Sunday, December 3, 2017

The Tax Bill

by


I am not an expert on taxes, other than knowing that taxes, if structured right, come back to benefit the tax payer. Taxes pay for everything that is essential in a well-run society: roads, bridges, police, firefighters, schools and so on. If you lower taxes too much, you jeopardize these services and a society becomes dysfunctional. A few bananas at the top that have and control everything, and everybody else be damned.

We do not pay a lot of taxes compared to most OECD countries. Taxes accounts for about 26 percent of the United States’ GDP, placing the U.S. 31st out of 35 countries studied (See: General Government Revenue). In countries with the highest percentages, (Denmark, France, Belgium, Finland, Austria, Italy and Sweden), taxation accounts for more than 42 percent of GDP. The countries continue to improve their quality of life, because they pay more taxes. Their roads are better, their health care is better and cheaper, their educational system is better and cheaper. Among OECD countries, only Korea, Chile, Mexico, and Ireland collect less taxes than the United States as a percentage of GDP.

Here, we already have an anemic social safety net that leaves too many Americans without the basic needs to live a decent life. Our health care system is one of the worst of the OECD countries. Our infrastructure is appalling, our schools are underfunded and higher education is so expensive that many young people cannot afford it.

The Republican tax bill reduces the corporate tax rate from a 35% top bracket to only 20%, which they claim, puts the US more in line with other countries. What you seldom hear is that most other developed countries also have value-added tax (VAT), a kind of consumption tax. The US doesn’t.

Half of US federal revenue comes from individual income taxes and payroll taxes make up 34% (which is mostly paid by employees). In 1952, a third of all revenue in this country came from large corporations. Today it is only 9%, and although corporations only make up 10% of the economy, they rake in huge profits.

What will lowering the corporate tax rate do to improve our economy? Will they pay their employees more or will the higher profits land in executives’ pocket? The Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank asked executives, “If passed in its current form, what would be the likely impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on your capital investment and hiring plans?” Only 8% of the executives said the bill would make them increase hiring plans “significantly.” (See: Here's why a corporate tax cut will never boost economic growth.)

This tax bill is simply going to ruin our economy by putting even more of the money into the pockets of the top 1%. How can an economy run when only 1% of the population can afford to buy things?

Soon, the truth about the ‘pie in the sky, trickle down economics’ scenario that this whole bill is built on, will become apparent. Then the Republicans will try to fill the trillion dollar deficit hole by cutting more and more of the already slim entitlement programs that so many Americans rely on: Health care, Social Security, Public Education and Infrastructure.

It is a sickeningly immoral, ill-devised bill that will accelerate this country’s decline and we will finally qualify to be called a Banana Republic. Courtesy of the Republican Party. leave comment here

7 comments:

Louellyn said...

Excellent commentary on current Republican tax travesty. I have found it particularly ironic and laughable that a prime justification for the gift of billions to U.S. corporations and equity firms is that it is the only way possible for tU.S corporations to compete effectively with the low corporate taxes in the northern European tier. How is it that now-- we have to compete with them with lower taxes--when for decades we have been told that Europe's socialized economies were about to collapse under the weight of their tax structure. We have been told that their high taxes have sapped creativity, stifled growth and distorted markets. And yet --as Madeleine points out, all agree that nowhere in the history of organized human life has there been more success in providing whole national populations a higher standard of living and quality of life than in these self-same higher tax social democracies.

Anonymous said...

This is a fundamentally flawed view of what taxes do. A sovereign, fiat currency issuer is not fiscally constrained by tax collections. It cannot be. Taxes don't provision the federal government. Where would people get dollars with which they pay taxes if the monopoly issuer of dollars--government--didn't spend them out into the economy first? (Think about that, even for a little while)

See this blog post for an antidote.

As long as "progressives" have this level of cluelessness about money, we'll have what we've been getting--austerity. So, for one example, Federal spending on higher education is down 55% since 1972. Gosh, I wonder why tuition keeps rising!

But that's what you get if you adopt the "Eeek! We're out of money!" nonsense.

Either money will serve us, or we'll serve money. See also this.

Mark Dempsey said...

Sorry folks, as much as I am not a fan of the Trump tax bill, this blog is replete with errors. The biggest one is that it clearly believes that government is provisioned by tax revenue. Really? We have a sovereign, fiat currency, and can make as much as we need any time we need it. No one says "Hey! We're out of money!" when it comes to war in Iraq, or financial sector bailouts.
...and where would people get dollars with which they pay taxes if government didn't spend them out into the economy first? It's spend, then tax, not tax & spend.
Anyway, at the risk of immodesty, I would urge you to forward blog posts like this one instead.
--Regards,
--Mark Dempsey

Don said...

Hey Madeline has done an excellent job of explaining something that is complicated to most people. And the more people who understand this BS the better we will be able to find it.

Anonymous said...

Looks like the link to the recommended blog post didn't survive (WTF!). Does the blog erase tags?

Here's the link: https://www.laprogressive.com/make-america-solvent-again/

madeleine kando said...

Yes, the government can print as much money as it wants, which would result in inflation. Sorry, folks, but the majority of government revenue DOES come from taxes.

madeleine kando said...

There is a precedent to this Trump tax bill. We are in for a lot of trouble. Republicans Are Getting Ready to Repeat Kansas’ Tax Cut Disaster

Post a Comment

Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!