by Tom Kando
August 3-4. Two more mass shootings. This time, in one day. El Paso, 20 dead, Dayton, 10.
So far, this year’s death count for mass shootings is 58 (Source: Mother Jones). Annualized, this comes to about 100. This is roughly the annual average over the past decade or so (except for a couple of years which experienced a very large event, such as the Las Vegas mass shooting in 2017, where 58 people died.
Using a different definition, Wikipedia’s number for 2019 so far is much higher: 246. (See Mass Shootings in the US ). For the full year, this would be over 400. However, the vast majority of the events on Wikipedia’s list resulted in only one death. So One could quibble about what constitutes mass shootings and what does not.
So here we go again, with the same old refrain: The media, the politicians, the main talking points:
1. Most obviously: “We need (more and better) gun control. Outlaw assault weapons, do background checks, etc.” Correct.
2. This is a uniquely American phenomenon. It doesn’t exist in other comparable (highly developed) societies. Correct.
3. The main obstacle to progress consists of power groups such as the NRA and their toadies, largely GOP leaders such as Mitch McConnell. Correct.
4. The problem is mental illness. The problem is that the mentally ill have access to guns. Hmm... Isn’t this subsumed under item #1, above? Do the Europeans, the Australians, the Canadians, the Japanese have less mental illness? I doubt it. So this argument is a diversionary tactic by the defenders of the status quo.
Read more...

