Thursday, August 10, 2017

North Korea



We just returned from a three-week Hawaiian vacation and I am happy to resume blogging.

When starting up again, the first question is, what shall I write about? The choice is always between something fun, like a travel story, or something grisly, like Trump or North Korea.

Unfortunately, I have to select the latter, since our blog is primarily about current affairs. So right now, I am going to talk about the most important issue in the world today. Next time I’ll tell you about some of our funny experiences on our recent trips. The most important thing in the world today is the face-off between two lunatics - Donald Trump and Kim Jong-Un.

Now don’t misunderstand me: I am not engaging in moral equivalency between the US and North Korea, or between the two countries’ regimes. The US, despite its unhinged President, remains a functioning democracy. North Korea is an indescribably totalitarian, militarized insane asylum.

However, the verbal exchanges between the two leaders are frightening. Trump’s ‘fire and fury” speech, far from making me feel more comfortable in the belief that our leader is strong, resolute and ready to fight back, appears to INCREASE the chance of a catastrophic nuclear conflagration. No one wants or anticipates such a conflagration, but miscalculations and stupidity have been known to lead to disaster before.

The best example of unexpected suicidal behavior on a global scale was World War One: When the Germans, the French, the British, the Austro-Hungarians and the Russians happily marched off to the front in the summer of 1914, they all believed that the conflict would be brief and mild. In the end, the war engulfed the entire planet. The catastrophe was essentially the result of idiocy and miscalculation (See for example Barbara Tuchman’s The Guns of August).

Those of us beyond a certain age remember the fifties vividly, as well as the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. I still lived in Europe at the time, but we were every bit as aware of the threat of nuclear annihilation as Americans were. My wife Anita is an air force brat. Her father flew B52s for SAC at Offutt AFB near Omaha. She remembers the absurd drills during the Cuban Missile Crisis, when she and her classmates were told to practice ducking underneath their desks when the nukes start raining down on them.

Hawaii is the first state to take the current threat seriously. Authorities there have begun to test the attack warning system, and they have broadcast instructions advising the population how and what type of shelter to seek in case of attack. After a North Korean nuclear launch, Hawaii would have fifteen minutes to protect itself. North Korea’s nuclear bombs yield roughly the same power as those that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Thus, a majority of the Hawaiians would survive, even though hundreds of thousands would die.

And imagining escalation of the nuclear exchange to the mainland of the US, Japan, South Korea and other parts of the world is too horrific to even contemplate.

So here you have it, folks. I join the vast majority of public opinion in saying that the likelihood of a nuclear exchange remains small. However, the fact that something has never happened in the past does not provide certainty that it will not happen in the future.

The world survived the Cold War. Most world leaders have always understood that the point of having nuclear bombs is precisely to make sure that they never get used. I hope that both Kim Jong-Un and Donald Trump remember this.

Coincidentally, America is led by the least qualified man ever to occupy the White House, precisely at a moment of the gravest danger. I now find myself praying, even though I am an atheist.

© Tom Kando 2017;All Rights Reserved
  leave comment here

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Now is the perfect time for Israel and the US to do a preemptive nuclear attack on Iran. It's the last thing the Iranians are expecting, and it will scare the bejuzus out of North Korea.

Tom Kando said...

?!?!?

Pieter said...

I am very much in the anti Trump circle but that said he might just be on the right track. We have (as has the world) condemned North Korea over and over. Yet they continue to increase their missile capabilities and developing nuclear armaments. They have over many years said they hate us and want to distroy us. At what point do we say enough is enough. I keep thinking of prime minister Chamberlain.

Barry Schoenborn said...

Well said! Very compact, and with (in my opinion), the correct assessment!

Tom Kando said...

I thank Barry and Pieter for their comments.

Regarding Pieter’s statement: Sure, appeasement, the Munich analogy and all that is applicable. However, the sixty-four-thousand-dollar question is: What do you DO?

The military option, if it ever existed, is no longer available, since any military action on our part will result in hundreds of thousands if not millions of deaths, at least in South Korea, and also probably elsewhere, including possibly on the US mainland, if Kim Jong-Un is crazy enough to launch his nukes.

As John McCain said, a threat is only meaningful if you are actually able to carry it out.

It is too late now to denuclearize North Korea, either through force or through diplomacy. The only thing to hope and work for is to ensure that that country doesn’t USE its weapons - same as Pakistan, India, China, Russia, Israel, France and the UK - all the other countries that possess nuclear weapons. That’s reality.

Economic sanctions and diplomacy seem to be the main cards available, unpromising as they may appear to be at this time.

It is also useful to continue to improve defensive anti-ballistic missile systems, even though these are also imperfect...

There may also be the possibility of cyber sabotage, but I don't know anything about this...

Anonymous said...

Glad you're back Tom.

We know what you don't like and what your fears are...now let's hear your sentiments on solutions to this astonishing circumstance. And indecently have you noticed that the missiles are on mobile launchers with NO supportive technology in view. And we have our ICBMs in holes dug fifty years ago ! That deterrence force has had NO noticeable influence on Kim Jong Un. The future dangers associated with not confronting this guy now are utterly unacceptable. So Mr. President what do we do ?

David said...

Hooray for the praying atheist!

Tom Kando said...

To anonymous, above:

I get the sarcasm. I have no more solutions to offer than you do, or anyone else I have heard from so far, nor do I claim to have the answer.

Regarding our nuclear deterrence: It has always been based on the “triad,” and I assume that it still is. That is, we have the land-based silos, we have strategic bombers and we have submarines. So we should still be amply capable of pulverizing North Korea.

That said, I did sum up - in my reply to Pieter, above - how I feel about responding to Kim Jong-Un. As I said, a preventive nuclear war with North Korea is not the least desirable option, it is NOT an option.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the reply...yep Triad is there. My reference to the silo based system was only to point out the rather striking advancement (presumed of course) that NK
has developed in moving the missiles about the land and having a targeting capacity from a variety of predetermined launch sites. And if the video record is not fake lunching four rockets in a row and in sequence. Rather impressive.

Of course one solution is to terminate Kim Jong Un. How about setting up a drone base on an aircraft carrier and then whack the guy as he watches an army parade pass by or alternatively set up a situation where he is kissed to death by a lovely NK woman (on the other hand I guess this one won't work as he knows about the technique).

No need to reply. I enjoy reading your blog and maybe half the time agree with you.

Sharon Darrow said...

So on target. Sick at heart at what is happening to our country, and the danger we are now in.

Don said...

Tom, this was very very good. We need to pray and keep a good thought every day.

Pieter said...

This is an excellent article for this topic. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/08/10/trump-north-korea-nuclear-crisis-nicholas-burns-column/554208001/

Aycke Smook said...

People don't know their history that's why you make the same faults as their predecessors and that will never change.

Post a Comment

Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!