The Trump disaster is upon us. More specifically, the Trumponomics disaster is upon us. That is, the President and his Republican goons are going to try to pass a massive tax cut to benefit the super rich.
You don’t have to be an
economist to see why this is a disaster. And I am not even talking about the
immorality and the injustice of making
the rich even richer and the poor even poorer. No, what I am talking about is
what this is going to do to the federal budget and the national economy.
In order to continue to provide all the necessary services, the government has to spend more than it collects. To make up the shortfall, it has to borrow money by issuing treasury bonds. It has been doing this for decades, and the accumulated federal debt keeps growing. It now stands at $20 trillion, which is roughly 106% of the GDP.
Table One shows what’s been
happening since the 1960s:
Table
I: Growth of US Federal Deficit: 1960 to 2016
Years
|
Amount borrowed
|
President(s); event(s)
|
Cumulative Debt;
% of GDP
|
1960-62
|
$22 billion =
$7.5 billion per year
|
Kennedy
|
$309 billion
= 51% of GDP
|
1963-68
|
$50 billion =
$8.3 billion per year
|
Johnson; Vietnam escalation
|
$359 billion
= 38% of GDP
|
1969-73
|
$61 billion = $12.2 billion
per year
|
Nixon; Vietnam war
|
$420 billion
= 30% of GDP
|
1974-76
|
$134 billion = $44.4 billion
per year
|
Ford; Vietnam war
|
$554 billion
= 30% of GDP
|
1977-80
|
$228 billion = $57 billion per
year
|
Carter; Inflation
|
$782 billion
= 30% of GDP
|
1981-88
|
$1260 billion = $158 billion
per yr.
|
Reagan; “Starve the beast;”
Tax cuts
|
$2.1 trillion
= 34% of GDP
|
1989-92
|
$994 billion = $249 billion
per yr.
|
Bush I
|
$3.1 trillion
= 50% of GDP
|
1993-2000
|
$2.3 trillion =
$287 billion per year
|
Clinton
|
$5.4 trillion
= 56% of GDP
|
2001-08
|
$4.5 trillion =
half a trillion per yr.
|
Bush II; 9/11; Wars;
Tax cuts
|
$9.9 trillion
= 68% of GDP
|
2009-16
|
$9.5 trillion = $1.24
trillion per yr.
|
Obama; Great Recession
|
$19.4 trillion
= 106% of GDP
|
The last time this country
enjoyed a federal surplus was during
a few of the Clinton years, when the Cold War had ended and we reaped a “peace
dividend.” After that, all hell broke
loose - 9/11, several wars, the great recession, etc. And even though the government was called upon to meet an unprecedented number of new responsibilities,
politicians such as George W. Bush enacted vast tax CUTS. Today, the ruling
party and its know-nothing President
continue to bark up that very same wrong
tree, clamoring for more tax cuts.
Obama, of course, had no choice but to also contribute to the debt. His
Keynesian response to the Great
Recession was what saved us all.
But make no mistake about it: We
ARE going broke. The government is spending a greater proportion of its income
on servicing its growing debt, and it
is therefore increasingly unable to
meets is responsibilities to the American people. This is reminiscent of what
was happening in France in the second half of the 18th century,
which led to the French Revolution. Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette paid dearly for
bankrupting the state.
The list below shows the steady
increase in the government’s interest payments over the past 66 years:
Year Fed. % payments:
1950 $6 billion
1960 $14 billion
1970 $35 billion
1980 $113
billion
1990 $293
billion
2000 $356
billion
2010 $395
billion
2011 $416
billion
2012 $420
billion
2013 $422
billion
2014 $431
billion
2015 $440
billion
2016 $454
billion
Source: federal interest payments
The growing cost of servicing
the debt is as wasteful as burning dollar bills - by the billions! All this
money could be spent on services, on the safety nets that are more and more
needed by our increasingly impoverished population, on science, education,
health care, infrastructure, you name it.
