by Madeleine Kando
The world is facing a refugee crisis of biblical proportions. Although the press is full of images and stories of refugees trying to reach Europe on dinghy boats, or trek through the 'Balkan corridor', they are but a small fraction of the millions of people who have fled war zones in the Middle East.
Most of them end up in refugee camps in Turkey, Jordan or Lebanon, but living there year in year out, is a pretty bleak affair without prospects for a better future. So the logical next step is to go further afield, to Europe. America would be another option, were the Atlantic a little narrower.
The bulk of these refugees are from Syria, where a war has been raging since 2011. It is estimated that 60 million people have been displaced worldwide**, which is approximately the entire population of France. The last time the world saw such a large displacement, was during the Völksverwanderung in the late Roman period, which destroyed an entire civilization and replaced it with the 'Dark Ages', setting Europe back a millennium.
Germany's latest magnanimous gesture to offer asylum to 800,000 refugees has had the effect of shaming more reactionary responses to the crisis, in particular Hungary's. But it also creates a problem for Germany itself, and might eventually kill the goose that lays the golden egg. Although Berlin wants to create a quota system to share the refugee burden, once you are in Europe, there are no borders to stop you from going where the jobs are, and the bulk of the jobs are in Germany... until they are all taken.
I myself, am a post World War 2 refugee, part of a human wave that tried to escape the newly established Communist regime in Hungary and other 'satellite' countries. It took decades to implement a system that could handle the refugee crisis during that time. It was also a time when everything had to be rebuilt and economic growth was enormous.
Now we are seeing a Europe that is overwhelmed, unprepared and in discord. Although Mama Merkel's intentions are laudable, it will not be enough. The Dublin Regulation, which requires refugees to stay in the first European country they arrive in until their asylum claims are processed, has been thrown out of the window, without anything tangible to replace it.
America is used to accepting large groups of immigrants. It had a gateway for millions of immigrants called Ellis Island, it is a unified country. In Europe, immigration rules are vague and unenforced. There are no ID cards, no requirement to learn the language of the host country, no particularly strong incentives to integrate. We are seeing a continent trying to make decisions very quickly, without democratic accountability, a Europe that has not yet been able to go beyond its national identities. It is trying to adhere to basic human values, but without a less sentimental response to the situation, Europe might have to return to a pre-Schengen agreement time, a time of fences and borders.
Brett Stephens, in an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, says what no one else has so far admitted: that this is basically all about security. Europe has been taking it easy, since the Second World War, letting others (read the US) take care of the unpleasant business of keeping it secure from those who might want to cause it harm. 'Europe's openness rests on America's strength', says Stephens.
Now that America is choosing more and more to emulate Europe's 'sitting on the sidelines' attitude, the tolerance and generosity that Germany is exhibiting will soon evaporate, like the mirage that it is. Europe cannot have it both ways: it can not remain open and borderless without someone protecting that openness, 'a virtue purchased through strength'.
Then, there is the question of the 'clash of civilizations'. In an article entitled: 'It's the beginning of the end of Europe', Israeli journalist Noah Klieger writes: 'The Europeans are failing to realize that Muslim refugees will lead to the complete disappearance of their countries' tradition, culture and progress and to the establishment of an Islamic rule across the entire continent.'
There are fears that the refugees' religious beliefs will affect our western values and will change them for the worst: women's rights, religious intolerance etc. Who will influence the hundreds of thousand of refugee children who will settle in the West? Our values or theirs? Is this paranoia or are those legitimate questions?
Only time will tell...
leave comment here
** I corrected this: previously I had said that there are 60 million refugees in the Middle East. This figure is for the whole world.
13 comments:
I am glad to say that Missoula is adopting 10 families, through our Jeannette Rankin (first woman in Congress) Peace Center.
Scott and I were in Budapest the second and third weeks of September, and listened to many opinions. Demagogues abound.
