by Tom Kando
First came Donald Trump. Then the Covid-19 pandemic, followed by economic collapse. Then George Floyd’s unspeakable murder, followed by mass demonstrations and civil unrest across the entire country (and even internationally).
The list of crises afflicting this country never stops. Are we cursed?
I have always felt that I am able to put major events in some sort of perspective, able to give them some meaning. But right now, I am unable to do this. My mind is buzzing with questions, but I have zero answers, zero predictions. The only thing which I do see is that America is facing mounting challenges.
Until George Floyd’s murder on May 25, this country was “only” facing the triple threat of the pandemic, economic collapse, and “Rightism.” This triad is discussed brilliantly by Abram de Swaan in the Dutch weekly De Groene (May 6, 2020). The author assesses the three major crises faced by the Western democracies at this time: The pandemic, the ensuing economic collapse, and the emergence of right-wing, authoritarian, populism in many countries.
(See Abram de Swaan)
Then, a new crisis took over. The massive nationwide protest against police brutality and institutional racism - the “Black Lives Matter” movement - literally replaced the Covid-19 crisis. Since May 25, you can channel surf the news and look for the latest on the pandemic in vain, as MSNBC, CNN and the other media focus almost exclusively on the mass demonstrations. It is as if the pandemic were over. Very strange.
The mass protests are understandable and utterly justified. At the same time, I must raise some questions: For one thing, the phenomenon cannot be dissociated from the Covid-19 crisis. The cumulative effect of the pandemic, obligatory social distancing and home confinement, economic collapse, all this has put enormous stress on the population. Earlier cases of police mayhem did not lead to such widespread public outrage.
And then, we see displays of both admirable and objectionable behavior - both love and nihilism: A beefy white sheriff hugs a young black demonstrator; cops kneeling down with protesters, volunteers cleaning up the mess caused by looters the previous night...
Unfortunately,, many of the marches have degenerated into the ugly and counterproductive side of such events: Looting and burning down businesses, most often owned by people of color themselves, destroying the very neighborhoods where the most frequent victims of police brutality live, and where most of the dying occurs when violence erupts. The economy, which was already on its back, will suffer even more, as will unemployment and the plight of the poor.
Additionally, the mass gatherings will undoubtedly aggravate the pandemic. America already has the highest rate of infection of ANY country in the world, and this is likely to become more so.
* * * * * * *
Sociologists have developed taxonomies for collective behavior such as riots, studying for example the urban conflicts of the turbulent 1960s. Ralph Conant distinguishes between four consecutive phases: (1): precipitating incident; (2): Confrontation; (3): Roman Holiday and: (4) Siege. (See Conant).
Such concepts seem applicable to outbursts like the Watts riot (1965, 34 deaths) and the Rodney King riot (1992, 63 deaths), and now maybe to the reaction to the George Floyd murder. This was, obviously, the event which precipitated the current civil unrest (phase #1). There followed confrontation (phase #2) between the protesters and the authorities. Then, especially at night, looting, burning, and a sense of euphoria took possession of at least some elements (#phase #3; Roman Holiday), and finally, the authorities can be expected to prevail as they besiege the demonstrators (phase #4).
In most cases, civil unrest ends up being repressed by the government, unless the violent revolution succeeds in overthrowing that government. The government is society’s ultimate power holder, and that power is carried out primarily by the military. A riot ends when the government brings the hammer down.
It is not clear to me whether history repeats itself or not. Nor do I wish to debate this here.
The protest and civil unrest of the past few days differ from such events as Watts and Rodney King in that they are nationwide. On the other hand, the anti-war and civil rights mass movement of the 1960s was nationwide as well. Because the current civil unrest is nationwide, one could expect the government’s response to also be nationwide, i.e. declare martial law, involve the armed forces, etc.
To be sure, the posse comitatus act forbids the use of federal military forces to enforce domestic policies, which is why this job is relegated to the national guards. However, laws can be suspended. A more “dictatorial” response is always a possibility, especially when the leadership is authoritarian. Such a response is a logical possibility, but an improbable one.
For now, I want to exclude from serious consideration a right-wing Coup d’Etat, as well as a left-wing revolution. America has never experienced either of these.
* * * * * * *
So then, what?
