by Tom Kando
1. Introduction:
One of my perennial concerns is the relative health and well-being of various countries. For example, I fret a lot about Mexico’s descent into lawlessness and anarchy. There used to be a saying, when the US stole Mexican territory and preyed upon Mexico in other ways as well, "Poor Mexico, so far away from God and so near the United States." Today, this could be reversed: "Poor America, so near Mexico." Could the narco-mayhem south of the border ebb over into the US?
The term "failed state" comes to mind. We know that some countries, for example Somalia, have ceased to be "countries" in any meaningful sense except as a swath of surface on a paper map. Is our next-door neighbor in danger of emulating places such as Somalia? Of approaching disintegration?
But the question is generic: How do different countries stack up, or rank, overall?
One of my perennial concerns is the relative health and well-being of various countries. For example, I fret a lot about Mexico’s descent into lawlessness and anarchy. There used to be a saying, when the US stole Mexican territory and preyed upon Mexico in other ways as well, "Poor Mexico, so far away from God and so near the United States." Today, this could be reversed: "Poor America, so near Mexico." Could the narco-mayhem south of the border ebb over into the US?
The term "failed state" comes to mind. We know that some countries, for example Somalia, have ceased to be "countries" in any meaningful sense except as a swath of surface on a paper map. Is our next-door neighbor in danger of emulating places such as Somalia? Of approaching disintegration?
But the question is generic: How do different countries stack up, or rank, overall?
2. The Annual “Failed State” Index:
One pretty good source is the “2013 Failed States Index,” the “Annual Special Report by Foreign Policy and the Fund for Peace.”
(http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/06/24/2013_failed_states_interactive_map).
This publication scores 178 countries on twelve indicators that measure social, economic, political and military variables. The higher a country’s combined score is, the closer it is to being a “failed state.”
Here are the twelve indicators:
Social: 1. Demographic Pressures, including diseases and food scarcity.
2. Refugees, IDPs (Internally Displaced Persons).
3. Group Grievances, ethnic discrimination.
4. Human Flight and brain drain.
Economic: 5. Uneven Development, inequality.
6. Poverty and Economic Decline, debt, unemployment, per capita GDP.
Pol. & Military: 7. State Legitimacy, corruption, democracy, drug trade.
8. Public Services, crime, education, healthcare, roads.
9. Human Rights, press and political freedom, incarceration, executions.
10. Security Apparatus, riots, coups, rebellions.
11. Factionalized Elites, power struggles.
12. Foreign military intervention, foreign assistance.
As mentioned, the study ranks 178 countries from “best” to “worst.” The lower a country is on the list, the closer it is to being a failed state. That is, the more it suffers from: demographic and public health problems, poverty and other economic problems, ethnic strife and discrimination, the absence of democracy and self-determination, the absence of the rule of law and of human rights, poorly developed public services, education and transportation, police state practices, and the need for foreign economic and military intervention.
This index is comprehensive enough to simply say that the list ranks the world’s countries in terms of - essentially - the “best” to the “worst.” From countries in which human life is most felicitous to where it is most hellish.
In Table One, I list 31 countries of special interest:
Table One: 31 Selected Countries ranked from "Best" to "Worst," i.e. to most "Failed State" status.
Country
|
Rank
|
Comment
|
Finland
|
1
|
best
country in the world
|
Sweden
|
2
|
|
Norway
|
3
|
|
Switzerland
|
4
|
|
Denmark
|
5
|
|
Iceland
|
8
|
|
Canada
|
11
|
|
Netherlands
|
12
|
|
Germany
|
14
|
|
France
|
17
|
|
Britain
|
19
|
|
US
|
20
|
|
Singapore
|
21
|
best
country in Asia
|
Japan
|
23
|
|
Uruguay
|
24
|
best
country in Latin America
|
Italy
|
32
|
|
Hungary
|
38
|
|
Brazil
|
53
|
|
Botswana
|
58
|
best
country in Africa
|
Mexico
|
82
|
|
Russia
|
99
|
worst
country in Europe
|
India
|
100
|
|
Indonesia
|
103
|
|
Israel/West
Bank
|
110
|
|
China
|
113
|
|
Bangladesh
|
150
|
|
Nigeria
|
163
|
|
Pakistan
|
166
|
|
Iraq
|
168
|
|
Afghanistan
|
172
|
|
Somalia
|
178
|
worst
country in the world
|
3. The US and other highlights:
Looking at the report, a few facts jump at us right away: For one thing, European countries are highly over-represented among the "best" countries. All five Scandinavian countries are in the top ten - Finland is number #1, Norway #2, Sweden #3, Denmark #5 and Iceland #8.
