Tuesday, May 30, 2017

Let's Raise Taxes Already!



The Trump disaster is upon us. More specifically, the Trumponomics disaster is upon us. That is, the President and his Republican goons are going to try to pass a massive tax cut to benefit the super rich.

You don’t have to be an economist to see why this is a disaster. And I am not even talking about the immorality and  the injustice of making the rich even richer and the poor even poorer. No, what I am talking about is what this is going to do to the federal budget and the national economy.

One of America’s most obstinate problems is that its government is increasingly broke. It is broke  the same way that you would be broke if you kept increasing your debt year after year, and kept spending more and more of your income to finance your debt,  i.e. on  interest payments.  Each year you would have less  money left over to buy things. This is a vicious circle. Currently, Uncle Sam spends each year nearly  half a trillion (!) dollars  more than it collects  in taxes.

In order to continue to provide all the necessary services, the  government has  to spend more than it collects. To make up the shortfall, it has to borrow money  by issuing treasury bonds. It has been doing this for decades, and  the accumulated federal debt keeps growing. It now stands at $20 trillion, which is roughly 106% of the GDP.


Table One shows what’s been happening since the 1960s:

                                                        Table I: Growth of US Federal Deficit: 1960 to 2016

Years
Amount borrowed
President(s); event(s)
Cumulative Debt;
% of GDP
1960-62
$22 billion =
$7.5 billion per year
Kennedy
$309 billion
= 51% of GDP
1963-68
$50 billion =
$8.3 billion per year
Johnson; Vietnam escalation
$359 billion
= 38% of GDP
1969-73
$61 billion = $12.2 billion per year
Nixon; Vietnam war
$420 billion
= 30% of GDP
1974-76
$134 billion = $44.4 billion per year
Ford; Vietnam war
$554 billion
= 30% of GDP
1977-80
$228 billion = $57 billion per year
Carter; Inflation
$782 billion
= 30% of GDP
1981-88
$1260 billion = $158 billion per  yr.
Reagan; “Starve the beast;” Tax cuts
$2.1 trillion
= 34% of GDP
1989-92
$994 billion = $249 billion per yr.
Bush I
$3.1 trillion
= 50% of GDP
1993-2000
$2.3 trillion =
$287 billion per year
Clinton
$5.4 trillion
=  56% of GDP
2001-08
$4.5 trillion =
half a trillion per yr.
Bush II; 9/11; Wars;
Tax cuts
$9.9 trillion
=  68% of GDP
2009-16
$9.5 trillion = $1.24 trillion  per yr.
Obama; Great Recession
$19.4 trillion
= 106% of GDP

The last time this country enjoyed a federal surplus was during a few of the Clinton years, when the Cold War had ended and we reaped a “peace dividend.” After that,  all hell broke loose - 9/11, several wars, the great recession, etc. And even though the  government was called upon to meet an  unprecedented number of new responsibilities, politicians such as George W. Bush enacted vast tax CUTS. Today, the ruling party and its know-nothing  President continue to bark up that very same  wrong tree, clamoring for more tax  cuts. Obama, of course, had no choice but to also contribute to the debt. His Keynesian  response to the Great Recession was what saved us all.    

But make no mistake about it: We ARE going broke. The government is spending a greater proportion of its income on servicing its growing debt,  and it is  therefore increasingly unable to meets is responsibilities to the American people. This is reminiscent of what was happening in France in the second half of the 18th century, which  led to the French  Revolution. Louis XVI  and Marie Antoinette paid dearly for bankrupting the state.

The list below shows the steady increase in the government’s interest payments over the past 66 years:

Year                Fed. % payments:
1950                            $6     billion
1960                            $14   billion
1970                            $35   billion
1980                            $113 billion
1990                            $293 billion
2000                            $356 billion
2010                            $395 billion
2011                            $416 billion
2012                            $420 billion
2013                            $422 billion
2014                            $431 billion
2015                            $440 billion
2016                            $454 billion

The growing cost of servicing the debt is as wasteful as burning dollar bills - by the billions! All this money could be spent on services, on the safety nets that are more and more needed by our increasingly impoverished population, on science, education, health care, infrastructure, you name it.

