Monday, January 14, 2013

A Review of the Movie "Zero Dark Thirty"

By Tom Kando

This is the story of Operation Neptune Spear, the mission to kill  Osama Bin Laden. The mission has also been  called operation Geronimo, the code name given to Bin Laden by the CIA.

The movie describes the ten-year hunt for   Bin Laden and its successful conclusion.  It describes an incredible sequence of black ops, CIA board meetings, “black sites” where detainees are being tortured, explosive Pakistani streets, suicide bombings,  and of course the final assault on the Bin Laden compound in Abbottabad.

In one word: awesome. The central character - better word: heroine -  is CIA operative “Maya,” played brilliantly by Jessica Chastain. Through dogged determination, she is able to  almost single-handedly track down and  finally eliminate the world’s number one public enemy. She survives assassination attempts and overcomes Washington bureaucracy. One of the many controversies surrounding the movie is the extent to which the Maya character is fictitious. It is not, although it is probably embellished.
Another controversy (now involving US senators such as Dianne Feinstein, chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee) is the water boarding and other forms of torture depicted in the movie.  It has been argued that the movie condones  these practices and claims that they produced useful intelligence towards Bin Laden’s elimination.

Not really. The practices are depicted, because without this, the movie would lose half of its veracity. Whether or not torture helped to find Bin Laden is in the eyes of the beholder. It is also pointed out that the practices ceased,  fully or nearly fully, after Obama became President. Whatever the case may be, the US government and the CIA may have been guilty of torture, but the film is not guilty of defending it.

Director Kathryn Bigelow (who also did the equally daunting movie The Hurt Locker  in 2008) has no political axe to grind. In the  Sacramento Bee   film critic Carla Meyer’s correct word: the film is naturalistic. That is, it is faithful to reality. It is honest and truthful.

One of the most unnerving sequences  was Maya’s struggle against the Washington bureaucracy.  Once she was in possession of impressive evidence about Bin Laden’s whereabouts, she presented it to her superiors - including CIA chief Leon Panetta, played by James Gandolfini.   She was given the run-around - for months. As a result of the delay, Bin Laden’s trail could easily have been lost.

Personally, I would have enjoyed it if the movie had included  a brief enactment of  the US President  himself, at some point in the decision-making process. After all, that is where the buck stops.

The climactic assault on the Bin Laden compound is heart-stopping, even though we know the outcome, of course. It bears remembering that one of the two helicopters used  in the assault was lost at the very outset - that’s half  the assault  fleet! In 1980, Operation Eagle Claw  was carried out to rescue the hostages  in Iran, and it was a dismal failure. Shit happens. Somehow, Barack Obama  has been a luckier president than Jimmy Carter.

One thing I did not understand was why the special forces assaulting the compound were not immediately confronted by a dozen body guards rushing out with blazing guns to defend themselves  and their leader to the death. As it is, the operation did not cost a single American casualty.

Arguably, by 2011 Osama Bin Laden was a decrepit old man, somewhat irrelevant as a worldwide terrorist leader. The greatest value of taking him out was perhaps symbolic. But that is something. Justice is something. And  Americans could use a good   morale boost. That is what the operation itself did in 2011. The movie Zero Dark Thirty is a value-neutral description of the operation, not chauvinistic propaganda. leave comment here

4 comments:

Gordon said...

Maya's interaction with the bureaucracy was more successful than most. You may remember the FBI Minnesota arrest of Mousawi and the national FBI ignoring it. Bureaucracies are top-down, and feedback from the bottom-up is abnormal because people want to please their superiors and not lose their jobs. They focus on carrying out the superior's orders and tend to ignore anyone on the bottom or the side that might be more right or have something valuable to say.

Scott said...

Excellent review!

Tom Kando said...

Thanks for your comments.
Gordon is right. Maya's achievement is exceptional (assuming that things happened more or less the way the movie says they did).

I am often reminded of Yale psychologist Irving Janis’ well-know research on Group Think. Bureaucracies are notorious for this, and consequently for the mistakes that are made due to everyone’s reluctance to question consensus. Great leaders deliberately reject Group Think. Janis himself uses president Kennedy as an example of a leader who promoted dissent and questioning among his staff, and thus avoided disastrous decisions...

Gordon said...

I have two copies of "Victims of Group Think." Read it in grad school. Its an important book.
Group think is another dimension to bureaucracy than the top-down authority structure I had in mind. But both play a role.

Post a Comment

Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!