Sunday, May 17, 2020

Science Fiction Becomes Rality




It finally happened. Armageddon has arrived. For over a century, we have been treated to various forms of science fiction. A large portion of this genre’s books and movies has always been apocalyptic - presenting one scenario or another about the end of the world, or at least the end of humanity.

I grew up devouring the works of Isaac Asimov, Ray Bradbury, Arthur C. Clarke, Philip Dick, Robert Heinlein, H.G. Wells and many others.

Wells’ The War of the Worlds came out as a radio adaptation in 1938 and as a classic film in 1953. Other classics that mesmerized me as a child include The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951) and The Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956).

Television added a flood of Science Fiction, including Star Trek (the original series, 1965-1969, still my favorite, followed by multiple subsequent “generations”).

Meanwhile, by the end of the 20th century, Hollywood was inundating the market with mega productions of questionable quality - such films as Independence Day (1996), Mars Attacks (1996), Armageddon (1998), Deep Impact (1998) and many others.

Even I tried my hand at the genre: (See my Humanity’s Future: The Next 25,000 Years). At least, my book is not apocalyptic. It goes more along the optimistic prognoses found in many episodes of Star Trek - predicting humanity’s progress rather than downfall.


But as I said, a great deal of Science Fiction is apocalyptic. I won’t speculate as to why, except to state a familiar but true cliché: The prevailing mood in western civilization, compared to when I grew up in the 1950s, has changed from optimism to pessimism. Belief in “Progress” is no longer widespread. Nothing exemplifies this more than the environmental movement, which tells us that the planet is headed for destruction, as we go through the “Anthropocene.”

And now, lo and behold, the Apocalypse is upon us. It’s real. The Covid-19 pandemic surpasses anything Hollywood could think of. Script writers couldn’t make this stuff up.
An enemy is threatening the ENTIRE PLANET. It is not an asteroid, as in Armageddon and in Deep Impact, but just the same, it is GLOBAL, as were War of the Worlds and all the other apocalyptic productions.

Remember how Close Encounters of the Third Kind (one of the rare versions in which the aliens are friendly) tries to display a global perspective, with scenes in India, Mexico, Wyoming and elsewhere? The corona virus beats that, attacking in about 200 countries so far.
In Outbreak, Dustin Hoffman tries to save us by fighting an epidemic that is spreading from Africa to a small town in Northern California. That’s small potatoes compared to Covid-19.

It is said that life imitates art. How true. We even have a real-life Darth Vader. His name is Donald Trump.

In most end-of-the-world science fiction, the global response to the threat is lead by the president of the United States - Morgan Freeman in Deep Impact, Jack Nicholson in Mars Attacks, Bill Pullman in Independence Day, etc. This is because Hollywood is American and because America has been the most powerful country lately. So the White House becomes the nerve center for the resistance, and its occupant becomes, for all practical purposes, the president of the world.

This time, America is not leading the charge. However, something else is starting to happen: by early May, the corona virus has penetrated the White House. The consequences of this are not yet clear.

As Yogi Berra said: It's hard to predict, especially the future. So I won’t try. But as Dr. Michael Osterholm of the University of Minnesota recently said, we are only in the second inning of this pandemic.

Will the White House  become incapacitated by widespread contamination? Will this spread to the presidential staff, the secret service, the cabinet and others?
Will alternative leadership be needed? What role will Congress, the military and other branches of the government play?
Will there be civil unrest and chaos?
Will there be a rise of regional blocks, such as the West Coast, the Atlantic Seashore, the South, etc.? Will there be fragmentation in other parts of the world, for example in the European Union?
Once the pandemic becomes widespread in the tropics, will there be massive migration from Africa to Europe and from Latin America to North America?
Will China continue to look inward and continue to protect itself more effectively than most of the rest of the world, thus becoming the new hegemon?
Will there be armed conflict between countries? Aggressive regimes such as Russia may engage in a certain amount of military activity against their neighbors, but by and large, most countries will be too weakened and preoccupied by the raging pandemic to be able to mount effective coalitions and wage large-scale, organized wars.
Will the world regress to the sort of dark ages described by Walter Miller in A Canticle for Leibowitz (1959) or the dystopias depicted in post-apocalyptic films such as The Omega Man (1971) and The Book of Eli (2010),?

© Tom Kando 2020;All Rights Reserved

leave comment here

10 comments:

David Covin said...

Thoughtful, well-said. And you not only read books, you see a lot of movies, too.
Well-rounded.

If this is the end of the world - at least for homo sapiens - we probably got a longer run that we deserve, the biggest surprise is that our demise didn't come from our own hands. I guess it's a surprise because we always see ourselves as the key players. Not.

Dave

Tom Kando said...

Thanks, Dave.
You make a good point, that this time the enemy is not human. For once, we can't tackle the problem via tribalism (although Trump is already trying - blaming China etc.).

Just to be clear: I am not suggesting that this is the end of the world/humanity. I'm only drawing attention to parallels between this crisis and the many apocalyptic scenarios in popular culture.

Gordon said...

