by Tom Kando
Halfway through the recent
Olympic Games, I came across an article
by a Dan Wetzel, titled
Sorry, America: China’s leading the real Olympic medal count.
Dan complained that most of our media rank countries by their TOTAL number of medals, regardless of whether they are gold, silver or bronze. This puts America on top and China second. However, Wetzel felt that countries should be ranked by the number of GOLD medals they win. He claimed that the entire rest of the world agrees with this.
As it turned out, America ended up with BOTH the largest number of total medals AND the largest number of gold medals. So Wetzel’s gripe is moot.
Nevertheless, I want to point out that Wetzel was wrong. The differences between gold, silver and bronze performances are often in the milliseconds. It’s often absurd to dismiss silver and bronze performances as far inferior to gold performances. The three are often extremely close. So the total number of medals is more meaningful than just the number of golds.
Furthermore, I have long used a compromise between Wetzel’s position and mine, one which I think is reasonable and could satisfy both sides of the argument: We can WEIGH the three colors by awarding a country 3 points for every gold medal, 2 points for every silver and 1 point for every bronze. Then, rank countries by their total number of points.
I have reviewed the Olympic Games on several occasions in the past: The 2010 Winter Games in Vancouver(Are Countries with the Most Olympic Medals Morally Superior?), the 2004 Summer Games in Athens and the 2008 Summer Games in Beijing (Which Are the Best and the Worst Olympic Countries?) and the 2016 Summer Games in Rio (Why Are Some Countries Good and Some Bad at the Olympics?).In all these previous essays, I used my weighing method. And surprise: Wetzel himself at one point suggests this exact same method, although he doesn’t run with it.
206 countries participated in the 2021 Tokyo Games. Of these, 93 received at least one bronze medal. Table One ranks thirty of these countries by their weighed totals:
Table One: Countries Ranked by Olympic Medals Points
Countries Ranked |
Gold (3 pts.) |
Silver (2 pts.) |
Bronze (1 pt.) |
Total pts. |
1. US |
39 |
41 |
33 |
232 |
2. China |
38 |
32 |
18 |
196 |
3. Russia |
20 |
28 |
23 |
139 |
4. UK |
22 |
21 |
22 |
130 |
5. Japan |
27 |
14 |
17 |
126 |
6. Australia |
17 |
7 |
22 |
87 |
7. Italy |
10 |
10 |
20 |
70 |
8.Netherlands |
10 |
12 |
14 |
68 |
9. Germany |
10 |
11 |
16 |
68 |
10. France |
10 |
12 |
11 |
65 |
11. Canada |
7 |
6 |
11 |
44 |
12. Brazil |
7 |
6 |
8 |
41 |
13. New Zealand |
7 |
6 |
6 |
39 |
14. Hungary |
6 |
7 |
7 |
39 |
20. Switzerland |
3 |
4 |
6 |
23 |
23. Kenya |
4 |
4 |
2 |
22 |
32. Iran |
3 |
2 |
2 |
15 |
33. Belgium |
3 |
1 |
3 |
14 |
35. Slovenia |
3 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
38. India |
1 |
2 |
4 |
11 |
48. Ireland |
2 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
58. South Africa |
1 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
60. Bahamas |
2 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
66. San Marino |
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
67. Fiji |
1 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
72. Mexico |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
73. Bermuda |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
85. Saudi Arabia |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
86. Grenada |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
90. Syria |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
The question is: What causes countries to do well or not at the Olympics? The Games have always been a nationalistic extravaganza. Countries often use them for political propaganda to support their claim that Olympic excellence indicates social and moral superiority. Most blatantly guilty of this were former frequent winners such as the Soviet Union and East Germany. Of course, I reject this absurd claim in my previous posts. Instead, I discuss some of the variables that do, in fact, correlate with and cause success or failure. These include: wealth, culture, and above all, population. The perennial winners tend to be large, affluent, Western countries.
The most obvious thing to do is to compare countries in terms of PER CAPITA medals/points rather than absolute numbers. This is what table Two does for thirty selected countries.
Table Two: Countries Ranked by Olympic Medals Points Per Capita
Country |
Pts. |
Population |
Per capita |
1. San Marino |
4 |
34,000 |
1 per 8,500 population |
2. Bermuda |
3 |
.63,000 |
1 per 21,000 |
3. Bahamas |
6 |
389,500 |
1
per 65,000 |
4.
Grenada |
1 |
.112,000 |
1
per 112,000 |
5.
New Zealand |
39 |
4.9 million |
1
per 126,000 |
7.
Slovenia |
12 |
2.1 million |
1
per 175,000 |
9.
Fiji |
4 |
890,000 |
1
per 223,000 |
10.
Hungary |
39 |
9.8 million |
1
per 251,000 |
11.
Netherlands |
68 |
17.3 million |
1
per 254,000 |
13.
Australia |
87 |
25.4 million |
1
per 292,000 |
18.
Switzerland |
23 |
8.5 million |
1
per 370,000 |
25.
UK |
130 |
66.7 million |
1
per 513,000 |
27.
Ireland |
8 |
4.9 million |
1
per 613,000 |
33.
Belgium |
14 |
11.5 million |
1
per 821,000 |
34.
Canada |
44 |
37.6 million |
1
per 855,000 |
35.
Italy |
70 |
60.4 million |
1
per 863,000 |
38.
Russia |
139 |
144.4 million |
1
per 1 million |
39.
Japan |
126 |
126.3 million |
1
per 1 million |
40.
France |
65 |
67.1 million |
1
per 1 million |
44.
Germany |
68 |
83 million |
1
per 1.2 million |
50.
