Is America the stupid country? The easy-to-brainwash country? A country of lemmings? Other countries have lost their way in the past - Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, Argentina, Mexico - is it America’s turn now?
Millennials and other young people made up 13% of all the votes on November 4. Oh sure, it’s not worth voting, you say, because you are terribly busy, and the system is rigged anyway...Those are some of the excuses. Well, good luck with that! If you keep letting old men decide who is going to rule, you will continue to get screwed by the plutocracy
Reactionary Behavior: Obama saved us out of the Great Recession, the worst thing in eighty years, and Americans are practically ready to lynch him. What is that?
However, an historical perspective might help: such reversals are common. In 1945, immediately after Churchill had saved his country, defeated Hitler and won World War II, the British electorate kicked him out and replaced him with Labour’s Clement Attlee. How is that for ingratitude? Reaction and regression are part of history. In the words which.”
Take the French Revolution - 1789. It was followed by Napoleon’s dictatorship and a century of monarchy and restoration. Not until 1871 did France become a permanent Republic. Ancient Rome, same story: There were many populist efforts at dismantling the senatorial and patrician oligarchy, for example those of the Gracchi brothers, those of Marius and those of Caesar, who was a populist. To little avail. The aristocracy ALWAYS came roaring back. Sulla triumphed over Marius, the Gracchi and Caesar were assassinated.
The US? Here, we had a Civil
War, Lincoln’s heroic presidency, his
Proclamation of Emancipation, the 14th Amendment and an attempted
radical Reconstruction of the Deep South. And then? The rise of Jim Crow
laws, the KKK, and the sordid reaction which persists in some
forms to this very day.
So now the pendulum swings back once again. We are going through
the “GREAT AMERICAN REACTION” (set in motion by Reagan, by the way).
What happened on Nov. 4, 2014 tends to happen almost every time: By the
time a President has served for six
years, many are ready to kick him out, or at least to
kick out his party. Weird.
It happened when Republicans won a majority of house seats in 2010 and in 2012, and it probably happened again on November 4, 2014 (see More Democratic Votes). It is astounding that despite the vastly greater proportion of old, conservative people voting, even on a day like November 4, there are more people who vote democratic than republican! Democracy schmemocracy! Majority rule is circumvented through gerrymandering, the electoral college and other tricks.
Americans are a
generous and altruistic people; they
assume the best in others; to
their credit, they are not envious. However,
they are also naïve and gullible. They lack class consciousness. They
often fail to perceive or to vote for their self-interests. On November 4,
millions of lower middle-class people, little old ladies in tennis shoes,
tea-partiers and other people barely
getting by on miserable incomes, voted in such a way as to make the 10% most
opulent fat cats in America even richer
- at the little people’s own expense.
Now comes the next con job: After the election, Republican
leader Mitch McConnell was like a pussycat.
Oh so magnanimous and reasonable. He is willing to work with
President Obama, he said. “There will be no government shutdown and no
default on the debt.” As to Obamacare? “We just want to replace it with
something better.”
Republicans are now clamoring that they are not just “against” things (Obama
things). They claim to have a positive
agenda. They want to accomplish things.
For example, they wan to start with “tax reform.”
And here is where the con starts. Do you know what “tax
reform” is? It’s tax CUTS. They say: (a) we’ll close loopholes and (b) we’ll
reduce marginal rates and corporate rates. But I know what will happen: only (b) will happen. Loopholes
can never be closed. New rules can always be circumvented. When they eliminated
the home office deduction for professors in the 1980s, all we had to do was to
separate our writing business from our
teaching business in order to continue to use the home office tax deduction.
“Tax Reform” will not be revenue neutral.
Replace Obamacare with something better? Since Obamacare, Republicans have professed
to be concerned about health care. For
150 years, they have resisted all attempts
at providing health benefits to
the entire population, including the dozens of millions of poor
Americans who have had to forego medical coverage. They have loved the fact
that America’s profit-based health care system consumes 17 % of our economy,
much of which has nothing to do with healthcare. Are people blind? Isn’t it obvious that the “better” system
they want to introduce is a return to the status quo, sending back 60
million people to the uninsured rolls? Republicans have never given a damn
about public health, only about the bottom line. Now suddenly that would
change? Come on.