This issue should be front and center. I agree with the Popes message of acceptance and inclusion. We are each part of the human family and share the same earth and its' global resources. We each were immigrants at one point in our experience ( voluntary migration, exile, human captivity via slave labor, asylum etc.,.)to America. My concern is with the way in which we talk about population size and human accountability regarding this. Also we need to pay attention to shifting demographics and care to make healthy investments in public health policies that could successfully manage whatever challenge or crisis that comes to our brothers and sisters that cross into America's shores and/ or any other shore that houses human populations. The WHO, World Health Organization needs to get involved in this human crisis. We are all in this as a global community. This crisis could be a living hell for any of our families depending on where and when we were born and our station in life. It is time to roll out the red carpet of human compassion as we have all had to stand on it at some point in historical time. Right?
Gail
Nostradamus' prophecy will come true!
Aycke Maria Smook
Bergen NH Netherlands
This is indeed a crisis. There are a couple of issues that I think you did not point out. Logically, the Islamic countries should be taking a hand in solving this problem but they are not. That does not mean we should not lend a hand but we should urge Islamic regimes to take a role in this. No matter how many we take we need to be careful, we should do at least reasonable screening to make sure we are not importing jihadists.
The numbers on how many are in this exodus are large but I suspect if you did the research the cumulative migration from Europe to the US was of similar proportions. The numbers between 1870 and 1920 were somewhere in the range of 12 million. Many of those did not fully integrate for almost 100 years. Interestingly, in spite of what the Trumpster has argued - recent research suggests that this generation of immigrants is acquiring English and inter-marrying much quicker than previous generations.
Interesting points you touch on.
Gail
Even though I agree with this article I find the term "mama Merkel" somewhat slanderous - even hateful
Regarding the refugee crisis…oh it's so sad and i feel very helpless. We can talk about possible remedies and actions "we" can take, but it's really up to the middle east countries, the eu and the eastern european countries to solve this ongoing and distressing problem.
Theoretically, the most obvious and humane solution is for each nation to take an agreed upon percentage of a nation's total population. Easy to say, almost impossible to get countries to agree to, let alone implement. how to get that done?? It seems like the most Americans can do is make donations to non-profit relief and medical agencies. even if the US agrees to take 1/2 million refugees, our corrupt and ineffective immigration agency takes up to 2 years to "vet" the immigrants. Your tired, your hungry, your poor your huddled masses yearning to be free.
The article below quotes Donald Tusk, who is the president of the European Council.
We're doomed: EU chief fears union will COLLAPSE over migrant crisis
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/607595/Migrant-crisis-EU-lost-control-borders-danger-collapse
Thanks for the link, anonymous. The Express is a Tabloid newspaper, comparable to the Enquirer, so we might want to take what they print with a small dose of reservation.
Germany Already Regretting ‘Open Door’ Policy to ‘Refugees’ http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2015/09/26/germany-already-regretting-open-door-policy-to-refugees/
Just a few days ago, 17 migrants drowned off the coast of Turkey, mostly women and children. How desperate do you have to be to opt for such a risky journey?
Contrary to what the PJ Media says, Merkel has not changed her policy. She temporarily closed the border with Hungary because of a lack of manpower to process everyone. She has her heart and her mind in the right place. The problem is with the EU's lack of a unified immigration policy.
After the Second World War, millions of refugees were repatriated to Western Europe. What if their policy had been to close borders, refuse asylum and create a climate of fear and paranoia? Millions of people would have ended up dead or would have been gobbled up by the Marxist regimes of Eastern Europe.
Pieter: I didn't mean to be disrespectful of Merkel. She has acquired that nickname in the press and maybe I should not have parroted that expression.
The bigger problem than the rising number of refugees in EU is the whole reason why they had been running away from the Middle East (mainly due ISIS and other affiliated terrorist organizations). The world powers (US + EU + Russian + China) need to unite in some coalition format and hit the “daesh” with bigger, deadlier force + ground troops to recapture the key cities in Syria and Iraq. Until the ISIS won’t be eliminated in Raqqa and Mosul the number of refugees won’t decrease and the problems associated with it will only intensify on the EU societies, economies and social welfare system. It strains the financial resources in any country and assimilation of migrants also becomes much tougher issue, when you are dealing with such a high number of influx.
Post a Comment
Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!