One of the most striking aspects of the present situation is the utter absence of any organized response from the federal government. Not only has it failed to provide any effective response, it has actually been almost 100% SILENT.
Is this the silence before the storm? Before the hammer of repression is brought down?
To be sure, there has been almost zero bloodshed so far among the protesters. Even so, I cannot remember one instance in history when the continued break-down of law and order is tolerated by a country’s central government. Sooner or later, the hammer comes down.
And when it does, it does so with a vengeance. Especially when the country is run by a right-wing racist demagogue. Sooner or later, those who have power use it.
* * * * * * *
Now consider the demonstrators’ aims: Their objectives include police reform and the abolition of institutional racism - in other words wholesale societal reform. Police reform must of course be far more than merely “better police training.” The police attracts authoritarian personalities. It is a subculture with distinct (authoritarian and often racist) values. It sees itself at war with the community. Every citizen is viewed as a suspect, as a potential thief and a liar. I base these generalizations on many years of professional experience. I was a professor of criminal justice, I have ridden along with cops innumerable times, and I taught at the California State Prison in Vacaville.
Even more daunting is the protesters’ goal of “making America non-racist.” Is this even possible, in the foreseeable future?
Looking at world history, the far more likely outcome is a repressive counter-revolution of unprecedented magnitude - the sort of military coup d’etat alluded to earlier. That is what has usually happened in most other countries.
The current civil unrest fortifies Trump’s support. It increases tribal polarization. Remember that whites remain the largest tribe by far, still accounting for over two-thirds of the population. Even if millions of whites join the fight for social justice, a majority of them will either react in a reactionary fashion, or remain silent.
* * * * * * *
But maybe not. Maybe we shall not follow historical precedent. Maybe something else will happen.
I don’t know how the country can move forward in the right direction, but I do know one thing: In order for anything good to come out of the present situation, the first and most essential ingredient is NEW LEADERSHIP. There is, currently in America, no leadership.
Throughout history, crises have usually produced new vigorous and capable leaders. Many of them were great. The crisis of slavery brought forth Abraham Lincoln; The Great Depression brought forth Franklin Roosevelt; Winston Churchill emerged during Britain’s darkest hour; out of the endless civil wars in ancient Rome rose great leaders such as Julius Caesar and the emperor Augustus; Sometimes, turmoil produced a great man who went astray, as the French Revolution produced Napoleon. Sometimes, crisis produced a monster, as Germany’s economic and political problems produced Hitler. In every instance, turmoil and crisis produced new leadership. Currently, America does not have anything worthy of that label. The question is: what kind of new leadership awaits us in the near future?
With every approaching election, pundits harangue us about the importance of voting, warning us that our lives depend on the election’s outcome, etc. ad nauseam. But you know what? This time, it’s absolutely true!
© Tom Kando 2020;All Rights Reserved
leave comment here
20 comments:
Tom. I think you have articulated well a number of the emotions and concerns many of us have. Earlier on after the Covid lockdown I suggested to a few people that we create a subfield of sociology called “the virology of social institutions”. In my 2009 book, I explained some of the viruses that had crept into the US governance system and highjacked parts of it. Now we see the hijacking of social movements. There are purposes behind the creation of all social institutions, whether they are governmental, economic, cultural, or media. One obvious example is media when it’s ownership becomes Wall Street investors and the motive of seeking truth gets hijacked by the profit motive. One problem with the police motive to protect and serve all citizens, was how it deviated when laws were pushed by police unions that make it extreme hard to fire bad police. These are some of the things that need to get fixed, and it’s obvious that the hijackers who misuse social institutions for personal purposes will resist reform tooth and nail.
Thanks, Tom. provocative and informative as usual.
First, one detail: I am no fan of Napoleon but coming out of the revolution, we also have Robespierre, the ‘Terreur’ and massive executions.
Can anything good come out of the revulsion at the George Floyd’s murder? I can dream. I’d like to see a governor, a presidential candidate, who knows, have the vision and leadership to propose some bold action such as a commitment to reduce the prison population by 20%, as a good beginning. A George Floyd commission would be given a year and a half to design and implement. Floyd honored, a dent in the proportion of black people who experience prison, perhaps some lessons to be learned from abroad, some steps to address long-term causes.