How much of its money does the government waste in this manner? Just take a look at a recent (2015) federal budget:
The total size of the budget is about $4 trillion. Below is a list of  the major budgetary categories:

1. Social Security: 33.3%
2. Medicare and health: 27.4%
3. Military: 15.9%
4.Interest payment: 6 %*
5. V A benefits: 4.2%
6. Food and Agriculture: 3.5%
7. Education.:  2.7%
8. Transportation:  2.2%
9. Housing and Community: 1.6%
10. International affairs: 1.3%
11. Energy and Environment: 1.2%
12. Science: .8%
* This source understates the amount spent on debt servicing.  Like all borrowers, the government has benefitted from the extremely low interest rates of recent years. Sooner or later the rates will rise, and the government’s interest payments will skyrocket.
Even so, interest payment is already the fourth largest expense on the list, exceeding all categories except Social Security, Medicare and  military spending.
Imagine what wonderful things the government could fund with the hundreds of billions of dollars it wastes on %? How much scientific research? How many college scholarships? How many roads and bridges? How much new housing? How much on  renewable energy?  How many improvements to  the national parks? Public transportation?  Support for arts and  music? Affordable universal health care?

The downward spiral of out-of-control borrowing can only be stopped through a combination of (1) belt tightening and (2) major tax increase, if only temporarily. Debt financing is already beginning to  crowd out even the most essential services and safety nets. This the meaning of the cruel Republican  efforts to cut back Medicaid, to repeal Obamacare, to abolish defined-benefits retirement plans, to cut and cut whatever basic services and safety nets help the downtrodden, while at the same further reducing the taxes of the rich. 
Quite the opposite is needed: A massive tax increase, hopefully a temporary one, to eliminate the debt, to break the vicious cycle. This shouldn’t be  difficult, especially if done progressively. After all, there is an obscene concentration of wealth in this country. 40 years ago, the average CEO made about 30 times the salary of his average employee. Now, that ratio is 300! Can  a CEO not get by on a million and a half a year? Must he make ten times that much?

© Tom Kando 2017;All Rights Reserved

 leave comment here

7 comments:

Dave said...

right on!

madeleine kando said...

The budget that Trump proposes, is so unbelievably stupid, that it's laughable. He not only discounts the revenue loss from his proposed tax cuts in his calculation, but is adding to the defense budget and border security by taking away from most non-defense government agencies. 31% from the EPA!

It may reduce our federal debt, but at what cost? In your article you don't mention the most obvious way to do this, which is reduce our military budget and cap the 'tax expenditures' that allow the rich to deduct from their taxes.

Belt tightening has not had a positive effect on the economies of many countries (Greece). Raising taxes on the middle class is not the answer either, since we already pay an excessive share. Increasing corporate taxes and taxes on the super-rich as well as reducing our military budget will work.

Scott said...

Nice analytic piece. Thanks for this. As someone once said, "Taxes are the price we pay for civilization," which would suggest this is not a very civilized country.

Tom Kando said...

Thanks for your comments, people.

I agree with Madeleine on everything.
That’s why I start out talking about the disaster of Trumponomics.

But my intent in this short piece was to focus on ONE aspect of the problem - the need for the federal government to somehow raise its income.

It was not my intent, here, to discuss the second part of the equation - the need to cut federal expenses SOMEWHERE. Nor was it my intent to specify where the cuts should occur - although I agree with Madeleine’s priorities.

Getting back to my main point - the need to raise taxes: I also agree with Madeleine as to where and how this should be done. That’s why I call for a progressive tax increase and I remind the readers of this country’s terrible concentration of wealth.

All I am trying to focus on in this article is the need to raise more revenue (as happened for example in California, under governor Brown’s wise stewardship), so as to break the downward spiral of indebtedness.

Gordon said...

Tom, I have always felt that it is a conflict of interest and immoral for a government entity that prints money to borrow that money. Neither the Republicans or Democrats have been able to control their borrowing, it is just a matter of who they give the money they take to--the rich, the poor, or cronies.

Individual states, on the other hand, have to balance their budget better because if they don't print money they go bankrupt more normally--like many of the poorly-managed California pension funds.

This leads me to question whether the next wave, that may really mess up the government in Washington, will be the adoption of currencies like BitCoin that governments can't control or manipulate. Electronic currencies may do to government printing presses what Amazon.com and other internet retailers have done to big box stores.

Tom Kando said...

a very interesting idea!
I have been fascinated by BitCoin. I totally don’t understand it. The next waves of the future are increasingly incomprehensible to me, but I’m sure it’s going to be interesting...

Nephew Tomi said...

For your amusement Tom. https://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n08/john-lanchester/when-bitcoin-grows-up

Post a Comment

Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!