The United States is in 20th place. This may
cause simple-minded jingoists to
stop reading and throw away this
article. 20th place is
unacceptable to those who continue to blindly believe - contrary to empirical evidence - that life in the US is
incomparably better than anywhere else.
However, if you bear with me, I’ll show you that this country’s 20th place, out of 178, is respectable. Keep in mind that we rank 20th overall, when averaging all twelve indicators. Like other countries, the US has its strengths and its weaknesses. I will shortly point some of these out.
Finland ranks as the best country in the world overall - if 6-months long nights and polar freezing conditions don’t bother you. Switzerland is near the top. Our next-door neighbor Canada ranks quite high as well. The larger Western European countries - Germany, France, Britain - are in the same league as the US, somewhat ahead of the US but not significantly so. Japan is a bit behind the US, but not significantly so. The best Latin American country, Uruguay, is number 24. Italy, delightful to visit, struggles in 32nd position, as does my country of birth, Hungary, in 38th place. The best African country, Botswana, cannot do better than 58. Our southern neighbor, plagued by drug wars, is number 82. Russia is the worst European country, at number 99, barely ahead of India, which is in 100th position.
Israel does poorly at 110, due to its Palestinian problem. China may boast to be the world’s new economic power house, but it ranks a very poor 113th. Iraq and Afghanistan, the two countries where the US has been waging war over the past decade, are among the world’s very worst countries, at 168 and 172. Finally, Somalia, at 178, is the worst place on earth.
4. The US and other individual countries’ strengths and weaknesses:
In Table Two, I present the twelve indicators, and I show which countries score the highest and the lowest on each. In addition, I give the results for the US, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands and France.
Table Two : How do various countries score on separate indicators of socio-economic and political well-being?
1. Demo-graphic
pro-blems
|
2.
Refu-gees (IDP)
|
3. Group
Grie-vances, discrim-ination
|
4.
Flight, brain drain
|
5. Uneven dev., Inequa-lity
|
6.pov-erty,
econ. decline
|
7.state
legiti-
macy
|
8. Public services
deterio-ration
|
9. Human
rights, rule of law
|
10.
Security
apparatus,
police
|
11.
Factio-nalized elites
|
12.
Exter-nal inter-vention
|
|
Best
|
Iceland
|
New Zealand
|
Iceland
|
US
|
Finland
|
Luxem-bourg
|
Sweden
|
Luxembourg
|
Nether-lands
|
Iceland
|
Switz-erland
|
New Zealand/
US
|
Worst
|
Congo
(D.R.)
|
Sudan
|
Iraq
|
Haiti
|
Angola
|
Haiti
|
North
Korea
|
Chad
|
Somalia
|
Somalia
|
Sudan
|
Sudan
|
US
|
3.0 (23rd
)
|
2.3 (26th)
|
4.2 (39th)
|
1.0 (1st)
|
4.8
(36th) |
3.2 (15th)
|
2.3 (21st)
|
2.4
(23rd)
|
3.2 (35th)
|
2.2
(17th ) |
3.9 (37th )
|
1.0
(1st) |
Canada
|
18th
|
19th
|
11th
|
12th
|
15th
|
3rd
|
11th
|
17th
|
15th
|
13th
|
16th
|
1st
|
Ger-
many
|
9th
|
58th !
|
44th !
|
16th
|
24th
|
10th
|
9th
|
12th
|
13th
|
18th
|
14th
|
11th
|
Nether-
lands
|
23rd
|
29th
|
32nd
|
15th
|
9th
|
19th
|
8th
|
5th
|
1st
|
11th
|
10th
|
12th
|
France
|
19th
|
22nd
|
81st!
|
9th
|
28th
|
38th
|
20th
|
8th
|
19th
|
21st
|
13th
|
10th
|
Table Two shows what the strengths and the weaknesses of the United States are: This country ranks number one on attracting immigrants and benefitting from other countries’ brain drain. We are also the least likely to depend on foreign intervention, either economic or military.
On the other hand, there is in America a substantial amount of ethnic inequality and discrimination (rank: 39), there is much power struggle between our various elites (rank: 37), a high degree of economic inequality (rank: 36) and human rights violations (rank: 35). These are the four aspects of American society which need the greatest improvement.
5. On the whole, small countries are the best countries:
Every single one of the world’s thirteen highest ranked countries is either very small, or relatively small. Canada and Australia are large only in area. Their populations are 35 million and 22 million, respectively. That is less than California. The other top thirteen countries range in population from 300,000 (Iceland) to 17 million (Netherlands).
In addition, there are six other countries which also rank higher than the US. Only three of them are mid-sized countries: Slightly ahead of the US are Germany (#14), France (#17) and Great Britain (#19).
Table Three lists the nine largest (by population) countries of the world.
Table Three: Large Countries Are Bad Countries - Except the US.
