Just a few words about Thursday’s Brexit disaster:
As the American comedian Andy Borowitz just wrote, the British have lost the right to claim that Americans are dumber than they are:
“Luxuriating in the superiority of their intellect over Americans” has long been a favorite pastime in Britain... But, according to Alistair Dorrinson, a pub owner in North London, British voters have done irreparable damage to the ‘most enjoyable sport this nation has ever known: namely, treating Americans like idiots’....In the face of this startling display of national idiocy, Dorrinson still mustered some of the resilience for which the British people are known. ‘This is a dark day’ he said. ‘But I hold out hope that, come November, Americans could become dumber than us once more.’ How will America reclaim the title? Obvious: Elect Donald Trump as our 45th president.
It’s obvious that xenophobia was not just the most important factor in the English people’s decision to leave Europe, but that it was the ONLY reason. There is simply no other rational argument for this decision. It benefits NO ONE - not Britain, not Europe, not the rest of the world; the consequences will be bad economically, culturally and in every other conceivable way. And for all parties. Today’s crashing Pound Sterling and worldwide stock markets are just the beginning.
Scotland and Ulster voted in favor of remaining in the European Union, so now they - Scotland at least - can hold another vote to secede. It is a sad thing to see the fragmentation of Britain.
We live in an age of fragmentation and centrifugal forces - there was the violent dismemberment of Yugoslavia, there is chronic turmoil in the Middle East, the Soviet Union fell apart, and the list goes on. There are now over one hundred more countries in the world than when I was young.
The wacko birds in Northern California want to secede and create their own state, the “Republic of Jefferson.” Never to be outdone in the insanity department, Texas is also thinking about secession. Two new European terms have just been coined: Nexit (Netherlands exit from Europe) and Frexit (French exit). Of course, so far, none of this needs to be taken seriously.
But what IS a serious problem all across the Western world - Europe and North America - is the emergence of a terrible new motivation: The perceived threat from the non-Western world: the economics of globalization, which cause western de-industrialization, and the threat of refugees and immigrants.
What the ENTIRE world is experiencing is a resurgence of NATIONALISM - I prefer to call it TRIBALISM.
First of all, just think about the illogic here: If every nation/tribe feels that it must protect its purity and superiority, that doesn’t work, does it? The Hungarians want to keep Hungarian blood and culture pure, and so do the English, and the French, and the Dutch, and the Poles, and the Arabs, and the Russians, and everyone else. This is like Lake Wobegon, where all the children are above average.
More seriously: When I grew up, we lived in an age of optimism: The world, we felt, was moving toward UNIFICATION. Nationalism and war were the ways of the past.
Today, the trend is the opposite. The people of the West - British, Dutch, French, Hungarian or American - are fearful and angry. The problem is that the diagnosis and the remedy they choose for their perceived plight are wrong. Brexit is a Trump-like response. It has nothing to do with lofty ideas such as freedom and independence. It is a flight into nationalism, tribalism and xenophobia, all the things that have plagued humanity throughout history, things to which many people wish to return.
I blame Prime Minister Cameron for this. For holding the referendum. Where is it written that a majority of voters cannot be wrong? I know, I know, I am committing a sacrilege by questioning “democracy.” Well, all I can say is: Big mistake, England leave comment here
Synopsis: Brexit is a terrible accident. The English people made a big mistake. Their decision was based on xenophobia, and it will benefit no one, not the English, not the Europeans. The entire Western world is experiencing a resurgence of nationalism, tribalism and centrifugal forces. This does not bode well for the future.
14 comments:
The Brits are not xenophobic, they are megaxenophobic (the fear of millions of foreigners). The population of foreign born has gone from 4 million to over 8 million from 1994 to current...too much in that period of time, and it was projected to get worse, because many refugees have rudimentary knowledge of English and therefore once in the EU they hope to get to England.
And even worse the EU was regulating electric tea pots out of existence!
I must disagree with the above comment.The ignorant have been conned .
The government has now informed us that they will not be restricting immigration .
They will not be spending money saved on Europe on the health service.So those who wanted to rid us of foreigners have not succeeded .
By appealing to our lowest instincts the right wing of our government got the turkeys to vote for Christmas ,wrecked our economy
and made us despised and mocked by all decent people As always in these situations "cui bono.? "I do not know the answer to that ,do you?They still seem pleased by their victory .Also our Labour Party has been taken over by slallinists ,who want to deselect all our moderate MPs.All is not well in the uk. Very worrying times. What is an electric teapot?
It is a tour de farce to call 17 million people 'xenophobic' and be done with it. Did we forget that this referendum is based on our most cherished principle: 'the will of the people?" To brush their vote aside as motivated by xenophobia is simplistic and wrong. Although the Leave camp's motivation is far more nuanced, there IS an immigration issue and blaming the messenger won't get rid of the problem.
https://youtu.be/9mWUoi22_AY
The above video argues the opposite view. Unification isn't the same as solidarity and striving for peace and distribution of food, housing, healthcare and education in the world.
Cooporation is essential in this world, however to achieve the above-- and Europe can be a good force, but not automatically.....
Jerke de Vries
I hopefully predict that Britain wont trigger Article 50 for at least 10 years if ever. To do so would weaken their bargaining position with the EU. It seems no one knows who can actually trigger it without consensus in parliament anyway. I think that perhaps this referendum was dreamed up and played with,(apart from the obvious private political reasons) to keep manipulable politicians in jobs. Direct democracy has failed. 52/48 on a bunch of lies just shows that, alas we won't be able to do away with politicians and vote for major issues online after all.
