Saturday, February 25, 2017
Evil Rising
by Tom Kando
I just spent nearly a month in Europe. It’s interesting to compare notes:
Europe is also experiencing a resurgence of nativism, xenophobia, anxiety and rightward politics among its still dominant white bourgeoisie. Like the US, Europe is also flirting with neo-fascism. Holland has its Geert Wilders, France has its Marine Le Pen, Hungary has its Viktor Orbán, etc. These are all far-right demagogues, already in power (Orban) or likely to win upcoming elections (Wilders, Le Pen).
Why is this happening?
There are the obvious alleged reasons, ceaselessly reiterated by the pundits. These include:
1. The threat of foreign influx - largely Muslims in Europe, Latinos in the US. In other words, the demographic threat to the primacy of the traditional, white, European-American dominant majority. This is aided and abetted by the ceaseless chatter about terrorism.
2. De-industrialization due to globalization and automation, greatly increasing economic insecurity.
3. Social change, including the decline of patriarchy, which makes men angry.
In sum: A feeling of being threatened, of losing ground, especially among groups that previously held all the cards.
Does history repeat itself? Yes and no. At least, there is sometimes a sense of deja-vu all over again. Sometimes, one of the new “caudillos” remind us of Mussolini, maybe even some of Hitler’s mannerisms, or at least strongmen like Franco and Peron. A reminder of Italy and Germany in the 1930s. Of nationalistic demagogues such as Charles Lindbergh, and fascist youth movements such as the Hungarian Arrow Cross (today’s Jobbik party).
Let’s just say that the fascist impulse is on the rise again in the West, certainly among the traditionally dominant white population.
Social scientists have analyzed this recurring tendency (see for instance William Kornhauser). One could almost construct an ideal type, a la Max Weber.
Of course, history never really repeats itself; it’s never “the same.” However, history has certain enduring themes. This is probably because there is such a thing as human nature. We are both good and evil. That is what makes us human and what distinguishes us from (other) animals. Other species are neither good nor evil. We are both.
We periodically turn massively evil. The last time that this happened was in the 1930s. It is happening again now.
But what is the ESSENCE of the rightward movement of so many people today, this malevolent tendency which crops up every once in a while, each time in a different form but each time also exhibiting similarities?
Well, obviously, it is first and foremost ANGER and resentment. The anger is self-righteous. It claims to be justified.
Initially, what you have is a dominant group that never questions its right to BE dominant - the white patriarchal ruling class, the bourgeois middle class, the slave-owning ruling class in the Ante-Bellum South, the nobility of lore, etc. Then, social change occurs. Certain forces try to bring more diverse people to the table. Women; hitherto oppressed and despised minorities (e. g. gypsies); groups selected as scapegoats (Christians, Jews, Muslims). Minorities whose members are entrepreneurial and successful and who therefore trigger jealousy (Huguenots, Jews, gays), etc.
The powerful groups that have hitherto never had to question their own rights, their right to use physical violence upon their wives and children, their right to get preferential treatment on the job market, their right to enjoy the respect and the fear of categories lower on the totem pole - these groups then become angry.
In America, for example, the reactionary (and largely white male) ruling class says that it's fed up with political correctness. These people complain that they are tired of always hearing about the rights of women, of minorities, of LGBTQ, etc. "What about us?" they ask; "don't we also have rights?"
The only demographic group in America whose life expectancy is now declining are white males. But the reason? Not that society is unkind to them. It is because of too much alcohol, smoking, drugs, violence, crime, guns, and unhealthy behavior. And yes, these bad behaviors are undoubtedly caused by low morale.
The “angry class” hates intellectuals, Hollywood, the media, university professors, artists. This has always been so, particularly in America (see Richard Hofstadter). They are angry because those effete intellectuals and movie actors always make fun of them - the "rednecks," the "cowboys," the "Joe's". They understand that they are held in low esteem by the cultural elite.
But here is the thing: Being angry does not ipso facto make you RIGHT; you may have a grievance, but it may not be legitimate. Such anger - be it that of the German middle class in the 1930s or the American white male today - stems from ignorance. It is evil.
Yes, human nature is both good and evil. Many people - perhaps a majority of people, certainly a majority of men - enjoy violence, enjoy inflicting and witnessing pain and suffering. The Roman gladiatorial combats; modern popular culture; the insane amount of violence in 99% of all movies and TV shows. Almost ALL men enjoy viewing if not participating in bloodshed. Are all men sadists?