Country
|
Population
|
rank, in terms of quality
|
China
|
1.36 billion
|
113
|
India
|
1.23 billion
|
100
|
United States
|
317 million
|
20
|
Indonesia
|
237 million
|
103
|
Brazil
|
194 million
|
53
|
Pakistan
|
184 million
|
166
|
Nigeria
|
174 million
|
163
|
Bangladesh
|
153 million
|
150
|
Russia
|
143 million
|
99
|
Table Three shows that the rankings of the world’s largest countries range from mediocre to terrible - with one exception: the United States.
It is more difficult to provide a large country with a good government and with a high quality of life than it is to do so for a small country. Large countries inevitably have large pockets of backwardness and dysfunction, which set them back. For example, the South has always been an albatross around the neck of the United States. Despite this, America as a whole ranks relatively high. There are regions in the United States - the two coasts, Minnesota, etc - where the quality of life equals those of Scandinavia, regions which dwarf the size of Scandinavian countries.
It is more reasonable to compare the United States - or North America, of which the US makes up 90% - with Europe. When we do that, The United States and North America rank somewhat higher than does Europe.
6. How do the world’s Continents rank?
Table Four classifies the world’s 178 countries into six regional/continental groups: Africa, Asia, Oceania, Latin America, Europe, and North America. It also divides the world’s countries into three groups: the top 60, the middle 59 and the worst 59. It then shows the proportion of "good," "mediocre," and "bad" countries in each region.
Africa
|
Asia (incl. Mideast)
|
Oceania
|
Latin Am.
|
Europe
|
North Am.
|
Total
|
|
worst 59 countries
|
35 (66%)
|
20 (43%)
|
2 (25%)
|
2 (7%)
|
0 (0%)
|
0 (0%)
|
59
|
mid 59 countries
|
15 (28%)
|
16 (35%)
|
4 (50%)
|
16 (55%)
|
8 (20%)
|
0 (0%)
|
59
|
best 60 countries
|
3 (6%)
|
10 (22%)
|
2 (25%)
|
11 (38%)
|
32 (80%)
|
2 (100%)
|
60
|
total
|
53
|
46
|
8
|
29
|
40
|
2
|
178
|
Table Four shows that North America is by far the best continent: All of it consists of the “world’s best countries” category. In second position is Europe, 80% of whose countries are among the world’s best, 20% among the world’s mediocre countries, and none among the world’s worst. In third place is Latin America, where 38% of the countries are among the world’s best, 55% in the “middle of the pack,” and 7% among the world’s worst. Oceania follows. There, a quarter of the countries are among the world’s best, half among the world’s “medium” quality countries, and a quarter among the world’s worst. Asia is the world’s second most problematic continent: only 22% of Asian countries are among the world’s best. 35% are in the middle of the pack, and 43% are among the world’s worst. Finally Africa: Only 6% of African countries are among the world’s best, 28% are in the middle group, and two thirds of all African countries are among the world’s worst countries. Table Five sums this up:
Table Five: The World’s Major
Regions/Continents Ranked From Best to Worst
Continent/Region
|
Rank - from best to worst
|
North America
|
1
|
Europe
|
2
|
Latin America
|
3
|
Oceania
|
4
|
Asia
|
5
|
Africa
|
6
|
7. In Conclusion: The object of this exercise has been to offer a quick, fact-based picture of the relative position of the various countries and regions of the world in terms of the overall quality of life. Simply, in which countries and on which continents do people live happy, non-violent, prosperous and free lives, and where do they not?
Most international comparisons and generalizations are based on prejudice, stereotypes, nationalism and subjective taste. While this article does not claim profound scholarship, most of the comparisons and generalizations I have presented are fact-based. Hopefully this is an improvement. leave comment here
13 comments:
Hi, Tom--fascinating! I enjoyed your dispassionate and informative narrative, which brought the numbers to life.
Tom - other than the obvious problem that these kind of rankings are little better than lousy estimates and the cross national estimates present data which is almost impossible to collect - these guesses are interesting in the same way that the numbers from dancing with the stars are precisely.
Just because economists use decimal points does not make their estimates any more precise.
Thank you for a very interesting article.
Two quick thoughts: Where does Vietnam fit in? and
Where would California by itself fit in?!!! I say this as being a very biased native Californian. I think it is the weather!
Thanks again.
Terry
Tom, "Fund for Peace"? The name itself lets you know its a left wing group with an agenda. The categories it uses to define good and bad countries are extremely vague and subjective. As I recall, one of the key steps in the scientific method is to have categories that are quantifiable, and have some common standards to judge one thing from another. Like rates of infant mortality, illiteracy, or life expectancy. This study is so murky its laughable. "Group grievances, human rights, incarceration, power struggles?" You have to be kidding.
Thank you for your comments.