At least there will be plenty of work for lawyers trying to tidy up the British book of rules. I just hope we get another referendum in the next 30 years when most of the 52% are dead and that, for the sake of my children they take us back.
(We/I will try to become Spanish citizens, or Scottish if they somehow manage to stay in.)
Once again you put my feelings into words. Great blog post. I hope to quote from it in a speech to my Toastmasters club.
Valid responses, by and large, especially those that agree with me (haha).
I suppose I shouldn’t try to be a mind reader and dismiss all Brexit supporters as xenophobic simpletons. Yes, Europe does have an immigration issue. And yes, Britain was perhaps putting more (money) into Europe than getting out of it. Large and diverse confederacies involve some redistribution of wealth. In the US, my state (rich California) pays far more in taxes to the federal government than it receives back in services, whereas piss-poor Mississippi gets a lot more back from Washington than it pays in. So Britain didn’t like to support poor places like Greece (although Wales, for one, was a beneficiary of the exchange with Europe, so its vote for Brexit was a case of cutting its nose to spite its face).
Anyway, I am happy that Tomi and I agree. As I said, the outcome of the vote is a big mistake. Let’s just hope that the consequences can be mitigated, somehow.
Dear Prof. Kando,
I'm so glad to see your post about this topic. I concur, much of the motivation for demanding a vote in the first place- and rallying a voting bloc to support it- is a flight towards nationalism and xenophobia.
But I wish to add something else that might help us to understand why the vote garnered so much support amongst Britain's electorate. As a (recent) outsider in the UK for seven years (2007-2014), I certainly witnessed racism and xenophobia. People said awful things to me sometimes (and at any moment)- and I'm white. I'd go to school all day and work all night in a bar and be terrified that someone would hear my accent and say something snarky. I shudder to think what is regularly said to nonwhite persons there.
However, I believe that the significant number of votes in favor of Brexit was brought on by the extreme austerity measures that the Tories have pedaled for years. George Osborne's fiscal policy was to cut spending, esp in social programs, research, industry, and education, even as forecasters warned against it, the IMF among them. While our stimulus packages from 2008 adopted a Keynesian approach, investing in key areas- foremost among them technology and research, the Brits took the opposite agenda. They leaned in to the recession, causing it only to get worse- and squeezing their most vulnerable in the process. I witnessed draconian social cuts (my favourite is the Bedroom Tax). They even cut government funding of higher education. The job market plummeted. Recent graduates had nowhere to go. I saw two friends deported, even though they are married to UK citizens and recently earned their PhDs in the UK- for not earning enough money. Meaning: over 35,000 GBP per year, a very high salary by UK standards (think 60,000 USD). Colleges were screaming that they wouldn't be able to keep zero-contract-hours staff on the payroll, who are largely non-EU (American, Canadian, etc). The Tories didn't appear to listen to any of it. If you'd like an example, Kew Gardens is a world class research institution reduced to paperclips.
It’s a shame that our media hasn't reported on what’s been going on across the pond, because I consider those policies to offer a perfect example of what not to do. And an apt demonstration of how Republican economic policies would shake out in the not-too-distant future. We could also look to Kansas and Oklahoma for the same example, I suppose, though I rarely see those instances cited.
I think that this context explains a bit more of the vote. After years of squeezing the poor and middle class, UK voters were asked one simple question: do you want things to stay as they are, or do you want certain change? In that light, who can blame them? Protesting doesn't have the same impact in the UK as it does here. Protests from 2008 have done nothing. The Tories were clearly going to forge ahead with the cuts, regardless, even as the economy remained dead in the water. There was nothing that could stop the charge- even emergency meetings demanded by the World Bank. And so, on voting day, faced with a simple, "in/out" option: I think most people said, "out". Much of the logic was surely based in fear of outsiders and wrath towards foreign persons, which their media had been drumming up for ages. But at the heart of the issue were a population of individuals who felt they had nowhere to go but up.
I'd be very interested to hear your thoughts on this element. As always, thank you so much for your thoughtful posts! It's great to know that I'm not alone in thinking that the whole world is a little bit nuts at the moment.
Best wishes!
Jess Whalen
To clarify, I'm certainly opposed to Britain's decision to leave the EU. I lived in Scotland, and I'm certain that more than 95% of my friends voted to stay- even the ones who live outwith Scotland, and who are not Scottish. But the vote has really thrown all of us for a loop, and I think that the economic dimension offers some explanation as to... WHAT HAPPENED?? :)
Hi Tom,
My opinion: The British screwed up. It's about creating borders. We have ours and we don't want to share the wealth in this digital time and age.
There is more to gain in unity than fragmentation. The most powerful military nation and better off economically should always lend a hand.
For the British - OK have it your way, but when World War III starts they will asking the good old USA to bail them out, just like WW I, WW II, and as with Argentina.
Thanks for the info.
Funny!
TOUCHE!
It’s unforgivable that I did not acknowledge Jess Whalen’s outstanding analysis of the British situation sooner. My excuse is that we were traveling (in Hawaii), and then we were incredibly busy after our return.
Anyway, yes, Jess is absolutely spot on with his assessment. He spent seven years over there, and in Scotland, of all places! One of my favorite places on earth. We have been there several times.
Jess’ main point is perhaps that we Americans can learn from Britain how NOT to do it. So true!
Post a Comment
Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!