US |
232 |
328.2 million |
1
per 1.4 million |
60.
Kenya |
22 |
52.6 million |
1
per 2.4 million |
72.
Brazil |
41 |
211 million |
1
per 5.1 million |
73.
Iran |
15 |
82.9 million |
1
per 5.5 million |
75.
China |
196 |
1400 million |
1
per 7.2 million |
76.
South Africa |
7 |
58.6 million |
1
per 8.4 million |
84.
Syria |
1 |
17.1 million |
1
per 17.1 million |
85.
Saudi Arabia |
2 |
34.3 million |
1
per 17.2 million |
90,
Mexico |
|
127.6 million |
1
per 31.9 million |
93.
India |
|
1,366 million |
1
per 124.2 million |
It is no miracle that the US and China garnered hundred times as many medals/points as San Marino and. Bermuda.
Table Two shows each country’s performance while CONTROLLING for population size:
A. The US earned 1 point
per 1.4 million population. It therefore ranks as the 50th strongest country, out of 206.
B. China did even worse: It
earned 1 point per 7.2 million population, thus ranking as
the 75th best.
C. Japan did a bit better, earning 1 point per one million population, which puts it 39th place. It had the advantage of being the host country.
D. The best performers tended to be micro-states and small island nations. Here is a list of nine such countries, along with their rank. (Lack of space prevents me from providing a full list of all 93 countries): San Marino: One point for every 8,500 inhabitants! (#1); Bermuda (#2), Bahamas: (#3), Grenada: (#4). Jamaica (#6), Fiji (#9), Cuba (#17) Qatar (19) Bahrein (#32).
E. Another high performing group consists of fifteen former Communist, Eastern European countries: Slovenia (#7), Georgia (#8), Hungary (#10), Kosovo (#15), Estonia (#16), Serbia (#20), Czechia (#21), Latvia (#22), Armenia (#24), Bulgaria (#26), Mongolia (#28), Slovakia (#29), Belarus (#31), Azerbaijan (#37) and Russia (#38): These fifteen countries all received 1 point per million population or better.
F. Another very successful group consists of four highly developed “Anglo” nations: New Zealand (#7); Australia (#17), Ireland (#27), Canada (#34). A vibrant sports culture also contributed to these countries’ excellence.
G. Eleven highly affluent Western European countries also belong to the more successful Olympic performers: The Netherlands (#11), Scandinavia, (Denmark #12, Norway #14, Sweden #23), Switzerland (#18),the UK (#22), Belgium (#33), Italy (#35), Austria (#36) and France (#40). All earned one point per one million or fewer inhabitants. Only Germany (#44) did a little worse.
H. East Asia’s performance ranged from “ok” to bad: This group includes the following seven countries: Hong Kong (#30), Taipei (#45), South Korea (#51), Malaysia (#78), Philippines (#82), Thailand (#86) and Indonesia (#91).
I. Similarly mediocre was the performance of nine less affluent European states: North Macedonia (#43), Greece (#46), Poland (#52), Lithuania (#53), Portugal #54), Ukraine (#55), Romania (#56), Croatia (#61), and Moldova (#63). Note that many of these are former Soviet countries, too.
J. Two European countries are “outliers:” Finland (#64) and Spain (#77) are rich and they have a vibrant sports culture. They will do much better in the future, as they have in the past.
K. Overall, Latin America’s performance was mediocre to poor. This includes the following eight jurisdictions: Puerto Rico (#42), Dominican Republic (#47), Ecuador (#62), Venezuela (#67), Brazil (#72), Colombia (#74), Argentina (#80), Mexico (#90). Obviously, these are not very affluent countries.
L. Then there are fourteen Middle Eastern and other Muslim countries. They mostly performed badly. They are Israel (#41),Kyrgyzstan #48), Kazakhstan (#57), Tunisia (#58), Turkmenistan (#65), Uzbekistan (#66), Jordan (#68), Kuwait (#69), Turkey (#70), Iran (#73), Egypt (#79), Morocco (#81), Syria (#84), Saudi Arabia (#85). All these countries except Israel are Muslim, and none are highly developed. Some of them are also former Soviet countries.
M. As a group, the ten African countries’ performance was the worst. These countries are: Namibia (#49), Botswana (#59). Kenya (#60), Uganda (#71), South Africa (#76), Ethiopia (#83), Burkina Faso (#87), Cote d’Ivoire (#88), Ghana (#89) and Nigeria (#92). Obviously, their performance reflects the fact that this is the poorest part of the world. Then, too, many of these countries’ best athletes have moved to Europe and to the US.
N. Finally, there is India (#93), with the worst Olympic record of any country receiving medals.
O. The remaining 113 participants did not gain any medals.
In sum: Large and rich
countries are able to send huge delegations to the Olympics: In 2021,
The US had the largest delegation of athletes, as usual (613), followed by Japan (552),
Australia (472), Germany (425) and China (406).
In addition, culture plays a role. For example, India, with a population that is over four times larger than that of the US, ended up dead last in the medal count. Clearly, it is not very much into organized sports, or at least not those which are represented at the Olympics. Most Olympic sports are Western sports.
Finally, many very large
countries did poorly:
Here are nine such countries.
In absolute terms they rank as follows: Brazil (#12), Iran (#32, India (#38),
Egypt (#47), Philippines (#53), Indonesia (#54), Ethiopia (#59), Mexico (#72)
and Nigeria (#78).
In per capita terms, their rankings are far worse: Brazil (#72), Iran (#73), Egypt (#79) Philippines (#82), Ethiopia (#83), Mexico (#90), Indonesia (#91), Nigeria (#92), India (#93). The common denominator is, of course, poverty.
leave comment here