Anonymous: Vietnam is #81, just ahead of Mexico. California is not ranked, since the list is for nation states. But I would estimate it to be among the top 10 or 15.
As to conservatives like Jonathan and George:
1. OF COURSE the devil is in the operationalization/quantification of the ranking criteria. And OF COURSE the people who did this study did their best to use quantitative statistics, including such things as life expectancy and infant mortality.
2. So you are climbing up the wrong tree. It ‘s on the basis of QUANTIFIABLE criteria that the US ranks 20th in the world.
3. The name is irrelevant. “Fund for Peace”? How on earth can you stereotype like this, ASSUMING that the group is left wing? I have no idea what the group’s politics are. I assume that the study tries to be unbiased, as most university research does.
4. Were the US ranked #1, I’m sure conservatives would accept this as a fine study.
5. Yet, I try to show that our 20th position is something to be somewhat happy about, for such an enormous and diverse country. My key point is that all in all, North America remains the best place in the world. So what are you getting all huffy about?
6. You are right that this is not hard science. It’s very fallible, and there is always room for improvement. But I find it a fun and enlightening exercise. Conservative criticism of such efforts - as well as their incessant critique of scientific research on issues such as global warming, etc. - borders on nihilism. In essence you’re saying, “bah, don’t bother trying to find out anything...” Conservatives lack an agenda for knowledge and progress.
Well done! Both the facts and the orderly, literate exposition. I said so on Facebook.
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your great blogs and this very informative one.
I would partly disagree with you about the current relationship of Mexico and/or the U.S. I still think Mexico is unfortunate having the huge American illegal drug market over its border, often connived at by our police and our prison guards. Without this market, Mexico would have no or few drug lords. Guns are illegal in Mexico, but largely supplied from the U.S. Many American gun shops are along the Mexican border. Another reason why a border with the U.S. is a misfortune for Mexico. I still feel there is truth in Mexico being too far from God and too close the U.S.
I thank Barry and Tom S. for their comments.
Right, it's been said many times (rightly so), that without the immense DEMAND for drugs (in the US), the problem would evaporate. Or else, abandoning our prohibitionist war on drugs could achieve the same result.
Of course, we would have to accept the fact that drug use would increase. When something is legal, people do it more.
This is fantastic!
The government is taking your wages, taxing your property, monitoring your speech, tracking your location, restricting your travel, controlling your healthcare, and can now assassinate you without charge or trial anytime it wants by simply calling you a terriorst. As such, you should ask yourself who is going to stand up and defend your liberty from an ever growing tyrannical government? Not the politicians, for they are the perpetrators. Only the Militia is chartered by the Constitution of the United States to protect the people from the government. So please join or start a local militia.
Read more about the Militia at: http://www.militianews.com/
I thank candidate Eric Pearson for his comments, even though I disagree with them.
I'm sure the particular economic climate may failure, just what does one fellas feel.
Our chief executive is wrecking our own economic system, 70 pct of individuals want to pay bills along with cannot undertake it.
100 zillion connected with Americans usually are out of work. We're within difficulties in the united states.
Time for you to get real. Our financial situation in the Oughout.
Utes. is unpleasant.
Personally i think detrimental to my personal good friends
exactly who are unable to locate a employment in
this particular overall economy. We end up needing assist.
Each of our time since the worlds extremely energy will be coming to an end.
The united states is condemned.
We end up needing a brand new us president, our is messing up America.
Your financial system gets more serious along with more painful each year.
Obama, where by may be the modify people stated.
Many of us ended up offers alter and also that which you include is equivalent to what
the last leader presented us all. Nothing!
The finances in the us can be horrible. Along with with all the current
dollars producing it is going to acquire a lot even worse.
North america, home buying to be one of the most highly effective land is apparently going to a conclusion.
Tiongkok may be the brand-new North america currently.
I am National as well as 'm extremely miserable.
It really is unlucky that any of us have a very federal government that is not for as well as because of the people nowadays.
We need magic in the us. We are throughout trouble with your financial crisis here.
This page can be helpful. I'm looking into the actual budget for the majority of for
just a University challenge.
Appreciate it for all this data, our college or university school is doing us
carry out a analysis around the financial situation in america.
The usa is really a region which is throughout problems!
Our god guide The usa.
Our god bless The us. All of us do not require a lot more wars in the united states, we'd like much more work opportunities.
Persons across The us will be in trouble plus the work price can be skyrocketing.
I have decided to leave anonymous' gibberish on the blog because:
1. either it is written by a machine,
2. or by someone who is illiterate.
Either way, it is a great illustration of the Internet's potential to become garbage.
The comment also contained a link to something called "the price of gold," which I have removed. Obviously, anonymous was trying to monetize something...
Post a Comment
Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!