This is a game: I take 3 variables, I cross-tab them, and I formulate some hypotheses about their correlation (or lack thereof).
The variables are:
1.
Conservatism vs. Liberalism
2.
Kindness or not
3.
Being well-informed or not
In other words, an individual
can be conservative or liberal; he/she can be a by and large nice person or what we could call an a...hole;
and she/he can be well-educated and intelligently informed or not.
For the sake of simplicity, the
three variables are dichotomous. Also, let’s not quibble about the true meaning
and nature of being ”nice” as opposed to being an “a...hole” This is just an experiment, maybe a fun one, and most of us know an a...hole
when we meet one... Also, for the purposes of this
experiment, I use a total sample of 200.
Liberal or conservative?
|
frequencies
|
|||
ignorant or well-informed
|
liberal
|
conservative
|
null hyp.
|
hypotheses
|
ignorant
|
Mean
|
25
|
25
|
|
well-informed
|
Mean
|
25
|
15
|
|
ignorant
|
mean
|
25
|
45
|
|
well-informed
|
mean
|
25
|
15
|
|
ignorant
|
nice
|
25
|
25
|
|
well-informed
|
nice
|
25
|
15
|
|
ignorant
|
nice
|
25
|
45
|
|
well-informed
|
nice
|
25
|
15
|
|
total
|
100
|
100
|
200
|
200
|
My assumptions:
Half the people are not nice, half
are nice:100
vs. 100
There are more ignorant people
than well-informed people: 140 vs. 60
There are more conservatives than liberals (in America):120 vs 80
The frequencies in the
4th column of table #1 (25 in each cell) represent the null
hypothesis, i.e. a zero correlation between these three variables.
Predictions/Hypotheses:
Column #5 shows my hypothetical
set of frequencies:
1. Ignorant mean liberals:
2. Well-informed mean liberals:15
3. Ignorant mean conservatives:
4. Well-informed mean
conservatives: 15
Total mean people: half the population: 100
5. Ignorant nice liberals:
6. Well-informed nice liberals: 15
7. Ignorant nice conservatives:
8. Well-informed nice
conservatives15
Total nice people: half the
population:
Or, ranked:
1. 45 ignorant mean conservatives: E.g. Donald Trump(22.5% of total
population)
2. 45 ignorant nice conservatives: E.g. Some of my neighbors (22.5% )
3. 25 ignorant mean liberals: E.g. Some of my former students (12.5% “ )
4. 25 ignorant nice liberals: E.g. some of my former students (12.5% “ )
5. 15 well-informed mean liberals:
E.g. Some of my former colleagues (7.5% " )
6. 15 well-informed mean conservatives: E.g. Rush Limbaugh (7.5% " )
7. 15 well-informed nice liberals:
E.g. Most of my former colleagues (7.5% " )
8. 15 well-informed nice conservatives. E.g.: A few of my former
colleagues - some religious people(7.5%)
Analysis:
As
I said, I’m starting with the assumption that half the people are not so very
nice, and half are pretty nice.
Also,
a majority of the population is still
not college educated. Do I equate
erudition and a college education with being well-informed? Again, let’s not nitpick. What I am taking
into consideration here is that there are more people with a relatively low
level of education and information than the obverse. Hence I give these two categories
70% and 30% respectively, rather than 50-50.
On
this basis, the two largest groups are (1) ignorant mean conservatives and (2)
ignorant nice conservatives. Together, they make up 45% of the total
population. This is in part because there are more conservatives than liberals
among the population. And it is partly due to the fact that conservatives are
often ignorant of facts. The best examples of such people are our current
President and his fervid supporters.
At the same time, there are many very nice conservatives. Note that I predict equal proportions of mean and nice people among liberals and conservatives (half, in each case): My experience has been (both in the US and overseas) that the proportions of mean-spirited and kind people are the same among progressives and conservatives. Nowhere have I experienced a hospitality as fabulous as in the Deep South. Many religious, white, conservatives are very kind and generous. I have many nice Republican friends among my neighbors and among the members of my health club.
