Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Violence; John Wick 3



 My wife and I just saw the movie John Wick 3 - Parabellum. Or actually, we just saw about half of it. Then we walked out.

It takes a lot to make me walk out of a movie. I’m a miser. I don’t like wasting my money. I generally consume everything I pay for.

I find this new movie’s enormous popularity and the rave reviews it gets from both the public and the critics a scandal. During its first week, the film ranked Number One at the box office.

The audience rating at IMDb is 8.2 out of 10 - the same as classics such as Metropolis, The Third Man, and Indiana Jones. Absurd! The audience of Rotten Tomatoes gives it a 93% approval rating, and the critics at Rotten Tomatoes nearly as much - 89%. The general public’s taste can be expected to be flawed, but the critics? What’s the matter with these folks?

Of the 216 reviews published by Rotten Tomatoes, only 24 are negative. The remaining 192 are superlative. Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times writes that this film is “superb wall-to-wall action entertainment, filled with dark humor...” he gives it three-and-a-half stars out of a maximum four. I usually like Roeper’s reviews. I really enjoyed his show with Roger Ebert, and I miss it. But this? Shame

I’m afraid that of the 24 bad reviews, nearly half (10) are from Europe, Canada and Australia, suggesting that there may be a little bit less bad taste overseas than in the US.

What makes this movie so disgusting is its coarseness, the meaningless violence, each scene depicting more grotesque forms of dying and killing - knives slowly penetrating eyes and brains, axes splitting skulls of living men, etc.

Meanwhile, the audience found many of the most repulsive savagery funny. As Pamela Howell, one of the few negative critics, wrote, “...the audience seemed to find many of the most repulsive savagery laugh out loud funny” (Reel Honest Reviews).

Some will argue that there are redeeming qualities. The fights evoke the “beauty of martial arts.” I know something about the martial arts. I did Taekwondo for about two years. I learned that the object is to disarm, disable or neutralize your opponent, not vivisect him.

Then too, maybe this film looked different to those who had seen the first two episodes, to which this is a second sequel. Who knows.
Great special effects, some say. Really? Vivid representations of hatchets splitting skulls and brains bursting from exploding bullets?
There was hardly a plot. And of course, the bad guys are the Russians. How predictable.

To her credit, Katie Walsh, Tribune News Service (Sacramento Bee, May 17, 2019) describes this movie as an “Interminable slog of violence,” a “ballet of bloodshed,” a “monsoon of murder.”
To which Pamela Powell adds: “...I cannot recall a more disturbingly grotesque display of violence....The entire film is comprised of...savage bloodshed.. (that is).ultimately like watching someone play a violent video game...”

In the end, this movie simply becomes BORING, as are most video games.

* * * * * * *

The larger question is: What is popular culture coming to?

I have written and done a good deal of research on popular culture (See my textbook, Leisure and Popular Culture in Transition) 

Also, in my classes, I dealt with the subject of video games: I went over a list of hypothesized causes of our high rate of violent crime. It included violent popular culture/video games. I asked the familiar question, “do violent movies such as Pulp Fiction, music which advocates violence, and violent video games contribute to delinquency and criminal violence?” For example, it was said that some of the perpetrators of the Columbine High School massacre had been avid violent video games fans. I concluded that the evidence was not clear.

I am also reminded of television shows such as Deadwood. A while back I wrote a spoof on this HBO series, deriding the frequency of the word “fuck” in it: It occurs 1.56 times per minute, for a grand total of about 3,000.

Don’t misunderstand me: I’m no prude. I just mention this show as an example of not only unnecessary but actually counterproductive vulgarization: Those who argue that the language used in Deadwood makes the show more authentic, more the way real life was on the frontier, are wrong. No group of people ever spoke that way. And the frequency of cussing is so laughable as to prevent the viewer from focusing on the show...

I’m not concluding with some gem of wisdom regarding the evolution of American popular culture. Anything I may say could be dismissed as the expected rant of an old man who, as all old people, is unable to keep up with the times, with cultural change...Maybe.

And maybe not. I still enjoy contemporary popular culture - Hollywood, HBO, some contemporary music. But there is so much crap coming out of Hollywood. And the amount of graphic violence and vulgarity has grown factorially over the past generations. About this there can be no doubt.

© Tom Kando 2019;All Rights Reserved

leave comment here

12 comments:

Ramu Kadiyam said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Your cinephile kid has to pipe up. Having seen some of this film, it actually pales in comparison to (or at the least is in keeping with) films that predate it, sometimes by several decades. Passolini's 1975 film "Salo" has passages that are not simply grotesque, but are intensely graphic and horrifying. And the early 1970s films of American auteur Jon Waters feature comedic scenes based on unspeakable and gag-inducing acts. Somewhat more recently, the 2003 Korean sensation "Oldboy" has scenes that will upset me to my dying day. Incidentally, "Oldboy" is part of a trilogy that has inspired the John Wick trilogy. My point is that while John Wick is a mainstream sensation, that is it's only real claim to fame - it's nothing new, but it sure is something that's not on my must-see list.

William said...

Whether or not there have been films as violently vulgar as Wick in the past, I think Tom’s point is that such films have increasingly become the staple of Hollywood in its pursuit of profit, and his concern is for what effect the new normal is having on popular culture in general and on human beings in particular, It’s also the case that the coarsening of our popular culture is occurring at the same time our political culture sinks into its own swamp.

Butler said...

I have to agree with you. Today's Movies are bloody and vulgar and often have no plots.

Leah said...

Totally agree; prime-time TV is a disgusting buffet of gore, anymore. What’s wrong with people who find this stuff entertaining? Frightening, that this is what anyone wants to watch. I sure don’t.

Dave said...

I'm on board with you, Tom. I haven't seen 3, and it is terribly unlikely that I ever will, but I've seen at least parts of the other 2 on tv. Frankly, I don't get why people think it's wonderful. Beyond that, I don't understand why it was even made. Who would make it & why?

Chuck said...

Saw this last week and I agree with your call 100%.
My only regret is that I, too, did not walk out (I stayed to see that his dog was okay)!!!

Margo said...

I agree 100%.

Tom Kando said...

Good response, folks, thanks.

“Anonymous” confesses to being my daughter. What erudition! I suppose many foreign cultures produce highly violent movies also. As far as Asia is concerned, I am aware of such a tradition, what with martial arts, samurai etc.

I like Bill’s drawing of a relationship between violent/vulgar popular culture and our country’s political trend...

My other daughter’s taste and position regarding this issue are equally well stated and in agreement with mine.

So most of us, here at least, agree, including Dave, Chuck and Margo. Oh, that’s right, there was the dog. How nice, love for your pet, while killing 157 people...

csaba said...

Merci , Tom pour l’avertissement. You just saved us 36 euros. So,you're invited to dinner next time you're in Paris...:) :)

Anonymous said...

Our "violent/vulgar popular culture" is controlled by Hollywood lefties!

Geoff said...

Hi. This is Geoffrey Harris, son of Dr. Stephen Harris, who was twice chair of the humanities department here at CSU Sacramento. I saw only the first John Wick and only the last Purge. The first John Wick had the killing of the dog serve as a pretext for the violence, murder and mayhem. I did not see The Hateful 8 as that was a snuff film. JW is a take-off on the Matrix with the violence scaled up but the mystery and meaning removed. These are gladitorial festivals. The critics are fine with this violence as Americans in general are fine with violence but not x, or cursing or nudity. Critics are concerned about pushing the pc narrative of focusing on the promotion of gayness, feminism, race mixing, and the emasculation of men especially of heroes, and opposing slavery.

Post a Comment

Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!