by Madeleine Kando
I went to the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston the other day. It is rated as the second best Fine Arts Museum in the country, so it is a mystery why I don’t go more often.
Amongst their many galleries, they have an incredible Ancient World collection of 85,000 works of art. There are rooms full of Greek and Roman statues, pottery, coins and jewelry and one feels somewhat overwhelmed. As Greek and Roman statues usually are, they are large, white and the ones that are full bodied are mostly of muscular, extremely well-built men. This period in history and art was totally devoted to the human form. And how do you portray the human form best? Naked of course.
It is an orgy of male beauty, not female beauty. Women are conspicuously absent in these rooms. It is ALL about men. Men eating, fighting, disk throwing, killing lions, making love (to other men)… The concept of beauty was the domain of men, not women. Greeks and Romans adored the human body, but it was the male body that they went bonkers over.
Another hallmark of these ideal nude statues, is the small size of their penises. It is as if the sculptor got so tired after chiseling these powerful bodies, that he didn’t bother spending time on their private parts. But in fact, small penises were considered classy in those days. A sign of moderation and self-control, virtues that formed the Romans’ view of ideal masculinity. Isn’t that refreshing? Aristophanes summed up the ideal traits of his male peers as “a gleaming chest, bright skin, broad shoulders, tiny tongue, strong buttocks, and a little prick.” Heroes, gods and nude athletes had small penises. Erect, large penises were reserved for Satyrs and various other non-ideal men, men of the lower class.
That is not to say that Ancient Greeks didn’t like sex. Judging by the scenes painted on some of the vases, they liked it a lot. But again, it wasn’t sex with women that they liked. It was sex with young boys. Yes, I know, it sounds terrible, but it was part of their culture. Initiating a young male into the life of an adult was by courting him, educating him and possibly having sex with him. They had a recurring event called the ‘symposium’, where men (not women, unless they were courtisanes) drank, talked, recited poetry, sang and yes, had sex with their young proteges.
There were rules, though. You didn’t have sex with a very young boy, or with another adult male. Once these proteges started to grow facial hair, they were considered off-limits. What a strange reversal of values. Nowadays, it is verboten to have sex with a minor, not with an adult of either sex.
Nudity was so valued in the Ancient World, that Spartan warriors sometimes went into battle in the nude. This might be a myth, but there is no doubt that nudity was a symbol of strength and virtue. When you see a battle scene that shows a naked figure and one with clothes on, you know which one is the conqueror. Nakedness equates power.
After you have been subjected to this orgy of nudity, you enter the galleries that house later periods in art. Going from the Ancient Greeks and Romans to the gallery that houses the Middle Ages collection is a bit of a shock. What happened? Where are the bodies? Hidden under long, finely chiseled covers, up to the neck preferably. Even the heads are covered. Unless it is a potbellied cherub, Jesus Christ on the cross or dying in the arms of a group of fully draped women, nudity is completely absent.
I know, it’s all about chastity and celibacy, values promoted by the Christian faith, which took over Europe during the Dark Ages. Aren’t we fortunate that the Renaissance brought back the Greek and Roman veneration of the human form? Otherwise we would still be stuck guessing what is under all these layers of masterfully cut marble.
These days it is not so much the male form that enchants us, but the female form. We are obsessed with breasts and buttocks, small waists and long legs. A woman in Ancient Greece would feel quite vindicated if she knew how she has made a come-back after all these centuries of being shunned and portrayed as being closer to animals than humans. In fact, the more beautiful a Greek woman was, the more she was thought to be deceitful and manipulative.
Either way, my visit to the museum made me realize that the concept of beauty has changed throughout history. For the Greeks and Romans, the human body also represented spiritual perfection. Beauty was the link between the physical and the spiritual. It was also influenced by their mathematical, rational approach to defining beauty. It had to do with symmetry, the right proportions and balance. They combined this with their love of life and the living world, including the human body. They were humanists.
But of course, there is a lot more to beauty than simple equations and I am not one to judge what qualifies as beautiful. It is much too complicated and personal. And a little imperfection goes a long way to make beauty more interesting.
That said, it gave me a sense of satisfaction to be surrounded by art whose main purpose is to represent the human body as a perfect creation. Our culture and customs might have changed drastically, but gazing at theses Adonises, it didn’t feel like they were so different from you and I: we still have the same physique. Some of their perfection rubbed off on me and I walked out of the exhibit slightly taller than when I entered. leave comment here
8 comments:
Marvelous, most human and a delight to read and ponder. Geeez, we truly need more of you in this hideous period that I sincerely hope is only a passing psychotic episode. Thank you and more please, Madeleine.
Dear Madeleine,
Hope you are fine, we haven't met for quite some time.
Actually, the ancient Greek did not invent beauty,they only postulated what beauty should look like. Only when I was born did beauty materialized...
Best,
Daniel
Thank you Bob: What a wonderful compliment you give me. Makes me want to write more...
Daniel, of course I know beauty did not get invented by anyone. The title was just to get people to think that 'maybe' beauty existed before you came along.
Thanks for your interesting review. I can see the efficiency of nudity during war. No need to sew uniforms.
On Greek homosexual practice with boys was slightly less abusive than we might imagine. from wikipedia: Intercrural intercourse was a common outlet for pederasty in ancient Greece,because anal sex was considered demeaning to the receiving partner.[7] The Ancient Greek term for this practice was διαμηρίζειν diamērizein ("to do [something] between the thighs").[8]
Would be interesting to research if there were practical reasons for such seemingly unusual "beauty" trends.
Hi Suzanne: Yes, fighting naked would save the military quite a bundle.
Madeleine’s post on sexuality in antiquity is a lot of fun, as are all her pieces.
Because I had an extreme “classical” education ( six years of Greek and Latin, of ancient Roman and Greek history, read Plato, Tacitus and all the others in the original, etc.), I want to add a few things.
To be sure, my perspective is sixty years old, and this probably explains why it differs from Madeleine’s, which is more current, I suppose.
For one thing, while there is (in antiquity) certainly MORE male nudity and glorification of the male body than the female, let’s not forget the myriads of gloriously beautiful female personifications during that era, too, beginning with Milo’s Venus (supposed to be the most beautiful person in the world), all the statues of Artemis, Hera, vestal virgins and other women. (And there were even statues of hermaphrodites).
Also, when I come across the word “Symposium,” my immediate thought is not about sex-with-young-boys, but with philosophical debates, Platonic/Socratic dialogues, etc. I suppose both things happened , but putting the “sex part” at the center is too sensational...
As to penis size: You and Aristophanes may posit the view that a small penis was viewed (by some) as being more desirable/admirable/respectable, or whatever, but I have never heard that this was the dominant cultural view...I am not convinced, certainly not as far as Rome is concerned. Petronius’ Satyricon, for one, certainly thinks pretty highly of the well endowed. I guess one learns something new every day.
By the way, let’s not get confused: The most famous glorification of the naked male body is probably Michelangelo’s David. But this was the work of a 16th century Renaissance gay guy.
And regarding ancient Rome, again: Sure, many prominent Romans buggered each other, but there was also homophobia, and stigma to being on the “receiving end.”
Now don’t misunderstand me: Classical antiquity was very sexist (which culture in world history was not?). Rome was a patriarchy, no doubt about it. I just wanted to bring some nuance to your provocative statement.
Thank you! What an interesting way to start my day!
Post a Comment
Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!