Whether the enemy is quashed and we live happily ever-after (the American Monomyth) or whether we end with despair and misfortune (the Greek Tragedy) partly depends on cultural consciousness. As American society ages I think themes in the movies are less idealistic--we have seen that things happen to people after we saw them ride out into the sunset. Both unrealistic optimism and pessimism tend to be fatalistic views in which "the world happens to me." One thing we are learning from the virus is that there is a lot of personal responsibility involved and while government leaders can give advice, their power to save us is limited. Expecting a government to save us is an illusion.

Gail said...

Thanks Dr. Kando!
This is a provocative piece. I feel like I’m on Gilligans island. My way of living changed two months ago as did everyone else. Thanks for helping us to make sense out of this and hopefully a vaccine will be on the way within the next year.
I’ll read this interesting blog you wrote again and again. I’m also reading a book called “The Coming Plague“ by author Garrett. I guess these types of plagues happen every 100 years or so ...it’s just always a shock when it happens on our watch. What if there is no vaccine? I can’t imagine how our world will cope. Adaptation will be a necessity if we are to survive to this new way of life.
Blessings to you and family-
Gail:-)

Dan said...

RIGHT ON
I NEEDED THIS

YES INDEEDDDDDDDDDDDDD
THANK YOU

Dave M. said...

Tom,
Enjoyed another column! Love Trump as Darth, although he has none of the gravitas.

As to the “future” quote and its attribution to Yogi Berra, it appears it may be an old Danish saying that is often ascribed to the famous “inventor of the atom” Niels Bohr...

In 1976 the mathematician Stanislaw M. Ulam writing in his book “Adventures of a Mathematician” credited the adage to Niels Bohr Footnote).
As Niels Bohr said in one of his amusing remarks: “It is very hard to predict, especially the future.” But I think mathematics will greatly change its aspect. Something drastic may evolve, an entirely different point of view...

Anonymous said...

I read your corona blog post this morning.... and I just wanted to check in with a little reassurance. This is not Armageddon. It’s not even close. While we are deep in uncertainty about the eventual duration, scope, and implications of the pandemic, there is no reason to think that it will be worse than the 1918 influenza. You are well informed enough to realize I’m not doing the “it’s just a flu” argument. The 1918 pandemic was the most devastating infectious disease event in hundreds of years. My point is, despite how bad that was, it truly was not the end of the world and in fact, before long people had put it out of their minds and it was rarely spoken of again. (Which is a strange phenomenon some scholars have written about, trying to explain.)

If I were a betting person, I’d put my money on COVID-19 deaths in the US to eventually reach a million, possibly more if we get there too quickly. Hopefully we’ll spread them out over a year at least. I am pessimistic about a vaccine (reasons to be discussed in my blog) but more optimistic about survival rates improving with optimization of treatment regimens. Is a million people a terrible tragedy? Of course. Does it change the world forever? Not really, especially if most of those million people are seniors. That’s not meant as an assessment of their value. It’s a statement of their impact on our economic life, and on family life. Grandma passing away has less impact on the kids than if mom dies.

There’s no minimizing the personal impact of a tragic, untimely death for the loved ones. But for society as a whole, the impact of the COVID pandemic may yet be as fleeting as the 1918 flu.

I actually see this pandemic as a dry run for a much worse one. SARS-CoV-2 has the infectivity, but not the lethality. What if the original SARS had spread as easily? Then we would be in bigger trouble—mortality was more like 15-20% overall.

Hey, that was cheery! Seriously, this will pass. But please continue to take precautions for yourself and Anita.

Tom Kando said...

A good number of responses. I appreciate it, particularly supportive messages such as Dan’s.

As always, Gordon makes valid points. It is true that the government’s power to save us is limited. Even so, there are different degrees of governmental ineptitude...

Gail, too, is correct: our ability to adapt will be the key to our survival,in the future.

Dave Marquis, I stand corrected. I have often read about Niels Bohr, whom I greatly admire even though I am of course utterly unable to understand quantum theory.

As to anonymous: She is a good friend and a brilliant scientist - a PhD, an MD and a widely published epidemiologist. I place exceptional value in anything she writes about this subject matter, but I’ll keep her name out of this somewhat private communication.

Above all, let me repeat that I was not suggesting that the Covid-19 pandemic is the end of the world. The Case Fatality Ratio varies between 1% and 6%. I just note that the current situation - fear, panic, strife, hundreds of thousands of deaths, millions of infections, desperate efforts to solve the problem, and especially the UNIVERSAL nature of this attack - is reminiscent of many science fiction fantasies of the recent past... Even so, anonymous’ words are sobering...

Anonymous said...

More food for thought: COVID-19 May Be Much More Contagious Than We Thought: https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2020/05/r-nought?fbclid=IwAR1WxGvSRIKO4E51ULWSf0dSJGjyZBUHgRXmhiy0mVdM76X8zEMzlQ17zgA

Anonymous said...

More food for thought: You Can Still Go Outside While Quarantining. https://www.businessinsider.com/you-can-still-go-outside-while-quarantining-sheltering-in-place-2020-4

Post a Comment

Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!