There will now be renewed efforts at privatizing everything,
and further assaults on
government, public services
and unions. Privatization will mean
renewed attempts at handing over the last vestige of a meager “defined benefit”
plan - Social Security - to the grubby
hands of Wall Street gamblers.
The plutocracy is on the march. America is becoming a highly
stratified society. The “land of opportunity” now has a class system every bit
as rigid as that in Europe, where upward mobility now surpassed ours.
The Power Structure:
As ever, the dominant power in America is the white, rich,
middle-aged male. He is numerous, powerful, resourceful and cunning. No other
group approaches his level of power.
The media are complicit. It is
said that they are just the messengers, and that one should never kill messengers. But the problem is that the
media deliver the message so badly. The
media are fearful, and they therefore
collaborate with the power structure. Under the guise of “balance,” they
give a pass to cheats and liars.
When Ted Cruz is interviewed by the allegedly “centrist” NBC,
that network lets him get away with an
oft-repeated lie about Hillary Clinton: That she said she didn’t care about our embassador’s murder
in Benghazi. That is a lie. What she said was: “What difference does it make whether
he was murdered by an organized cell or a spontaneous riot?”
When allegedly liberal NPR interviews the Colorado
legislator who introduced a more “patriotic” history curriculum, they let
her get away with the following amazing statement: “We look at both sides of
historical issues, both the pros and cons of slavery.” Why didn’t NPR say at
that point: “you can’t be serious?”
The solidly democratic Sacramento
Bee prints more right-wing
syndicated columns (Krauthammer, David Brooks, etc.) than progressive ones - Paul Krugman being
one of the few of the latter sort. So the allegedly “centrist” and “moderate”
media kneel before the right-wing spokesmen.
Conclusion:
Unlike the media, I will not
equivocate: Flawed as it is, the Democratic Party is still a regular political
party. Its goal is to improve the lives of the American people, including schools,
infrastructure, safety, health,
environment.
The Republican Party’s goal
is to maximize the wealth of its
supporters. It cleverly uses slogans and subterfuges - “freedom,” “individual
responsibility,” “wasteful, inefficient and corrupt government,” “lazy takers,”
“take America back.” However, their true agenda is to stuff as much money into their own pockets as possible. That is what “the pursuit of happiness” means to them.
There is no reason for the
Republican Party to exist. It is against people, against Americans, against
justice. It should disappear. We need a multi-party system without a Republican
Party. Americans who belong to the Republican Party or who vote for a Republican are either
dishonest or fools.
Now that the Democrats are
nearly the opposition party (apart from that great
Hawaiian-Indonesian-Kenyan-Anglo-American in the white house), they should
start doing what the Republicans have
been doing for six years: Oppose everything, filibuster, paralyze every
republican initiative. Obama can still achieve a lot through executive action,
and he may even be able to push some legislation through Congress, as there is
now a heightened expectation from Congress to finally “do something.” leave comment here
© Tom Kando 2014
© Tom Kando 2014
17 comments:
Excellent! On of your best, Tom. Very orderly exposition, full of specifics, and searing.
Great words! I'm Dutch, know nothing about politics, but understand your anger,Tom
I agree with your title, "Mandate My Foot." The election was no mandate, and it was a reaction; a reaction to a decline in real wages during democratic control. Democrats may stand for the things that enamor you so much in their rhetoric, but in reality they entrenched the plutocracy and reduced the size of the middle class. Republicans, unfortunately, will seek to reduce taxes on the wealthy. That will not help the middle class either. Perhaps the most overlooked item in the rhetoric of either party is small businesses, the backbone of the middle class. Both parties focus on big business and government, and that is what the plutocracy is made up of--collusion between those two groups. So the Republican win is no mandate for Republican policies, its just frustration with the only other alternative our factional system gives us.
Brillant! I was disappointed in the Democrats campaign strategy of running away from Obama's record as though they had believed everything the far right had said. That was weak and pathetic. It reinforced the Republican lies..
Asleep at the Wheel!
That's what many voters are in the U.S. Is anyone really discussing issues? It is unbelievable that voters living in or near poverty still oppose policies such as Obamacare that could stand to help them substantially. Millions more are receiving good health care, but they're not speaking up. And Obama's policies helped boost the economy and save American industries which would have failed during the Great Recession. The only failure I see is that the Democrats fail to toot their own horn, and that hurts us all.
I think it is more a measure of disgust with the political system than anything else. The voting rate (37%) was the lowest for a mid-year election since 1942, when it was about 32%.