How much of its money does the
government waste in this manner? Just take a look at a recent (2015) federal
budget:
The total size of the budget is
about $4 trillion. Below is a list of
the major budgetary categories:
1. Social Security: 33.3%
2. Medicare and health: 27.4%
3. Military: 15.9%
4.Interest payment: 6 %*
5. V A benefits: 4.2%
6. Food and Agriculture: 3.5%
7. Education.: 2.7%
8. Transportation: 2.2%
9. Housing and Community: 1.6%
10. International affairs: 1.3%
11. Energy and Environment: 1.2%
12. Science: .8%
Sources: US. Federal Budget (Wikipedia).The Federal Budget
* This source understates the
amount spent on debt servicing. Like all
borrowers, the government has benefitted from the extremely low interest rates
of recent years. Sooner or later the rates will rise, and the government’s
interest payments will skyrocket.
Even so, interest payment is
already the fourth largest expense on the list, exceeding all categories except
Social Security, Medicare and military
spending.
Imagine what wonderful things
the government could fund with the hundreds of billions of dollars it wastes on
%? How much scientific research? How many college scholarships? How many roads
and bridges? How much new housing? How much on
renewable energy? How many
improvements to the national parks?
Public transportation? Support for arts
and music? Affordable universal health
care?
The downward spiral of
out-of-control borrowing can only be stopped through a combination of (1) belt
tightening and (2) major tax increase, if only temporarily. Debt financing is
already beginning to crowd out even the
most essential services and safety nets. This the meaning of the cruel
Republican efforts to cut back Medicaid,
to repeal Obamacare, to abolish defined-benefits retirement plans, to cut and
cut whatever basic services and safety nets help the downtrodden, while at the
same further reducing the taxes of the rich.
Quite the opposite is needed: A massive tax increase, hopefully a temporary
one, to eliminate the debt, to break the vicious cycle. This shouldn’t be difficult, especially if done progressively.
After all, there is an obscene concentration of wealth in this country. 40
years ago, the average CEO made about 30 times the salary of his average
employee. Now, that ratio is 300! Can a
CEO not get by on a million and a half a year? Must he make ten times that
much?
7 comments:
right on!
The budget that Trump proposes, is so unbelievably stupid, that it's laughable. He not only discounts the revenue loss from his proposed tax cuts in his calculation, but is adding to the defense budget and border security by taking away from most non-defense government agencies. 31% from the EPA!
It may reduce our federal debt, but at what cost? In your article you don't mention the most obvious way to do this, which is reduce our military budget and cap the 'tax expenditures' that allow the rich to deduct from their taxes.
Belt tightening has not had a positive effect on the economies of many countries (Greece). Raising taxes on the middle class is not the answer either, since we already pay an excessive share. Increasing corporate taxes and taxes on the super-rich as well as reducing our military budget will work.
Nice analytic piece. Thanks for this. As someone once said, "Taxes are the price we pay for civilization," which would suggest this is not a very civilized country.
Thanks for your comments, people.
I agree with Madeleine on everything.
That’s why I start out talking about the disaster of Trumponomics.
But my intent in this short piece was to focus on ONE aspect of the problem - the need for the federal government to somehow raise its income.
It was not my intent, here, to discuss the second part of the equation - the need to cut federal expenses SOMEWHERE. Nor was it my intent to specify where the cuts should occur - although I agree with Madeleine’s priorities.
Getting back to my main point - the need to raise taxes: I also agree with Madeleine as to where and how this should be done. That’s why I call for a progressive tax increase and I remind the readers of this country’s terrible concentration of wealth.
All I am trying to focus on in this article is the need to raise more revenue (as happened for example in California, under governor Brown’s wise stewardship), so as to break the downward spiral of indebtedness.
Tom, I have always felt that it is a conflict of interest and immoral for a government entity that prints money to borrow that money. Neither the Republicans or Democrats have been able to control their borrowing, it is just a matter of who they give the money they take to--the rich, the poor, or cronies.
Individual states, on the other hand, have to balance their budget better because if they don't print money they go bankrupt more normally--like many of the poorly-managed California pension funds.
This leads me to question whether the next wave, that may really mess up the government in Washington, will be the adoption of currencies like BitCoin that governments can't control or manipulate. Electronic currencies may do to government printing presses what Amazon.com and other internet retailers have done to big box stores.
a very interesting idea!
I have been fascinated by BitCoin. I totally don’t understand it. The next waves of the future are increasingly incomprehensible to me, but I’m sure it’s going to be interesting...
For your amusement Tom. https://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n08/john-lanchester/when-bitcoin-grows-up
Post a Comment
Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!