Jury Convicts Pro-Abortion Activist

by Madeleine Kando

Why is violence always committed by the pro-life extremists? Here is a fictitious scenario where the tables are reversed:

Less than an hour after deliberation, the California jury found Max Conwell, the notorious pro-abortion extremist guilty of first-degree murder in the shooting death of pro-life organizer Sam Penskew.

According to the prosecution this was a ‘clear-cut case of first degree murder’. The defense wanted the jury to consider a charge of voluntary manslaughter because of Conwell’s strong pro-abortion convictions.

He firmly believed that anti-abortion organizers deserved to be killed since they ruined the lives of pregnant teens and victims of rape. A representative of the pro-choice movement said: “We condemn any such acts of violence regardless of motivation. The pro-choice movement works to protect the rights of women and the unlawful use of violence is directly contrary to our goal."

Conwell’s defense attorney was very disappointed. He said Conwell was so up front with his admissions of guilt that the voluntary manslaughter defense was hopeless. “The jury never got a chance to get inside Conwell’s head. What about all the pregnant teens whose lives woud have been ruined at Penskew’s hand? I believe they needed to be heard in court.”

Some pro-abortion activits signed a petition arguing that Conwell committed justifiable homicide and they didn’t think that justice was served. “The jury didn’t consider Conway’s motive of promoting abortion. He should have had a more just trial”.

Penskew’s family members said they hope that this brave anti-abortion hero will be remembered for his service to the numerous unborn babies he helped save. leave comment here