As I open the morning newspaper, hardly a day goes by when I don’t see a notice of another gun death in the greater Sacramento region. The small notices are usually hidden on a secondary page. The forever snuffing out of a human life is so banal, so everyday. On January one of this year, I started keeping count.
As of January nine , the Sacramento Bee has reported 9 people shot to death in the greater Sacramento area. Yes - one per day. This includes one suicide, one suspect killed by a cop, and the double murder on New Year’s eve.
If this trend continues, we will end up with 365 deaths by gun for the year. I know, my total so far is a mishmash. Still, gun deaths are gun deaths.
Number of criminal homicides in 2011 in Sacramento city (pop. not quite half a million): 36.
Number of
criminal homicides in 2011 in Sacramento MSA (2.2 million people): 95.
This is a rate of 4.4 per 100,000.I guess if you include suicides by gun plus suspects killed by cops, you probably arrive at about one gun death per day in our region. The suicide rate is more than two and a half times the murder rate. However, not all suicides are by gun. And about a dozen people are killed by policemen each year in our region. So, yes, my informal survey results are compatible with the official stats: Our region probably experiences, on average, close to one gun death per day.
(See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate)
Region/Continent
|
Rate per 100,000
|
Count
|
Africa
|
17.0
|
169,105
|
Caribbean
|
16.9
|
7,001
|
Central America
|
28.5
|
44,997
|
Highest rate in the world:
Honduras
|
91.6
|
7,104
|
Mexico
|
22.7
|
25,757
|
North America
|
3.9
|
15,302
|
US
|
4.8
|
14,748
|
Canada
|
1.6
|
554
|
South America
|
20.0
|
79,039
|
Highest count in the world:
Brazil
|
21.0
|
40,974
|
Asia
|
3.1
|
127,120
|
China
|
1
|
13,410
|
Japan
|
0.4
|
506
|
Europe
|
3.5
|
24,025
|
Highest count: Russia
|
10.2 (2.5 times US)
|
14,574 (more than US)
|
Eastern Europe
|
6.4 (Higher than US)
|
19,828
|
Western Europe
|
1.0
|
1,852
|
France
|
1.1
|
682
|
Germany
|
0.8
|
690
|
Italy
|
0.9
|
529
|
Monaco
|
0
|
0
|
Netherlands
|
1.1
|
179
|
Switzerland
|
0.7
|
52
|
United Kingdom
|
1.2
|
722
|
Australia
|
1.0
|
229
|
Palau
|
0
|
0
|
World
|
6.9 (Higher than US)
|
466,078
|
Comments:
First, how does the US compare? We keep hearing how terribly high our homicide rate is. But it is also possible to “look at the glass as half full:” At a rate of 4.8 per 100,000, the US rate is (1) well below the world’s average, (2) two and a half times below that of Russia, (3) lower than that of Eastern Europe, (4) only slightly higher than that of the whole of Europe, and most importantly, two and a half times lower than a generation ago! For example, back then, New York City had 2,000 murders per year, now it has 400! Of course, we can do better. But facts are facts.
As
to causes and correlations: I can only touch very briefly on a few of
the major arguments that have been raging
since the Newtown massacre.
1.
Is there a correlation between the prevalence of mental illness (treated or
not) and the rate of criminal homicide? NO.
2.
Between the rate of single parenthood, decline of “family values,” etc., and
criminal homicide? Not a direct one.
3. Socio-economic conditions? YES
(but this is very complicated)
4.
Culture? Absolutely. The South has always been the most violent
and criminal region of the US. Latin
America has always had the highest rate
of criminal violence in the world. Culture explains much of these two facts. Culture includes values such as
machismo, honor, and also violent popular
culture.
5.
The SINGLE STRONGEST CORRELATE of the homicide rate: AGE. The younger a
country’s population is, the higher its crime rate. In the US, 98% of all
crimes are committed by people under 50; 2% by people over 50. As our country
ages, it becomes less criminal. The Third World is more violent because its
population is younger.
6. The second most important correlate of crime
is GENDER. Not a single one of the recent mass murders in America was committed
by a woman.
7.
Finally: Is there a positive correlation between the rate of criminal homicide
and the prevalence of guns? No
correlation is perfect, but the answer to this
is YES.
Keep
in mind that ALL relationships are
multi-causal, and that the ultimate
answer to all seven items is, “it
depends.” But to do justice to these
factors will require a future post. For
now, just remember one easy formula:
MORE GUNS = MORE DEATHS.
3 comments:
Another perspective is that without guns, do we also then start banning what would likely then be used? Murders Will take place! 323 murders by assault rifles in 2011 and 496 by Ballpeen hammers. Banning is not the answer, controlling who gets ahold of them is. For starters, I like the idea of needing a gun license to purchase ammo. These are solutions without effecting the 2nd amendment. I don't want to debate the need for changes, just want people to keep an open mind to options on the topic.
Fascinating and informative. Thank you for pulling this important information together. I only wish more people discussing would relie on facts.
I thank Anonymous and Carol Anita for their comments.
hopefully there is a bit of a consensus emerging, that the status quo regarding fire arms in America is too permissive, and unacceptable...
Post a Comment
Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!