On a more personal basis, I was interested to learn of your criminal justice background and contact with Solano State prison. A few days ago, I responded to the mayhem on my morning TV by emailing:
A few times a week, I am in touch by phone with Quinton Watts, an inmate at Solano State prison. He is innocent of the crime he was accused of committing. The heavy knee of institutional racism is weighing down on his neck. A black man, with diabetes, in prison, informed that he would soon be transferred to Chino State prison where the coronavirus is rampant, that heavy knee could kill him. I have read thousands of pages of court documents. The trial was a parody of justice. Subsequent events confirm his innocence and were ignored. These, and the indifference to his remaining in prison, are manifestations of the institutional racism that this country is paying a heavy price for practicing or tolerating.
Any suggestions?
Tom, I love your writing. You raise so many deep questions and I especially like the possible conclusion you drew as to where the potential of the authoritarian backlash from the majority white population.
And I can't imagine what it would feel like to locked away into prison for something I know I didn't do ... and yet that is where I get the most inspiration from others who have shown that they have "freed their minds" to have peace within even when their bodies have been imprisoned.
I read your message with fascination and admire your critical view of the events and sincerely hope that the situation can be arranged in a dignified manner. Our time really requires a capable solution for the current situation.
Dad, this is an outstanding statement. There are no easy answers that white people can give right now and we're going to have to remain supportive of the efforts of all African Americans, to amplify their voices. And, while I could not agree more that voting is critical, I would add that we MUST support candidates from these communities. I cannot tell you how many disappointing and upsetting votes I've witnessed in my career, including votes from politicians of color who are acting against their constituents' own best interests. We need actual members of those communities to have an actual voice in the process. Also, I'd like to talk more with Edric about this inmate. If I can help to facilitate a dialogue with your or the inmate's legislators, please get my email from my dad. DKK
Thank you Tom! I love to read your blogs! I hope you are well.
Hi Tom,
Was hoping you would be able to provide me with more hope for the future.
Thanks for the overview and so sorry we don’t have some obvious outcomes as yet.
I have been reading about meritocracy this week. Another one of those challenges that most people don’t even try to understand.
Hoping to outlive and support appropriate changes in the world to build something better for all.
It is always nice to receive your perspective.
Good analysis - but I’m not very optimistic - the future looks grim.
BRAVO THANK YOU
RIGHT ON
I LIVE ON TOP OF A BUILDING
5 BLOCKS FROM THIS CHAOS
IT IS TRULY UNBELIEVABLE
TO SEE FLAMES
HEAR SIRENS
AND PEOPLE SCREAMING
WHAT CIVILIZATION
WHAT HAVE WE BECOME
THAT IS WHY YOUR LETTER IS
SO POIGNANT AND INTELLIGENT
THANK YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
Tom:
Nice contribution. It is hard to apply sociological analysis to a crisis of the magnitude we are facing,
driven in large part by a narcissistic president. Mostly, I just want to scream about what is happening,
although that's not of much use and drives the cats under the bed. One thing that does interest me is
the wedding of Marxism with neo-Nazi themes---the belief in the collapse of a rotten political and
economic order and the rise of the alt-Right driven in part by riots, etc. It's a belief similar to that of
the Weathermen who believed that civil unrest would bring about a crackdown by federal forces that
would then lead to widespread revolt and the rise of a new system. We know how well that turned out.
Hope you and Anita are doing well and not suffering from the boredom of being confined to your home.
It’s gratifying to get a substantial number of comments. Thank you.
Gordon reminds us that some American institutions have evolved to the point of being dysfunctional, and that much of this has to do with the fact that many institutions and laws represent special interests, rather than the national well-being.
Edric’s suggested prison reform would be an excellent start. I taught criminal justice at Sac. State for many years, and sociology to the inmates at the Vacaville state prison. The latter experience was quite rewarding, as the inmates appreciated the opportunity to take college-level classes, even behind bars. I learned a lot.
The possibility brought up by Hutch reminds me of Viktor Frankl’s “existential therapy," i.e. the psychic liberation that remains a possibility even in the midst of horrific conditions...
I also want to thank Joris, Margo and my daughter for their support. I am always so proud of my daughter’s wisdom and insights.