So this working and middle class (male) anger that results in Trumpism and crypto-fascism should not be dignified with excuses such as: The loss of jobs due to deindustrialization, or the influx of refugees from Muslim areas , or whatever other explanations have been offered ad nauseam to explain it. This anger is NOT justified. It is an excuse to misbehave, to go retrograde politically, to deny science and factual knowledge, to deny justice, equality and love of your fellow man.
The only remedy is education.
The masses of Trump deplorables (and Wilders and Orban and Le Pen followers, and those who voted for Brexit, and the Russians who adore Putin, etc.) are as wrong as the sect that anticipated the end of the world in the 1950s, and waited for the arrival of alien saviors for their own select group. They were delusional, and their delusion was not readily curable. When the prophecy failed, they did not admit their error; they doubled down on their delusion; they just postponed the date of their prophecy (See Leon Festinger).
The urge of groups such as the Alt-right is not to “make America Great again;” it is not to fix things; it is to PUNISH hated groups. It is the “Samson phenomenon”: To them, draining the swamp means bringing the whole house down. They do not aim to fix Obamacare; they aim to REPEAL it, period, and the hell with the 30 million people who will lose their medical insurance, 50,000 of whom will die as a result.
So the remedy is not to dignify this mass anger and say that these people have legitimate grievances. To the contrary, the remedy is to educate them and to convince them that they are wrong. That there IS global warming; that the earth is NOT flat. That people of color, Muslims, women, gays and all others are EXACTLY the same as THEY are - human beings with the same needs, desires, and rights. There is no "Other." We are all in the same boat. Human equality is a scientific fact, and the only thing that remains to be done is to educate people to that knowledge.
© Tom Kando 2017;All Rights Reserved.
leave comment here
25 comments:
Hi Tom,
I fear that you're right - except for the fix. One central premise in your case is that they don't listen to us. They don't want to be "educated," and will not be.
Hi Dave,
others have reacted the same way you do. I (somewhat) share your pessimism, except that I want to retain SOME hope. Perhaps I should say that IF there is any hope, it resides in education, even though there is of course no guarantee...
Hi. I think the internet maybe partly to blame. At this early stage in its history it mainly aims to please. People are being told what they want to hear because they are more likely to log on and create advertising revenue. What bullshit people are logging onto is irrelevant to advertisers and they're profiteering minions; so in other words if I'm a little bit scared of purple fairies all I need to do is log on to "Hangpurplefairies.com" to discover that not only are they terrorist communists but that they will almost certainly eat my children if given the chance.
So education is a great plan but students will be sidetracked while doing online research.
The internet, ironically, is driving us apart. Tribalism rules because although the web might one day be the sum of human knowledge, for now its mostly just other stuff and unfortunately pineapple-pen and gory beheadings sell advertising and who has any energy left to (read?) fox news?
Excellent analysis. Thanks
Thanks for your thoughtful look at this scary development
Great piece, Tom.
I thank Tomi, Margo, Carol Anita and Dave M. for their support.
Tomi’s comments about the role of the internet are intriguing. Yes, whether the internet puts mankind a step forward or not remains to be seen.
The same question was raised at the advent of TV, in the 1950s. By now, my blunt answer to THAT question would be that, on balance, we would be better off without television. There are a few people who have no television, and I admire and envy them. I am too weak to wean myself off this nasty habit.
Regarding the Internet (and social media), who knows?
Being old, I am of course totally biased in favor of reading - newspapers, books, anything.
A long time ago, before the internet, Marshall McLuhan coined the phrase “the medium is the message.” This seems to be as true as ever.
Funny, every Trump supporter I know has been very happy the past month; it's the Lefties that are going through the "angry" meltdowns (they need to relax and ignore the fake news media for awhile, particularly your sister who is going through PTSD))
I am happy about anonymous' comment, as it indicates that I am not just preaching to the choir...
Funnier still, was the hilarious ending to tonight’s Oscars (hey, we screwed up, you Black guys won). After the recriminations of last year’s #Oscarssowhite and the feigning, condescending comments of the guilt ridden Lefties tonight, I’ve got to wonder how many Black nominees are wondering whether they were being judged on their merits or was it just the Left’s attempt to avoid appearing racist again.
