Thursday, March 5, 2020

The Coronavirus



I have been monitoring the corona virus’ spread,  and I also just communicated with some friends  in Holland.  

As of March 5, 88 countries have been contaminated  by the pandemic. Of these, only 18 have experienced deaths. In 70 of these countries, no one has died yet. To be sure, a majority of these 70 countries are just beginning to be infected: In 21 of them, only  one case has been  identified  so far. Half of the zero-death countries (35) have only reported between 1 and 5 cases until now.

However, some of the zero-death countries already have significant numbers of cases, so we can start asking: What are they doing right? How do they differ from countries where the death rate is significantly higher? Can we learn from them?

I have listed  the countries which combine a zero-death rate with an already fairly widespread epidemic within their borders. The first table below shows the ten most notable such countries, and I compare their numbers with ours:
                                   
                    Coronavirus spread as of March 5, selected countries, zero death rate
Country
number of cases
equivalent for US
number of deaths
Germany
543
2,172
0
Singapore
117
6,786
0               
Switzerland
93
4,332
0  (March 4)
United Kingdom
116
580
0 (March 4)
Scandinavia
249
2,988
0
Kuwait
58
4,640
0
Bahrain
55
11,990
0
Malaysia
55
567
0
Netherlands
82
1,574
0
Canada
37
322                 
0
Total
1405
1,686
0
US
221
221
12

Other noteworthy countries where the death rate is not zero, but close to it, are listed in the second table.
                 Coronavirus spread as of March 5, selected countries, low death rate     
Country
number of cases
equivalent for US
number of deaths
Japan
364
946
6
France
425
2,073
7
Spain
282
1,974
3
Hong Kong
105
4,641
2
Australia
60
798
2
Thailand
47
222
1
Taiwan
44
603
1
Total
1,327
1,194
22
US
 221
221
12
                                   
Table 2 reveals that Japan, France, Spain, Hong Kong, Australia, Thailand and Taiwan are all more contaminated than the US, yet currently suffer from a lower death rate caused by the coronavirus.

One additional  country which must be mentioned is Vietnam: While it has identified 16 cases, EVERY one of these cases has fully recovered.

Of course, one can always  question  the reliability of these numbers.
                                               
The main question on my mind is to what extent (some of) these differences have to do with how  countries RESPOND to the crisis. Meaning, among other things, the efficiency, resources, competence and speed with which the medical and governmental authorities are dealing with  the situation.

For example, how are various countries dealing with the TESTING of suspected patients? According to news accounts, the US hasn’t handled this very well.  There are conflicting reports: On the one hand, we are told  that  testing is just now becoming universally available. On the other hand, one hears that the supply of test kits is still vastly insufficient.

Then  there is the  minimizing of  public gatherings such as sports events, which many of the worst affected countries such as Italy have implemented.

Another important measure are school closures, which have been in effect in Japan and in the Netherlands.

This morning, a Dutch friend reported to me that her nieces are quietly doing  their homework at home. They receive their assignments by computer.  The schools are closed, and there are no sports events. They are allowed to go outside and to go buy necessities.

Of course,  these actions  are all  about minimizing the spread, not preventing patients from dying.

Why the mortality rate varies so sharply from country to country is not clear. Are some countries “healthier” and/or  more resistant to (some) diseases  than others?  Do different gene pools respond to viruses differently? Obviously, the reasons for these differences are far more complicated than I could ever figure out.

I suppose I could go on a rant about the vaunted superiority of medicine in  Europe, Canada, Japan and elsewhere, and America’s alleged backwardness in this regard. But I have no evidence whatsoever about how the different countries have responded to this crisis so far. And I certainly don’t wish to politicize this issue.

All I am suggesting  is that it would be wise for us to find out if other countries are taking steps that help mitigate the problem, and to promptly learn what these are.  I would surely like to know why ZERO out of nearly 600 German patients have died, versus 12 out of 221 Americans, so far.

© Tom Kando 2020;All Rights Reserved

leave comment here

18 comments:

ScienceThrillers.com said...

It's all about "the denominator." While there will certainly be some variation in survival from one country to another, the main factor we're seeing at this point is the variation in testing. In countries that are testing widely, they will detect many mild cases. In countries that are testing mostly those who end up in the hospital, the death rate will look artificially high.

Only over time will we see the full picture.

ScienceThrillers.com said...

For science background about emerging infections and more information about coronavirus, you can read my long-form article here https://www.amyrogers.com/coronavirus/

Hans Bol said...

Dear Tom,

thanks for supplying your article. Of course we follow what is happening as closely as time permits us. A few things strike me:
- nothing asbout those patients that fully recovered; yesterday I read something for the first time about people that recovered fully but had (severe?) scar tissue in the lungs as a result of the infection;
- South America and Africa seems to be totally absent in the figures we get to see; no cases there? Too hot? Different genes? No testing at all or not available? I think I only read once about 1 case in Brazil, I believe.

Gisela Butler said...

In Washington 9 died in one facility, I'm not sure if it was a care home. One person just died here in Roseville hospital.

Frank said...

