obama administration has been unexceptional in every conceivable way, whether it is the leaks and public relations steps it has undertaken on its own behalf (your list, above), whether it is its degree of “leftism,” “socialism,” or “un-Americanism.” To the contrary, this President has been cautious and centrist. This is the first time he has invoked executive privilege. George W. Bush did it 6 times.
Your animus is visceral, irrational and personal. I can’t do anything about it.
Although i was personally have jack kennedy higher on this list, you have a well spoken blog. I do not see why so many people think he is a terrible president either.
to robby jackson:
thanks for your support. I checked out your blog. Nice.
THIS ENTIRE ARTICLE IS A JOKE.
RAY SHARER
That funny, he?
I'm glad you enjoyed it
seriously? who cares about your "rankings" - that space would have been put to better use with the list of obama's accomplishments. since there are VERY few, IF ANY, they would have fit.
thank you for your interest, kboike
Thanks for the rebuttal to Matt Patterson's article. He must be an extremist of he first order and spews hatred. I just can't believe the all the lies floating around the internet about our President. It seems completely un-American to me.
J. Gray
Thanks for your agreement.
The Internet is indeed an interesting new medium. Due to its anonimity, it enables people to say much worse and crazier things than before...
Obama is very smart. That is often overrated as a leadership quality. College educated officers leading experienced troops in Vietnam often got fragged. Intellectually solving the problem after considering all the data will come up with correct solution.....long after the problem has since morphed six times into different problems. Like hunting you have to shoot ahead of the problem with institution, instinct and incomplete knowledge. Being able to shoot from the hip accurately so to speak. A quality missing in Obama.
Well I would like to add the name of “Obama” as the best of presidents in the list of us presidents. I am very influenced by his charming personality as well his dedication to ‘American Country’. He is a great man in real words.
Post a Comment
Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!