I continue to read your BLOG and am so glad to have someone sane sending thoughts to me. Everything you write supports my POV. You and Madeline are so evolved, interesting and lovely to follow online. Your life experiences are inspiring and educational.
I thank Barry, anonymous, Carol and Sandy for their kind words.
Carol, Cheryl and Scott make substantive points. Obama and the Democrats’ greatest failure was not to “toot their own horns," but instead to apologize for the President. Pathetic indeed.
And Scott is right, of course. We vote less and less, so what can we expect?
I appreciate Gordon’s comments in particular, because he is NOT one of “choir” to whom I preach. Yet he persists in keeping this blog’s dialogue open, in a civil and intelligent way, always making excellent points and pointing to a possible “third way.”
Thank you Tom for stating what seems obvious to me. I agree with you entirely!
Sad to see how quickly so many forget about the incompetent George W. Bush? An unnecessary war at huge cost in lives and billions compounded by a huge debt during the war and future costs to care for veterans. And then costs involved in Bushs recession.
They talk about the middle class, but forget that union jobs were the basis for so much of that. They have never cared about health care for any group but themselves.
Trickle down econimics failed during Reagns time and compounded the debt 4x. An austerity program such
Paul Ryan's budget failed Europe and led to more recession. Instead the preach liberty and freedom from regulations.
What hypocrisy!
Tom - one other comment - think of the lack of mandate - Mitch McConnell was supposed to be in a close race with Allison Grimes(she lost by 15 points), Governor Kasich won by 31 points - Peggy Noonan commented - "It was a message election. Sweeps like this come down to policy and governance. America on Tuesday told one party no, you’re not doing it right, we don’t like what we’re seeing, and your preoccupations (birth control, “War on Women”) are not our priorities." She went on to say - "What is in his interests is for him to go forward in a spirit of compromise and try to reach agreements on the Hill through negotiations. This would be a relief after six years of nonstop acrimony. Republicans need an end of acrimony too: They want to show that they’re not just shutdown artists, as their foes say, but that they are a governing party in whose hands the country is safe. "
Tom-
The GOP was supposed to lose governorships in Wisconsin and Florida - they did not. Sam Brownback which all the liberals said was a dead duck won in a walk. The GOP looks like they will end up with 54 members in the Senate - taking down such strong democratic stalwarts as the soon to be forgotten Senator from NC. The dems have pulled all their money from Louisiana understanding that the Senator from DC is not going to win the runoff. The close race in Georgia turned out to be a rout. Then there is the House where the largest GOP majority in almost a century is about to take office. Oh, and did I mention the 300 plus seats in the legislatures across the country. The President claimed in the middle of the election cycle that he was not on the ballot but his policies were - well guess what - his policies were rejected by huge margins all across the country. The President's churlish nonsensical press conference the next day showed him as someone who wanted to be president but did not want to do the job of president.
I hope the new leadership will do what they said they will do - to propose some interesting and creative solutions to the failed policies of the last six years. If the President wants to throw a temper tantrum like he did on Wednesday then he will be rightly thrown to the dustbin of history sitting next to Jimmy Carter.
To Jonathan:
apart from the first sentence of your first comment, which was offensive and which I deleted:
Your analysis is twofold: (1) an attempt to explain why the election DOES give a mandate to the new Republican-dominated congress and (2) continued, personal, ad hominem venom directed at President Obama.
Your error is simple: the people who voted on November 4 represent a small percentage of the total electorate, a group dominated by middle-class aging white men and by people who have been brainwashed into personal Obama-hatred and lied to by Fox News and Rush Limbaugh for 6 years.
As I said: No mandate.
I most certainly enjoyed your delightfully wicked and substantial commentary on the election and
American life. It surely echos my own feeling about the politics , policies ,possible future of the USA.
YEAH TOM!!! I agree with everything you said. Within weeks so many Americans will wake up and start saying "but I didn't want that!", but it will be too late. Just like when people used to say Reagan was such a nice man and such a good speaker, then get very upset with the things he did to hurt the average American and small business owner. Thank goodness the pendulum always swings back, just too bad that we will have to lose ground before starting to make things better again.
The Economy 101 By The Numbers Click Here This link puts it into layman's terms and it compares presidents.
Americans hate facts.
I hope people will click on Bastardo's link and his URL. He says it like it is!
Post a Comment
Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!