Next
largest are the two contingents of ignorant liberals. These contingents are
relatively large because there are so
many ignorant people. Note that the proportion of well-informed liberals is
37.5%, whereas that of well-informed conservatives is only 25%. In other words,
while a majority of the total population is mis-informed (due to lack of
education), there is a larger proportion of well-informed liberals than
well-informed conservatives.
I
spent fifty years of my life at the university - as a student and as a
professor. It is convenient for me to get some of my examples from that environment. Academe is a liberal subculture of course.
Most of my students and colleagues were
liberal. Some of my liberal students were nice, and some were mean. During the
turbulent sixties and their aftermath, some
students were exceptionally hostile, sometimes verging on physical
violence. Some students combined their mean disposition with great ignorance,
and some were well informed.
Among the faculty, the proportions were somewhat different: a vast majority of my colleagues were liberal, and only some among them were mean-spirited (for example, attempting to deny tenure to a faculty member with whose political views they disagreed). Most of the liberal professors were true gentlemen.
Two
of the smallest groups (in proportion)
are well-informed mean and
well-informed nice conservatives:
Together, they make up merely 15 % of the total population, even though
conservatives make up 60% of the population. This is because conservatives are so often ill-informed. leave comment here
© Tom Kando 2020;All Rights Reserved.
5 comments:
Crime statistics show that younger people, Blacks, and Hispanics are more violent (“mean”) and bullying than older (“nice”) white people; election records show that younger people, Blacks, and Hispanic are more “liberal” than older “conservative” whites; high school and college graduation records show that Blacks and Hispanic have lower educations (“ignorant”) compared to (“well-informed”) whites; therefore Q.E.D, “conservatives” are “nice” and more “well-informed” than “liberals”.
An interesting corollary: “conservatives” are more “attractive” than “liberals”.
Consider first, the case of women. We postulate that men judge women mainly by their physical looks. Statistically it can be shown that lesbians, Blacks, unwed mothers, trans females, men haters (many divorced women), hippies, feminazis, older single women, etc, are primarily “liberals” whereas married white women are primarily “conservative”.
Looking at the various “liberal” types, we know that
1) black women are generally considered less attractive than white women as shown by the preference of both black and white men for white women
2) unwed mothers, trans females, men haters, hippies, feminazis, and older single women either are not interested in appearing attractive to men or do not have the resources to appear attractive (not enough resources to buy the fashions, go Dutch treat, join the clubs and spas to get in shape, etc).
3) Recognizing that many lesbians are bisexual and may try to attract men, the butch half will still not be attracted.
In contrast, “conservative” white married women have mostly already proven their ability to attract and keep their husband by staying sexy and in shape. As such, “conservative” women are more “attractive” to both liberal and conservative men than “liberal” women
Now consider the case of men. Contrary to the unidimensional male judgment of females, females judge male attractiveness multidimensionally on masculinity, intelligence, power, position, achievement, confidence, wealth, sense of humor, height, reasonable looks, etc. Given that most veterans, police, firemen, first responders, etc are very masculine and “conservative”, and given that most entrepreneurs and businessmen are very confident, intelligent and wealthy and “conservative”, and given that most “liberal” men are not the above and just blend in or are dominated by their wives, is it any wonder that “conservative” men are considered more attractive than “liberals” by attractive females.
Q.E.D. “conservatives” are more “attractive” than “liberals“
Jeez Tom. Look what you've done!
Tomi, you mean that I enabled those two asinine anonymous comments?
I suppose you are right. But hey, the universal mantra is that “dialogue is good,” that we should keep communication channels open to our adversaries, etc... So that justifies this post...
You are right of course. I just wish I had the energy to go on. Theres a lot more work to be done here.
X
Post a Comment
Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!