Excellent! so true. Should be published in all newspapers. thanks
I don't think we will fix this problem by picking sides and saying "my side is best." These political groups are like children that each want to use the government for their own purposes and let the other side pay the taxes for it. Children become angry, make jokes about each other, and demand everyone see the world their way. Until we learn to transcend group consciousness and see the points and concerns of each party that way loving adults try to raise their children, we will continue to see a national meltdown into identity politics. We need to make sure the laws treat individual equally, regardless of what groups they identify with, and not give any groups an official "establishment" role in politics.
Amen!
Tom,
An excellent essay. We live in very troubled times.
I thank Linda, Bruce and Don G. for their support.
As to anonymous #2, what he writes doesn’t matter: Moonlight is probably an excellent movie (I haven’t seen it) as is La La Land. They both deserve the Oscar. And yes, it’s important that African-American contributions to cinema be fully recognized. So everything is hunky-dory - the “Left” did just fine.
Gordon, as always, tries to be reasonable, “split the difference,” etc. I praise his valiant efforts, but I am partial. In my view, liberals are by and large right, and conservatives are by and large wrong. We have written about 700 articles on this blog explaining why we feel that way.
Oh, I so loved that velvet glove tonight. Can't wait for the 10k ICE to be hired and trained so that the iron fist can be applied. America for Americans!
Hoooo Hooo Hooo Haa Haaaaa Haaaaa Haaaaa!!!!! (Rubs his immigrant or child-of-immigrant hands together menacingly).
Or her hands. Or child of a child of...
In response to anonymous:
Are you sure you mean "America for Americans," or "America for Russians"?
Just as long as they are legal! Deport the illegals!!!
I suppose the distinction between legal and illegal is meaningful. I remember arguing this point in my classes, and my more radical students gave me a bad time for doing so. I noted that as an immigrant myself, I went by the book: I waited 5 years before being re-admitted to the US and 5 more years after that before being naturalized.
However, I am also concerned about some other aspects of the whole immigration issue. Without rehashing everything here, just the following:
1. By definition, ALL 11 million illegal immigrants to this country are criminals, so if Trump’s policy of “deporting all criminal immigrants” is to be taken literally, they would all be deported, which is nonsense.
2. Immigrants - legal or illegal - are not a threat: their crime rate is lower than that of Americans born in America.
3. The positive economic contribution of immigrants - legal or not - is greater than their cost.
4. Throughout its history, America’s lifeblood has been immigration. That is how the country became “number one.” Cutting off or slowing down this process will weaken and harm the country.
1)While the deportation of 11 million illegals may be impractical, I will be satisfied with making it so uncomfortable for illegals that it will force them into hiding, dissuade them from using public resources, make them yearn for their mother countries, and dissuade other illegals from coming.
2)The statement that illegal aliens commit less crimes than native born is only a function of America’s ”Original Sin” of slavery. Illegal aliens may commit fewer crimes than Blacks, but illegals certainly commit far more crimes than native born Caucasian and Asian citizens. Since we are stuck with the indigenous Black crime problem, it is insane for us to contribute to that problem by letting more illegals in.
3)Legal aliens may contribute more than they cost, but illegal aliens cost us more than they contribute. Illegal aliens making minimum wage and earning perhaps $20k per year, in no way contribute enough taxes to cover the $10k per year teaching expense of one kid.
4)America became number one in the 19th and 20th century because of legal European immigration, and even then, Ellis island was used for “vetting” qualified and rejecting non-contributing immigrants.
To anonymous:
Your rebuttals are honest. I disagree with them, and I question many of your facts.
Regarding #2:
Conservatives often argue this way, when they discuss rates of crime, public health, voting results, etc:
If you exclude African-Americans and other minorities, America’s life expectancy surpasses Japan and Western Europe; if you exclude blacks (and Hispanics), our crime rate is no higher than Europe; if you exclude California (and New York), Trump won the popular vote.
This is like saying:
“If you exclude the states where Hilary won, then Trump won;”
“if you exclude people with poor health, America’s public health is excellent...”
“If you exclude poor people, Americans are rich.”
Doesn’t “American” mean ALL Americans?
American means ALL American citizens, natural born or naturalized, it does not include legal or illegal aliens.
Post a Comment
Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!