Thanks also to Jan who, as a nurse, is one of our brave front-line first responders.
Sandy mentions the possibility of “meritocracy.” Certainly something currently in short supply at the White House.
To Dan: I remember well the 4 years I spent in Minneapolis, where I received my doctorate. Those years included the turbulent late sixties, with buildings burning and tanks rolling down Hennepin Avenue. Deja Vu. That turmoil did result in some positive accomplishments - an end to the war, progress on civil rights, Nixon’s resignation, etc. One can at least hope for progress this time around as well...
Of course, Scott is totally correct in questioning the value of extremism on both the Right and the Left. That’s why - when considering the forthcoming presidential election - I always quote Voltaire, who allegedly warned against letting the “perfect be the enemy of the good.” Meaning that just because the most progressive candidates - Sanders, Warren, etc. - were eliminated from the race, we should not abandon the second-best choice (Biden,) as did so many idiotic democrats who disliked Hillary enough to facilitate Trump’s election...
Yes. Lively set of comments.
Tom: Please let your son have my email and phone as he requested. edriccane@aol.com, (916) 973-8569. Thanks.
I am full of optimism about the racial situation in America.
Racial conflict and race riots have happened before.This time is different.
How?
Because the opposition has already been defeated. The IDEA of equality has won, though the effort to achieve it continues.
What I mean is this--and I understand it's a generalization. In the 60s, a substantial number of Americans really did want to keep black Americans down. They really did view African-Americans as "less than." They really did not want equality.
Today, such people exist but they are far fewer in proportion. Overall, the power structure--businesses, the military, the intellectual elite, branches of government--agrees with the protesters. The protesters want structural change. In general, so do the structures! It's just very hard.
George Wallace is dead. Today, we have so many people of good will who are ready to do the hard work of structural change. The culture is shifting, and cultural change is more powerful, longer lasting, deeper rooted than any change in the legal framework.
I remember watching the riots of the 1960’s and then the riots of 1992, and now the riots of 2020, but I probably won’t be alive to watch the riots of 2045. The one lesson that comes from all is that “this too shall pass, no matter how much things change they will always remain the same”. Racism is claimed to arise from “ignorance”, when in reality it feeds off daily “observation”. I was an idealist lefty in college, but now 50 years later, experience has hardened me. As long as the African American population continues to reinforce the negative stereotypes of illegitimacy, illiteracy, criminality, and belligerency, people with common sense will adopt an attitude of “benign neglect”…just avoid them and their pathologies.
The contrast between the last two comments is revealing:
I laud the author of "Science Thrillers" for her optimism, which I only share on the days when I feel good. I hope that she is right, and she very well might be.
Anonymous, on the other hand, is demonstrably wrong. It is sad that he has lost his way as he got old. Racism is the disease of not accepting the self-evident fact that all human beings have equal value. It is not so complicated.
Actually it is getting complicated. Science and genetics are reaching the point where we might begin to see irrefutable evidence that some "races" are more adapted to certain skills or whatever. Words will be chosen very carefully to describe these traits on both sides of the argument. Remember all human beings being created equal is a biblical (potentially flawed) concept. The question is will people believe or trust the science?
Science thrillers dot com... Who the fudge is George Wallace?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace
Former governor of Alabama (early 1960s) and presidential candidate
Staunch segregationist.
From wikipedia: "Wallace took the oath of office on January 14, 1963, standing on the gold star marking the spot where, nearly 102 years earlier, Jefferson Davis was sworn in as provisional president of the Confederate States of America. In his inaugural speech, Wallace said:
In the name of the greatest people that have ever trod this earth, I draw the line in the dust and toss the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny, and I say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever."
Tom, Ghandi showed the world that non-violent, peaceful protest and civil disobedience could bring down an empire. MLK proved the same during the '60's. I'm reminded of a line from the movie "Starman" --paraphrasing it here: "humanity shows its best when things are at their worst". Also, I disagree with you calling Julius Caesar and Augustus great leaders; both were tyrants at best.
Good comment, Steve. Your examples (Gandhi, MLK) are better than mine. Regarding Caesar and Augustus, you may be right. But my more general point - that in times of crisis, leaders emerge, both good and bad - remains valid (as your Starman quote suggests).
Post a Comment
Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!