Las met belangstelling je verhaal, het verschil tussen de verhouding doden-geinfecteerden wordt natuurlijk beinvloed door de gesteldheid van de geinfecteerden: leeftijd-staat van gezondheid- dus in het algemeen de staat van kwetsbaarheid. Deze kunnen zeer verschillen bij diverse "groepen" mensen. Begreep ik dat jullie dit voorjaar naar Europa wilden komen of is m'n bejaarde brein geveld door een cognitieve stoornis?
Beelden zijn makkelijker dan feiten (het geschreven woord) , groeten

Ken said...

Dear Ann and Tom Kando,
The curious contrast of Germany to the USA. Yes, but let’s look at that.
Washington state had about one half of the USA cases. They might have been infected earlier (and advanced before others). Since it is a retirement home their condition might not “have been noticed.” (Not Obamas or Trump’s fault –not to be political.)
Rather than the infections attaching to people who are out and about rubbing elbows with everyone (active younger more resilient people), this very senior center may have had the misfortune to be elderly on top of being exposed earlier. Mortality statistics on the elderly are much more devastating.
It is probably too early to distill the meager data and ascribe source (care) conditions to its severity, except possibly to Iran (licking icons at ‘religious’ sites).
There is another factor that needs to be incorporated: it has been found that Orientals (term Asian too imprecise), are more susceptible to Covid-19, than, Blacks or Occidentals, i.e., Caucasians.

Jon said...

I really appreciated this piece, Tom, as it made a useful and thoughtful map
If ever accumulating and changing statistics. It also highlighted the troubling US mortality rate, worse than China s.
It’s hard to believe our public health response is so feeble or fumbling. My instinct, perhaps unfair, is that it’s due to presidential finance cuts. But that doesn’t explain why/how other countries have a far better testing regime.
Did you send your column to Ami bera?

Paul said...

Hi Tom, een bijdrage voor je tellingen? groet, Paul:
In Rotterdam is een een 86-jarige man overleden aan het virus datCovid-19 veroorzaakt. Het is de eerste dode in Nederland

Tom Kando said...

Thank you for your comments, everyone:
Amy is an extremely knowledgeable epidemiologist, who has published her writing about epidemics in general and the coronavirus specifically. Look up her work, it’s incredibly helpful.
In response to Hans: actually there ARE several African and Latin American countries on the list. So far, their numbers are somewhat smaller than those in Europe and Asia. Sadly, they are likely to “catch up.” It’s not clear that “warmer is better.” We tend to think that way, as influenza fluctuates over the seasons. But we can’t count on the warm season solving this problem for us, as some imbecile recently suggested.

Genes, etc?
Ken, too, brings up the topic of different populations having different levels of resistance to the virus. Gene pools and such. I know absolutely nothing about this.

One thing on which experts (including Amy) probably agree with Hans is that at this point, the most meaningful correlations are those between the illness /mortality numbers on the one hand and the amount of testing that is going in a given country on the other. Right now, in the absence of a vaccine or some "therapeutic serum," nothing is more important than maximizing testing.

Frank and Paul’s Dutch messages: Yes, so now the first Dutch fatality has happened. Frank brings up the fact that different populations have different levels of vulnerability.

I’ll follow Jon’s advice and send this piece and the ensuing exchange of comments to our congressional representative.

Anonymous said...

Speaking of imbeciles, the latest evidence of 15 deaths in the US points to the fact that all deaths have occurred in states with imbecilic Democrat governors and senators.

Tom Kando said...

The coronavirus is political? Appalling.

madeleine kando said...

from an op-ed article in the Guardian:

Like 27.5 million other Americans, I don’t have health insurance. It’s not for a lack of trying – I make too much to qualify for Medicaid, but not enough to buy a private health insurance plan on the Affordable Care Act exchanges. Since I can’t afford to see a doctor, my healthcare strategy as a 32-year-old uninsured American has been simply to sleep eight hours, eat vegetables, and get daily exercise. But now that there are confirmed coronavirus cases in the United States, the deadly virus could spread rapidly, thanks to others like me who have no feasible way to get the care we need if we start exhibiting symptoms.

Nephew Tomi said...

Hi Tom, I read something in bill bryson The Body which came to mind when I read your article. It relates to private healthcare because healthcare providers make more money from cesarean sections, tend to use more antibiotics thereby hindering growth of potentially useful microbes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_origins_hypothesis

Nephew Tomi said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Nephew Tomi said...

In short: Americans have the least varied microbiome in the world. Could this be the reason they are dying more from covid19?

Karen said...




Tom - Are there more cases of CV here or in Europe??
Karen


Tom Kando said...

Hi,
Right now, Europe has far more cases than we do.
But this may change.
They are a bit “ahead” of us in terms of the disease progression.
They also may peak before we do, as China and Korea are already doing.
In a few weeks, it may be the Europeans who might want to forbid Americans to come there.
Bye

Gail said...

Times have changed drastically! I hope we can survive being isolated for months with this pandemic. Making a lifestyle change takes discipline will-power and time. Changing or behaviors in such a short period of time will be difficult.
I hope things get better soon.

Hang in there and stay safe😷,
Gail

Post a Comment

Please limit your comment to 300 words at the most!